Sorry.
Wrong reply (as if you didn't guess).
I'll go kill myself now.
- Original Message -
From: "Ricco Valenti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: IMAP Service in XMail
>
>
OTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:45 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: IMAP Service in XMail
>
> Tracy wrote:
>
> > mail server is running on - but still a lot of overhead, especially for
> > MIME encoded messages (it's necessary to read the en
At 00:45 6/6/2002 +0200, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> > mail server is running on - but still a lot of overhead, especially for
> > MIME encoded messages (it's necessary to read the entire message to
> > determine if there are file attachments, because it's necessary to see
> each
> > content-type en
Hi Davide,
I think you have some vision how to organize e-mail at POP3 server
instead of using IMAP. I personally have migrated to IMAP because of
buggy e-mail client (Outlook Express), - with message rules to sort
incoming messages into different mailboxes it often forget that it had
tak
Tracy wrote:
> mail server is running on - but still a lot of overhead, especially for
> MIME encoded messages (it's necessary to read the entire message to
> determine if there are file attachments, because it's necessary to see each
> content-type entry in the message).
You don't have to d
At 15:00 6/5/2002 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>status info, etc... also the server has to perform tasks that are not
>usually done by a server ( like parsing mime files ) and this increase
>also the cpu utilization.
Amen to that... I'm in the process of writing a web based client for
reading e
I hope you are implementing IMAP as a separate module/program and not
bloating xmail server for the rest of us. Is this right?
Bill
>--
>From: Davide Libenzi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:00 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:53:48 -0700 (PDT), Davide Libenzi wrote:
>> Ok Davide, Chill Out. I ack your reason.
>
>one of the other reasons why i'm taking imap dev easy is because i did not
>really have tons of requests for it. 90% of internet users are still using
>pop3 and 70% of imap users are usi
Ok Davide, Chill Out. I ack your reason.
-Veeresh
-Original Message-
From: Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [xmail] Re: IMAP Service in XMail
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:
>
> Good
> Good, so you had already begun the work, well if you still can send it to
me, on my
> own risks, I need it pretty badly. And as such I am in no mood of other
ones to be
> installed, since the flexibility of XMail is so much tempting. Please do
reply back.
i would like to (pre)alpha/beta-test th
Good, so you had already begun the work, well if you still can send it to me, on my
own risks, I need it pretty badly. And as such I am in no mood of other ones to be
installed, since the flexibility of XMail is so much tempting. Please do reply back.
-Veeresh
On 3 Jun 2002 at 10:51, Davide Li
11 matches
Mail list logo
