[xmail] Re: SMTP filter thoughts

2004-04-29 Thread Mikhail
TECTED]> To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date : Tuesday, 27 April, 2004 07:00 PM Sub : [xmail] Re: SMTP filter thoughts > At 17.49 27/04/04 +0200, you wrote:> > >I don't want a script that> >extracts the mail and then runs the command line scanner on the the> >directory. or do y

[xmail] Re: SMTP filter thoughts

2004-04-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> If your filter script parses the F-PROT virus report and finds an > embedded virus, it can modify the xmail message header simply and not > propagate the virus further so no SA daemon gets bothered later. The thingy is that I want to reject MSGs at SMTP level, but that must be (REAL-)user-based

[xmail] Re: SMTP filter thoughts

2004-04-27 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 17.49 27/04/04 +0200, you wrote: >I don't want a script that >extracts the mail and then runs the command line scanner on the the >directory. or do you know command line scanners that can read mail formats >and extract them? F-PROT for DOS - and, I think, all other versions - can read the @@FI

[xmail] Re: SMTP filter thoughts

2004-04-27 Thread Alan Snyder \(home\)
Hi Sönke If you run SpamAssassin, I assume, via filters, you pass each e-mail to the SA client/daemon and do something based on SA numerical index. This same model is useful for the AV product F-PROT. Working in our xmail server, F-PROT seems to recognize embedded viri which may or may not be bu