[xmail] Re: local sending problem SOLVED

2003-10-23 Thread webmaster
Thanks, doing what you said solved it completely. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem >That particular subnet designation wo

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread webmaster
Thx I will try in the morning and see how it does. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem >That particular subnet designation wo

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread Tracy
>That particular subnet designation would whitelist 8 addresses from >192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.15 Typo again... That should be "would whitelist 16 addresses", not 8... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general h

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread Tracy
At 11:02 10/22/2003, webmaster wrote: > >"192.168.0.1/28""WhiteList=1" > >This subnetting art confuses me.. What am I actually doing here? That particular subnet designation would whitelist 8 addresses from 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.15 You can look at it this way - IP addresses are, unde

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread webmaster
This subnetting art confuses me.. What am I actually doing here? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem At 10:16 10/22/2003, Tracy

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread Tracy
At 10:16 10/22/2003, Tracy wrote: >"192.168.0.1/28'"WhiteList=1" Um... Typo there - the ' after the /28 should be a " - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread Tracy
me so much trouble? > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Garnice >Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:23 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem > > > >Do you have anything in Cu

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread webmaster
half Of Eric Garnice Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem Do you have anything in CustMapsList??? XMail could just be waiting for the RBL queries to be returned. I've seen this before. - Original Message -

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread webmaster
Tracy I dont think I am using any DNSBLs OR RNDS How would I check? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem OK, if it was sitting with

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread Eric Garnice
eded I will test for longer time frames if you need me too. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem >

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread Tracy
need me too. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy >Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:12 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem > > >At 09:03 10/22/2003, webmaster wrote: > >

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread webmaster
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem At 09:03 10/22/2003, webmaster wrote: >I tested in the early hours today and this is what happ

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread Tracy
At 09:03 10/22/2003, webmaster wrote: >I tested in the early hours today and this is what happend. > >I cut our isp connection and I was able to send an email internally for the >early 1-2 minutes or so after the internet was shut off, then it got flakey. > >I couldnt even telnet to it. When you

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-22 Thread webmaster
ISP fails. It must have something to do with our DNS here but what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of webmaster Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem "If it doesn

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-20 Thread webmaster
ROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem Does it not work at all when the net conneciton is down, or does it not work intermittantly when the net connection is down? The thing about Windows and DNS client s

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-20 Thread Tracy
en >though everything is set to use the local stuff. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy >Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:08 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem > > &g

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-20 Thread webmaster
ocal stuff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: local sending problem At 13:02 10/20/2003, webmaster wrote: >It appears that if my forwarders are not corr

[xmail] Re: local sending problem

2003-10-20 Thread Tracy
At 13:02 10/20/2003, webmaster wrote: >It appears that if my forwarders are not correct or my isp goes down. I >cannot send mail internally. > >Task 'email - Sending' reported error (0x8004210B) : 'The operation >timed out waiting for a response from the sending (SMTP) server. If you >continue to r