On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Henri van Riel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I decided to give glst a try. Mostly out of curiosity 'cause I don't
> receive that much spam at all... yet... :(
>
> First, it took me a while to figure out how to pass the --cfg
> parameter to the glst binary but I've got that figured
> GLST defaults to 0 as generic error code in case something happen. In that
> way messages can go through w/out causing any problems. You can use the
> "generr" command line or config option to change it.
Thanks Davide. I've disabled glst for the moment because emails are
being delayed for a very
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Henri van Riel wrote:
> > GLST defaults to 0 as generic error code in case something happen. In that
> > way messages can go through w/out causing any problems. You can use the
> > "generr" command line or config option to change it.
>
> Thanks Davide. I've disabled glst for
Hello !
Davide Libenzi a écrit :
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Henri van Riel wrote:
>
>>> GLST defaults to 0 as generic error code in case something happen. In that
>>> way messages can go through w/out causing any problems. You can use the
>>> "generr" command line or config option to change it.
>> Th
By the way, seen this about Grey Listing. Uses Packet Filter +
Spamassassin :
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2007/01/18/greylisting-with-pf.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "he
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Henri van Riel
>Envoy=E9 : samedi 24 f=E9vrier 2007 08:59
>=C0 : Davide Libenzi
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
>
>
>> GLST defaults to 0 as generic error co
roupeab.com with [XMail 1.24 ESMTP Server]
> id for from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:52:22 +0100
> Received: by pau.groupeab.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
> id ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:52:22 +0100
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PRO
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Filip Supera wrote:
> Hello !
>
> Davide Libenzi a écrit :
> > On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Henri van Riel wrote:
> >
> >>> GLST defaults to 0 as generic error code in case something happen. In that
> >>> way messages can go through w/out causing any problems. You can use the
> >>> "
Davide Libenzi a écrit :
>> Can you show us your glst.conf ?
>
> That's a kinda intimate question :D
> Nothing special, just 30 minutes delay plus whitelist for a few networks.
This G-stringed answer is OK :-) Thanks !
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the bo
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Henri van Riel
>Envoy=E9 : lundi 26 f=E9vrier 2007 20:16
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
>
>> Are you sure your server or connexio
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Henri van Riel
>> Envoy=E9 : lundi 26 f=E9vrier 2007 20:16
>> =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>> Objet : [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> First, for incoming mail to You from the list, I think Davide can =
> confirm if
> xmailserver.org mail server have some waiting mail from the list for =
> you and
> what is the cause for this 'hold' if any.
It uses GLST, so if it's the first time you
Hello Davide,
> It uses GLST, so if it's the first time you post (or if it's a
> looong time that you do not post), you get an up to 30 minutes
> delay.
I'm still one email short though! ;-) Yesterday morning (26th, 9am)
I've sent an email to this list. Others have replied to it but I
haven't rec
> You must have some serious mis-configuration, since GLST works
> flawlessy in all my boxes.
Hmmm... could be. My last email to this list took 48 hours to be
delivered... Your reply took only 3 minutes though.
My setup is a bit strange. My primary MX points to my ip but my isp
blocks port 25. So
"Henri van Riel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:56 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
>> You must have some serious mis-configuration, since GLST works
>> flawlessy in all my boxes.
>
> Hmmm... could be. My last email to this
If all your incoming e-mail has to go through your ISP then there is no
point in greylisting since your server will only be talking to one other
server, your ISPs server.
Bill
>--
>
>> You must have some serious mis-configuration, since GLST works
>> flawlessy in all my boxes.
>
>Hmmm...
Hallo Ivo!
Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 4:31:59 PM, you wrote:
>> First, for incoming mail to You from the list, I think Davide can =
>> confirm if
>> xmailserver.org mail server have some waiting mail from the list for =
>> you and
>> what is the cause for this 'hold' if any.
>>
>> Second, doing
"Henri van Riel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ivo Smits"
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 7:43 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
> Hallo Ivo!
>
> Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 4:31:59 PM, you wrote:
>
>>> First, for incoming mail
>-Message d'origine-
>Date: 27/02/07 19:43
>Objet: [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
>
>Hallo Ivo!
Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 4:31:59 PM, you wrote:
>> First, for incoming mail to You from the list, I think Davide can =
>> confirm if
>> xmailse
>-Message d'origine-
>De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>A: xmail@xmailserver.org
>Date: 01/03/07 19:55
>Objet: [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
>
>Hello Henri,
>
>Your mail arrived almost exactly 2 days late.
>The headers of the mail I received:
>
>Recei
20 matches
Mail list logo
