[xmail] Re: [EDev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mbox format wrapup

2002-05-12 Thread Trish Lynch
les, and even pass to procmail as a local mailer... So I'm pretty sure that qmail at least has the ability to add that line... but again, not having gotten it to work yet (I'm going to just install it from source instead, probably have an easier time), I'

[xmail] Re: [EDev] Re: Re: Re: Re: mbox format wrapup

2002-05-12 Thread Trish Lynch
is handed to Ecartis from the MTA via alias. and Ecartis keeps appending to this box for each list, therefore creating an "mbox" with the proper format. I also see nothing that *requires* it to be there, just that its generally "best practices" (as assumed

[xmail] Re: [EDev] Re: Re: mbox format wrapup

2002-05-12 Thread Trish Lynch
ong in there, those are messages passed through after the SMTP handshake. I can add to RFC822 Headers. Now, MTAs are not "RFC822" routers, but in fact talk SMTP and ESMTP which of which the first is described in RFC821 -Trish -- Trish Lynch [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: [EDev] Re: Re: Re: Another Bug! Wrong mbox format.

2002-05-04 Thread Trish Lynch
in this case, delivery to the archive is via Ecartis, so Ecartis needs to be able to write correctly formatted mbox files So I can think of many places to look at *how* one goes about handling the situations above... (mail.local code anyone?) -Trish --