[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Harald Schneider
Everything works fine now, it was a config issue in /etc/mailer.conf. Nothing XMail related. 1.23 still does its job and all things are up and running! THanks! --Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > >> I also added DEFAULT_DOMAIN to the sendmail script

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > > I also added DEFAULT_DOMAIN to the sendmail script - same effect! > Would be nice, if some other OpenBSD users could test this ... Try to add a: printf("DEFAULT_DOMAIN = '%s'\n", getenv(DEFAULT_DOMAIN)); at the beginning of SendMail.cpp and rebu

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Harald Schneider
I also added DEFAULT_DOMAIN to the sendmail script - same effect! Would be nice, if some other OpenBSD users could test this ... --Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > >> It's exported in XMail's startup script. However adding it to >> sendmail.xmail.sh

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Jeff Buehler wrote: > Here is another verification that it builds fine on FreeBSD 5.4. I > haven't tried running it yet. No one with NetBSD/Solaris? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Jeff Buehler
Here is another verification that it builds fine on FreeBSD 5.4. I haven't tried running it yet. Jeff Davide Libenzi wrote: >I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs >versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the >following version: >

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > It's exported in XMail's startup script. However adding it to > sendmail.xmail.sh does make no difference ... Well, check again. The XMail startup script does not matter here, since it is not XMail that does fill it up. It is XMail's sendmail. -

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Harald Schneider
It's exported in XMail's startup script. However adding it to sendmail.xmail.sh does make no difference ... --Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > >> Has anyone tested if system mails arrive on OpenBSD 3.7 ? >> >> If I do >> #mail root >> Subject: test

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > Has anyone tested if system mails arrive on OpenBSD 3.7 ? > > If I do > #mail root > Subject: test > test > .. > > ... then the message stays in resending state without any SLOG created: > > [127.0.0.1]:0;[127.0.0.1]:0;Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:35:17 +0200

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Harald Schneider
Has anyone tested if system mails arrive on OpenBSD 3.7 ? If I do #mail root Subject: test test .. ... then the message stays in resending state without any SLOG created: [127.0.0.1]:0;[127.0.0.1]:0;Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:35:17 +0200 local.net L34FB mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rcpt to: <> Receiv

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Sasa Stupar
--On 12. oktober 2005 16:13 -0700 Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some > BSDs versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the > following version: > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.23-pre01.tar.gz > > Thank yo

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > You're the best! > It works perfeclty now. Even the stuck mails from the previous build are > delivered instantly. > > Can you tell which problem caused this behavious? Something thread related ? The gethostby{name,addr}_r are not available, so XMai

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-12 Thread Harald Schneider
You're the best! It works perfeclty now. Even the stuck mails from the previous build are delivered instantly. Can you tell which problem caused this behavious? Something thread related ? Thanks again, Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote: > >> Oh, yes. It is

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-12 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote: > >> Oh, yes. It is send you these emails, as you can see from the headers >> :-) One other thing, I've been watching the logs as I ran it and it >> seems to be a bit more responsive in sending out SMTP email. Be

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-12 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote: > Oh, yes. It is send you these emails, as you can see from the headers > :-) One other thing, I've been watching the logs as I ran it and it > seems to be a bit more responsive in sending out SMTP email. Before it > would sit for a bit, a minute or two, be

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-12 Thread Rene Rivera
Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote: > >>Davide Libenzi wrote: >> >>>I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs >>>versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the >>>following version: >> >>No problems so far, on OpenB

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-12 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote: > > Davide Libenzi wrote: > >> I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs >> versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the >> following version: > > No problems so far, on OpenBSD 3.7. But mine is a very

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-12 Thread Rene Rivera
Davide Libenzi wrote: > I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs > versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the > following version: No problems so far, on OpenBSD 3.7. But mine is a very low traffic server so I only tend to see the get