Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.2

2003-01-12 Thread XulChris
On Sunday 12 January 2003 11:06 pm, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:02:05 -0700 > > Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks to a nice link error my extensive testing failed to find, there's > > a new 0.62.2 release. Enjoy: > > > > http://x.mame.net > > Rom verification th

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.2

2003-01-12 Thread XulChris
On Sunday 12 January 2003 07:02 pm, Lawrence Gold wrote: > Thanks to a nice link error my extensive testing failed to find, there's a > new 0.62.2 release. Enjoy: hi, i just got through playing a game of xevious and after I finsihed, the keyboard was all screwey like the alt-key was permanently

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.2

2003-01-12 Thread XulChris
On Sunday 12 January 2003 07:02 pm, Lawrence Gold wrote: > Thanks to a nice link error my extensive testing failed to find, there's a > new 0.62.2 release. Enjoy: # The game window should no longer open twice on startup in most cases. One known exception is Pac-Man with artwork enabled. This se

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.2

2003-01-12 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:02:05 -0700 Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to a nice link error my extensive testing failed to find, there's > a new 0.62.2 release. Enjoy: > > http://x.mame.net Rom verification that involves the chd files still appears to be broken: ./xmame.x1

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.2

2003-01-12 Thread XulChris
On Sunday 12 January 2003 07:02 pm, Lawrence Gold wrote: > Thanks to a nice link error my extensive testing failed to find, there's a > new 0.62.2 release. Enjoy: Lawrence, can we change the makefile optmization options to gcc3.x values I am currently using CFLAGS= -O3 -march=i686 -Wall -Wn

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.1

2003-01-12 Thread Shyouzou Sugitani
Lawrence Gold wrote: > - Fixed a couple of files so that they include > instead of the deprecated . (Nico) This breaks alsa 0.5.x support in src/unix/sysdep/dsp-drivers/alsa.c. Maybe it's time to remove 0.5.x support -- Shyouzou Sugitani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

Re: [Xmame] compile problems

2003-01-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 08:18:12PM -0600, ARTMAN wrote: > I just dl'ed the new version of xmame and ran across some errors prior > to the linking. I had no problems compiling the previous version. My fault. The 0.62.2 patch should fix it. ___ Xmame m

[Xmame] compile problems

2003-01-12 Thread ARTMAN
I just dl'ed the new version of xmame and ran across some errors prior to the linking. I had no problems compiling the previous version. Here's what happens at the very end... Archiving ../../xmame.obj/unix.x11/osdepend.a ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/artman/tmp/xmame-0.62.1/src/unix' Co

[Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.2

2003-01-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
Thanks to a nice link error my extensive testing failed to find, there's a new 0.62.2 release. Enjoy: http://x.mame.net ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.1

2003-01-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 06:56:17PM -0500, Caleb Shay wrote: > Problem: > Using gcc 3.2.1 Ah, shit, I forgot to try building xmame after merging the MESS 0.62.1 files. Oh well, expect a patch or 0.62.2 very soon.. ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.1

2003-01-12 Thread XulChris
On Sunday 12 January 2003 02:17 pm, Lawrence Gold wrote: > xmame/xmess-0.62.1 is out. Since MAME 0.63 was released today, I didn't > want to delay 0.62.1 any more; faster blit-time rotation and other changes > will just have to wait. hi attempting to port to 0.63, I think the prep-new-mame script

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.1

2003-01-12 Thread Benjamin FRANCOIS
On 12 Jan 2003 18:56:17 -0500 Caleb Shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem: > Using gcc 3.2.1 > > Archiving xmame.obj/neogeo.a ... > Compiling src/vidhrdw/vector.c ... > Linking xmame.x11 ... > xmame.obj/williams.a(williams.o)(.text+0x8e4): In function > `williams_cvsd_init': > : undefined ref

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.1

2003-01-12 Thread Caleb Shay
However, xmess builds fine, so it's xmame specific. Caleb On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 19:00, Brian Hall wrote: > I get same problem when using gcc-2.96 (Mandrake 8.2) and distcc. > > On 12 Jan 2003 18:56:17 -0500 > Caleb Shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Problem: > > Using gcc 3.2.1 > > > > Arch

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.1

2003-01-12 Thread Brian Hall
I get same problem when using gcc-2.96 (Mandrake 8.2) and distcc. On 12 Jan 2003 18:56:17 -0500 Caleb Shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem: > Using gcc 3.2.1 > > Archiving xmame.obj/neogeo.a ... > Compiling src/vidhrdw/vector.c ... > Linking xmame.x11 ... > xmame.obj/williams.a(williams.o)

Re: [Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.1

2003-01-12 Thread Caleb Shay
Problem: Using gcc 3.2.1 Archiving xmame.obj/neogeo.a ... Compiling src/vidhrdw/vector.c ... Linking xmame.x11 ... xmame.obj/williams.a(williams.o)(.text+0x8e4): In function `williams_cvsd_init': : undefined reference to `mame_find_cpu_index' xmame.obj/williams.a(williams.o)(.text+0xa8f): In funct

[Xmame] xmame/xmess-0.62.1

2003-01-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
xmame/xmess-0.62.1 is out. Since MAME 0.63 was released today, I didn't want to delay 0.62.1 any more; faster blit-time rotation and other changes will just have to wait. As usual, thanks to all who have contributed in one way or another. The full source tarball can be downloaded from h