[xmail] Re: XMail-AV 1.4 released

2004-11-28 Thread Shawn Anderson
Any chance you might consider adding support for clamav (http://www.clamav.net/) / clamwin (http://www.clamwin.net/)? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason J. Ellingson Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: XMail-AV 1.4 released

2004-11-28 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
Yes. AVG, and ClamAV are on my to do list. Jason J Ellingson Technical Consultant 615.301.1682 : nashville 612.605.1132 : minneapolis www.ellingson.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: R: Re: smtp error

2004-11-28 Thread Rob Arends
Well what the hell do we need RFCs for then? Coders must adhere to the RFCs or risk being incompatible. Just because a lot of MTAs ignore the syntax does not make it right. Rob: -) _ Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...

[xmail] Re: R: Re: smtp error

2004-11-28 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Right !! Or ask for a new RFC to change 'mail from' and 'rcpt to' syntaxes or to accept both ... And why 'MAIL FROM' but not 'COMES FROM' ? ... or just 'IN' and 'OUT' ? If we don't have to adhere to rfc's (equivalent to laws for 'humans' = ), then I will make a new xmail release that speak