[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Buehler
Hi Davide - Yes, it works from an external line, but not from the server itself. I am trying to figure out why providing the authoritative DNS for that domain (pointing to another server on the net which provides everything else for the domain) causes the failure - it seems to be looping, whic

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote: > > > yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine. > > The fact that it works fine in 1.24 does not mean that there's a TAB. IP > parsing code changed in 1.25, and it there was a TAB in 1.24, that'd have "..

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote: > OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this > server also provides the authoritative DNS for trikorausa.com (but not > local DNS queries or caching!). It does not provide any other services > for trikorausa.com (no email e

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote: > yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine. The fact that it works fine in 1.24 does not mean that there's a TAB. IP parsing code changed in 1.25, and it there was a TAB in 1.24, that'd have been parsed fine anyway. XMail would have been fetched the f

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Rosario Pingaro
>> "213.136.179.20""255.255.255.255" > hoohoho it was not!?!??!!? how stupid am I??? regards Rosario - Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:09 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 50

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Rosario Pingaro
yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine. Regards Rosario - Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:09 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25 > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote: > >> sm

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Rosario Pingaro
yes it does. Rosario - Original Message - From: "CLEMENT Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:34 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25 > > A simple question :) : > > When trying to sending a mail from the sendmail server to a

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote: > smtprelay.tab: > > "10.0.0.0" "255.0.0.0" > "195.60.190.0" "255.255.255.0" > "195.60.191.0" "255.255.255.0" > "213.178.209.0" "255.255.255.0" > "147.123.125.0" "255.255.255.0" > "195.60.88.128" "255.255.255.128" > "213.136.179.21""255.2

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Hello Davide > > Recently I asked you how SMARTDnshost variable affected xmail internal > resolver, and you said that when using SmartDnsHost, xmail only ask for = > the > 'final' request (directly the mx lookup without trying first soa, ns, = >

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Buehler
OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this server also provides the authoritative DNS for trikorausa.com (but not local DNS queries or caching!). It does not provide any other services for trikorausa.com (no email etc.) - the records point to an outside address.

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
A simple question :) : When trying to sending a mail from the sendmail server to a account on = the xmail server does xmail accept de mail ? Francis -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rosario Pingaro Envoy=E9 : mercredi 20 f=E9vrier 2008 18

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Rosario Pingaro
no filter installed in filters.*.tab! spammers.tab is empity. smtp.ipmap.tab is: "0.0.0.0" "0.0.0.0" "ALLOW" "1" Thge problem is in my opinion in the 503 Bad sequence of commands that sendmail logs. Maybe Davide can help. Regards Rosario - Original Message - From: "CLEM

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
If I resume we have : An smtp client at ip 213.136.179.20 The smtp server xmail have : - smtprelay.tab that refer explicitly to the client adresse - no CustMapList setting - no filtering system or transparent proxy in front of the xmail = server Any filter installed on xmail itself ? (all filte

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Rosario Pingaro
no it is the only log line about the problem. CustMapsList variable is commented in my server.tab configuration file. Rosario - Original Message - From: "CLEMENT Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:33 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgra

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Now it seems to be the good log :) Just before this smtp log line , do you have any other line from the = same sender server that show an "SNDRIP=3DEIPMAP " status ? What is the server.tab CustMapsList variable content ? Francis -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Rosario Pingaro
adding the relay of the loopback address doesn't help. this is the smtp log from xmail: "smtp.convergenze.it" "smtp.convergenze.it" "213.136.179.20" "2008-02-20 14:17:17" "ip-179-20.sn3.eutelia.it" "" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S28D32D" "RCPT=ERELAY" "" "

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Rosario Pingaro
no, i don't have any trasparent proxy, very starnge that on 1.24 it works. I will tests adding loopback address. Regards Rosario - Original Message - From: "CLEMENT Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:27 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
I could be completly wrong :) After reviewing the previous posts, it seems strange that the xmail = server rejecting with 'relay denied' and that is supposed to receive the mail = from another 'physical' server is login this line with 127.0.0.1 as the = sender !?!? >> The original message was rec

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Hey Rosario !! Simply add this line at start of your smtprelay.tab file : "127.0.0.1"[TAB]"255.255.255.255" Doing so, you explicitly ask xmail to relay the local address :) Francis -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rosario Pingaro Envoy=E9

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Hello Davide Recently I asked you how SMARTDnshost variable affected xmail internal resolver, and you said that when using SmartDnsHost, xmail only ask for = the 'final' request (directly the mx lookup without trying first soa, ns, = ) I asked this because I had the same problem as Jeff but

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

2008-02-20 Thread Rosario Pingaro
smtprelay.tab: "10.0.0.0" "255.0.0.0" "195.60.190.0" "255.255.255.0" "195.60.191.0" "255.255.255.0" "213.178.209.0" "255.255.255.0" "147.123.125.0" "255.255.255.0" "195.60.88.128" "255.255.255.128" "213.136.179.21""255.255.255.255" "213.136.179.20""255.255.255.255" "89.189.5