[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Ana Paula Fernandes wrote: > Yes, i know, but with the same problem, too many retrys (with interval > of few seconds between), the debug log show the same entry some times: > > with CheckMailerDomain 1: > > Maximum DNS query depth 32 exceeded ('ls5.net') > SMTP Client. >

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-10 Thread Ana Paula Fernandes
Yes, i know, but with the same problem, too many retrys (with interval of few seconds between), the debug log show the same entry some times: with CheckMailerDomain 1: Maximum DNS query depth 32 exceeded ('ls5.net') SMTP Client. SMTP Filter. blablablabalbala Maximum DNS query depth 32 exc

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Ana Paula Fernandes wrote: > I have same problem with a new domain now, but in this i have find the origin. > > When i receive mail from pellicano.biz or ls5.net i receive this > message in the debug mode: > > "Maximum DNS query depth 32 exceeded ('pellicano.biz')" > or > "M

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-10 Thread Ana Paula Fernandes
I have same problem with a new domain now, but in this i have find the origin. When i receive mail from pellicano.biz or ls5.net i receive this message in the debug mode: "Maximum DNS query depth 32 exceeded ('pellicano.biz')" or "Maximum DNS query depth 32 exceeded ('ls5.net')" I have CheckMail

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote: > At 10.35 10/04/07, you wrote: > > >I agree, but i have thousand of entrances of this, all for > >pellicano.biz, all after and immediately after the upgrade. I only > >running 1.25-pre04 for 30 minutes. > > Do you mean: I would like XMail not to rep

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-10 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 10.35 10/04/07, you wrote: >I agree, but i have thousand of entrances of this, all for >pellicano.biz, all after and immediately after the upgrade. I only >running 1.25-pre04 for 30 minutes. Do you mean: I would like XMail not to report this kind of error in the Event Log? > > > Description:

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-10 Thread Ivo Smits
- Original Message - From: "Ana Paula Fernandes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:35 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ... >I agree, but i have thousand of entrances of this, all for > pellicano.biz, all after and immediately after the upgrade.

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-10 Thread Ana Paula Fernandes
I agree, but i have thousand of entrances of this, all for pellicano.biz, all after and immediately after the upgrade. I only running 1.25-pre04 for 30 minutes. Ana Paula On 4/10/07, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Ana Paula Fernandes wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I using 1.25-pre02 with

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-09 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Ana Paula Fernandes wrote: > Hi, > > I using 1.25-pre02 without problem, i have upgrade to 1.25-pre04 and > my "Event Log" has full with this: > > Event Type: Error > Event Source: XMail > Event Category: None > Event ID: 0 > Date: 09/04/2007 > Time:

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-09 Thread Ana Paula Fernandes
Hi, I using 1.25-pre02 without problem, i have upgrade to 1.25-pre04 and my "Event Log" has full with this: Event Type: Error Event Source: XMail Event Category: None Event ID: 0 Date: 09/04/2007 Time: 23:17:00 User: N/A Computer: SERVER Description

[xmail] Re: 1.25-pre04 ...

2007-04-09 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > I made 1.25-pre04: > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre04.tar.gz > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre04.win32bin.zip > > There are two changes, pretty big: > > 1) DNS resolver code completely changed > > I Needed to cleanup the D