How can I configure XMail to prevent fake local account to send mail to
local account? As there are many viruses do like that.
The smtprelay.tab is configured as:
127.0.0.1TAB255.255.255.255
and SMTP auth is required.
Regards,
Chen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
No options. If filter fail to run without returning a error code, xmail
continues as if filter returned 'ok'
And IMHO it's the best solution, as 99% filters generaly reject only a few
number of mails and if you had the option to say to xmail 'reject when any
filter don't run or timeout', you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:33
AM:
How can I configure XMail to prevent fake local account to
send mail to
local account? As there are many viruses do like that.
The smtprelay.tab is configured as:
127.0.0.1TAB255.255.255.255
and SMTP auth is required.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:54 PM:
Is there a way to configure XMail to reject the incoming mail if the
smtp filter fails to execute for whatever reason and thus failing to
return exit code 3?
No XMail-native chance. Maybe a simple shell script as wrapper could
-Message d'origine-
De : Chris L. Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 31 octobre 2005 15:03
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] the !aex flag
Question,
if !aex means don't run this filter if the user is Auth'ed,
Yes
Shouldn't aex mean only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:40
AM:
if !aex means don't run this filter if the user is Auth'ed,
Yes
Shouldn't aex mean only run this filter on Auth'ed users ?
No
Maybe it should or could, but atm it doesn't. :]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
-Message d'origine-
De : Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 29 octobre 2005 04:11
À : Ladislav Sedivy
Objet : [xmail] Re: Sending mail through my ISP
Hiya!
Since the docs show cram-md5 in lower case I'd suggest doing it
exactly as Francis suggested:
My question originates from a win2000 server problem when it was
failling to crate any new proccesses, thus it wouldn't also be able to
create a wrapper script to check for valid filter return code. The
real problem was in that it happened overnight and XMail excepted quite
a few virus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:59
AM:
My question originates from a win2000 server problem when it was
failling to crate any new proccesses, thus it wouldn't also
be able to
create a wrapper script to check for valid filter return code. The
real problem was in
How does GLST behave when sending mail to many recipients?
It seemed like someone was trying to send one email to many accounts and
one account has been previously cleared by GLST but others did not.
Therefore one account has received a mail every time a client tried to
send email to all
Hello,
I guess If your OS cannot create processes (never heard that
before) you
should file some bug report to Mickeysoft ;-)
No memory left may be quite a valid reason for not creating processes, even
with *nix. :-)
If it's an SMTP-filter limiting SMTP-threads so there's enough memory
-Message d'origine-
De : Sönke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 2 novembre 2005 11:07
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Failed filter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November
02, 2005 10:59
AM:
My question originates from a
I had the same problem.
The solution to solve it was to use glst in filter-post.data.tab
In this way glst runs one time for every recipients.
Ciao.
Sergio C.
Matic ha scritto:
How does GLST behave when sending mail to many recipients?
It seemed like someone was trying to send one email to many
Are there any drawbacks from this configuration (beside running for
every recipient instead for every transaction)?
Matic
Sergio Casagrande pravi:
I had the same problem.
The solution to solve it was to use glst in filter-post.data.tab
In this way glst runs one time for every recipients.
I wasn't able to pinpoint the exact cause of the problem (no entries in
logs, no abnormal usage of bandwidth, normal number mails sent/received,
etc..)
I couldn't even start task manager to see memory usage but I was able to
get it with pslist (RPC) and couldn't see any abnormalities.
I guess
Hi all:
I'm wondering if anyone knows of a filter that will strip attachments
(ideally, attachments over a certain kb threshold) from an incoming message,
post them to a web-accessible directory, and insert a link to the stripped
attachment into the message? I'd like to avoid re-inventing this,
Kirk Friggstad wrote:
Hi all:
I'm wondering if anyone knows of a filter that will strip attachments
(ideally, attachments over a certain kb threshold) from an incoming message,
post them to a web-accessible directory, and insert a link to the stripped
attachment into the message? I'd like to
I wrote one that I have been using for a couple of years now.
It is in C++ for Windows. It quarantines the message and sends a mail
notification message to the recipient with info about the message. If the
recipient replies to this message the quarantined message is delivered.
The process is
18 matches
Mail list logo
