CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: security hole, configuration error, or rfc compilance?
>
> > but i would prefer that xmail server forces smtp auth if the MAIL_FROM
and
> > RCPT are local and the same.
> >
> &g
> but i would prefer that xmail server forces smtp auth if the MAIL_FROM and
> RCPT are local and the same.
>
> the rcpt accout is local, so you can think we don't need auth, but the
> sender is also local, and so there xmail could force auth.
I send lots of mail from other places using my work
hi davide,
> what the hell are you talking about ? you can send me an email even using
:
>
> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
but i would prefer that xmail server forces smtp auth if the MAIL_FROM and
RCPT are local and the same.
the rcpt accout is local, so you can
> sorry i do not get this one. the recipient is local, what the heck does it
> mean that the sender is local too. if you want auth even for local
> accounts you've to set "mail-auth", but your server won't work on the
> internet.
Yes, maybe it makes no sence that i write a mail from an local acc
