[xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...

2006-11-02 Thread Rob Arends
Davide, I took from your email... !aex,wlex /GLST-PATH/glst --sender @@FROM --raddr @@REMOTEADDR--rcpt @@CRCPT --mfile @@FILE Then looked for wlex and did not see it. SYNOPSIS glst [--mfile MFIL] [--raddr RADDR] [--sender SNDR] [--rcpt RCPT] [--generr ERR] [--rejerr ERR]

[xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...

2006-11-02 Thread Rob Arends
Davide, typically would you remove the predata filter version of the glst when the post-rcpt is added? Rob :-) _ Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...

2006-11-02 Thread Rob Arends
Davide, I'm curious. The original GLST implementation dealt with the triplet of info, the host IP, the To and From email address. I notice that in the post-rcpt implementation, the filters log shows * as the second entry. How does this integrate with the triplets already in the database? Why

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-11-02 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 00.25 30/10/06, you wrote: Ok, this comes from 2005 but I'm going through stuff to include in 1.23. The trailing dot is not legal, according to section 4.1.2 of: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html Path = [ A-d-l : ] Mailbox Mailbox = Local-part @ Domain Domain = (sub-domain 1*(.

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-11-02 Thread Rob Arends
Francesco, You are correct in that DNS does allow trailing dot, in fact when we use dns names without trailing dots, we are using relative dns names. This is why you configure a domain name in your resolv.conf or in windows' interface dns dialog. I have no idea as to why the MTA RFC might not

[xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...

2006-11-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: Davide, I took from your email... !aex,wlex /GLST-PATH/glst --sender @@FROM --raddr @@REMOTEADDR--rcpt @@CRCPT --mfile @@FILE Then looked for wlex and did not see it. SYNOPSIS glst [--mfile MFIL] [--raddr RADDR] [--sender SNDR]

[xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...

2006-11-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: Davide, typically would you remove the predata filter version of the glst when the post-rcpt is added? Unless you want to take a final global decision based on the whole RCPT set, yes. At least, that's wht I did. With SMTP filters, do not make the file

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-11-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Francesco Vertova wrote: At 00.25 30/10/06, you wrote: Ok, this comes from 2005 but I'm going through stuff to include in 1.23. The trailing dot is not legal, according to section 4.1.2 of: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html Path = [ A-d-l : ] Mailbox

[xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...

2006-11-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: Davide, I'm curious. The original GLST implementation dealt with the triplet of info, the host IP, the To and From email address. I notice that in the post-rcpt implementation, the filters log shows * as the second entry. Eh? What do you mean for

[xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...

2006-11-02 Thread Rob Arends
I meant second column. Example. [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 10.90.10.152 219.95.193.45 2006-11-03 05:41:37 post-rcpt 0 3 d:\Greylist\glst.exe Rob :-) _ Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later... -Original Message- From:

[xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...

2006-11-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: I meant second column. Example. [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 10.90.10.152 219.95.193.45 2006-11-03 05:41:37 post-rcpt 0 3 d:\Greylist\glst.exe That happens when you have multiple recipients. That was because in a pre-data filter, in case of multiple