On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, RaveRod wrote:
> Hmm... after doing that... "ps ux" contains this:
>
> root 12259 0.5 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
> /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail
> root 12261 0.0 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
> /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail
> root 12262 0.0 0.
hmidt
Sent: Monday, 19 April 2004 10:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Excessive memory usage with v1.18
> Should there be so many instances of Xmail?
>
Yes - in my opinion thats quiet normal (because every thread/instances
is shown as a single running process)
perhaps try:
> Should there be so many instances of Xmail?
>
Yes - in my opinion thats quiet normal (because every thread/instances
is shown as a single running process)
perhaps try:
$ ps faux | grep XMail
and you will see that the first XMail is the one you have seen with your
"old" ps-command before exp
lundi 19 avril 2004 at 13:25:11, you said :
RaveRod> Hmm... after doing that... "ps ux" contains this:
RaveRod> /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail
RaveRod> root 12286 0.0 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
RaveRod> /var/MailRoot/bin/Xmail
RaveRod> Should there be so many instances of Xmail?
Hmm... after doing that... "ps ux" contains this:
root 12259 0.5 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
/var/MailRoot/bin/XMail
root 12261 0.0 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
/var/MailRoot/bin/XMail
root 12262 0.0 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
/var/MailRo
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
RaveRod> Behalf Of Pascal de R.
RaveRod> Sent: Monday, 19 April 2004 6:58 PM
RaveRod> To: RaveRod
RaveRod> Subject: [xmail] Re: Excessive memory usage with v1.18
RaveRod> Hi RaveRod,
RaveRod> lundi 19 avril 2004 at 04:18:54, you said :
RaveRod>> I&#x
Is that required for kernel v2.4.22?? I didn't think it was.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pascal de R.
Sent: Monday, 19 April 2004 6:58 PM
To: RaveRod
Subject: [xmail] Re: Excessive memory usage with v1.18
Hi RaveRod,
lundi 19
Hi RaveRod,
lundi 19 avril 2004 at 04:18:54, you said :
RaveRod> I'm running XMail with the "sa_filter" and
RaveRod> "Antivirus Filter". Neither of
RaveRod> those filters should matter though because it's
RaveRod> XMail itself using the RAM.
RaveRod> Here is the "ps ux" output:
RaveRod> USE
Never mind. My servers screwing up with RAM usage through the roof.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RaveRod
Sent: Monday, 19 April 2004 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Excessive memory usage with v1.18
Hey guys. I'm running
