[xmail] Re: Abemus Papam ...

2005-04-20 Thread Alexander Hagenah
Great pleasure to present the german Kardinal Ratzinger as the new pope. Especially to Davide. No Italian - a german did it. ;) And next yeah, we'll win the FIFA World Cup. In the final match we'll beat Italy, too. xD Have a nice day guys. :) --=20 Regards, Alexander Hagenah - To unsubscribe

[xmail] Re: Abemus Papam ...

2005-04-20 Thread Sönke Ruempler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 1:22 PM: Great pleasure to present the german Kardinal Ratzinger as the new pope. Especially to Davide. No Italian - a german did it. ;) =20 And next yeah, we'll win the FIFA World Cup. In the final match we'll beat Italy, too. xD=20 =20

[xmail] An easy way to upgrade xmail

2005-04-20 Thread Spyros Tsiolis
Hello, Does anyone know if there is an easy way to upgrade previous versions of xmail to xmail v1.21 ? There is an awfull lot of receipients that I wouldn't want to loose. Two systems. One , xmail v1.20 and the other xmail v1.17 TIA, s. - I merely function as a channel that filters

[xmail] AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Bind sending IP ?

2005-04-20 Thread Harald Schneider
It's a default setting by the server's hoster in order to assign = different addresses to different domains. --Harald -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Bill Healy Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 15:45 An:

[xmail] Re: An easy way to upgrade xmail

2005-04-20 Thread Bill Healy
And create/modify any files or directories that have changed in the changelogs and then just stop xmail, replace the binaries and restart xmail. Bill -- From: S=F6nke Ruempler[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 5:03 AM To:xmail@xmailserver.org Subject:

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Bind sending IP ?

2005-04-20 Thread Bill Healy
Why have different addresses for each domain? Xmail doesn't need a different address for each domain and web sites don't need them either, what's the reason? Bill -- From: Harald Schneider[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 6:48 AM To:xmail@xmailserver.org

[xmail] Re: Bind sending IP ?

2005-04-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: Hi, following scenario: - XMail 1.21 running on RedHat Enterprise Server - The machine hosts 3 IP adresses (1,2,3) - SMTP and POP are bound to IP 2 and 3 which works perfectly. However, mails to AOL bounce back which complain about a

[xmail] AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Bind sending IP ?

2005-04-20 Thread Harald Schneider
I would say load blancing, but since they all meet on the same physical interface, it's nonsense. I think the real reason behind this is to pretend a server park :) Let's quit here - this goes off topic. Thanks for all replies! --Harald - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[xmail] R: Re: Abemus Papam ...

2005-04-20 Thread Dario
First of all guys it's: annuntio vobis gaudium magnum: HABEMVS PAPAM=20 Which means: I announce, with great joy, we have the new Pope It is always a great pleasure to have a new Pope. For sure BENEDICTVUM XVI will be a very good leader and personally I = think it was the best choice, great

[xmail] Re: Multiple SMTP Ports

2005-04-20 Thread Brett
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Dan Porter wrote: I tried using this arguments at the command line: -SI xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:25,587 as well as adding -Sp 25,587 and it didn't work either time. What am I doing wrong? Dan - I might be wrong but... I think you need to use -SI xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:25 AND add -SI

[xmail] Re: Bind sending IP ?

2005-04-20 Thread Rob Arends
Davide, What sort of routing table manipulations are talking about, that would force one src IP over another? This would work IF the secondary IPs are on a _different_ network, otherwise the gateway will be the same and the first/lowest ip will be used. Many MTAs have the feature to specify the