[xmail] Re: senderid

2005-06-07 Thread Michael Luke
>From your own sources: "But Wong, who co-authored both the SPF and Sender ID standards, said that stopping spam was never the intention of SPF or Sender ID. The technology is merely a way to stop one loophole spammers use: source address spoofing. Evidence that spammers are publishing SPF records

[xmail] Re: OT: Spam & SPF

2004-09-09 Thread Michael Luke
o. SPF is designed to prevent phishing and spoofing and it seems to do a good job of that.=20 Besides, if spammers are openly advertising which domain they are sending from, it should be much easier to blacklist them or prosecute if they're breaking laws (yeah I know that's wishful thinki

[xmail] Re: SPF

2004-05-31 Thread Michael Luke
Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > >>> This sounds like a perfect candidate for the new pre-data SMTP >>> filters. Any takers? >> >> >> Me me: >> >> http://www.xmailserver.org/xm-spf.pl > > From what I have seen now from it is that a domain should have a SPF > record made in DNS,

[xmail] SPF

2004-05-30 Thread Michael Luke
Hi everybody. I've just started using Xmail 1.18 and am impressed by how well it runs. Does Xmail contain features that I can use to verify Sender Policy Framework rules? http://spf.pobox.com/intro.html Thanks, Michael Luke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe