[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-13 Thread John Kielkopf
Davide Libenzi wrote: > > >A pre-data filter can work just fine here. > > > Yes, but being able to set something like "mail-auth 0.0.0.0:587,..." in server.tab would be better ;) -John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO

[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-12 Thread Shiloh Jennings
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Tracy wrote: > More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user = submission &g

[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-11 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Tracy wrote: > More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user submission > of email independent of location. > > MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires authentication. > MTA-to-MTA submissions not allowed here. > > SMTP (port 25) - MTA-

[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread Shiloh Jennings
I would also really like to be able to do this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = On Behalf Of John Kielkopf Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 9:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port Exactly what I'm trying

[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread John Kielkopf
Exactly what I'm trying to do. Useful for clients that use the ever growing list of ISPs that block port 25. Tracy wrote: >More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user submission >of email independent of location. > >MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires

[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread Tracy
More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user submission of email independent of location. MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires authentication. MTA-to-MTA submissions not allowed here. SMTP (port 25) - MTA-to-MTA submissions, doesn't require authenticatio

[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread Chris L. Franklin
Problably whats to have a port like 26 that seen only from the lan and does require auth smtp. But still have port 25 visable from the wan/lan and have it still require Auth-smtp. -- Chris L. Franklin -- Veeresh Khanorkar wrote: >John Kielkopf wrote: > > > >>Is it possible on Xmail to force

[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread Veeresh Khanorkar
John Kielkopf wrote: >Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the >connection was established on? > >Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 (MSA). I >want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as normal, >but I want to require auth

[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-09 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, John Kielkopf wrote: > Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the > connection was established on? > > Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 (MSA). I > want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as normal, > b