[ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-vmmouse 12.6.1

2008-10-24 Thread Philip Langdale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brown paper bag release. There was a pointless call to iopl() in the detection utility which made it non-portable to non-Linux operating systems. Philip Langdale (2): Remove call to iopl(). It's not portable and isn't necessary. Bump for

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.4.98

2008-10-24 Thread Jesse Barnes
This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I hope to do on Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into build issues, etc. Looks like we won't get *all* the blockers fixed, but I think we did pretty well. Changelog from 2.4.97 below. Thanks, Jesse Adam

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-vmmouse 12.6.1

2008-10-24 Thread Philip Langdale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brown paper bag release. There was a pointless call to iopl() in the detection utility which made it non-portable to non-Linux operating systems. Philip Langdale (2): Remove call to iopl(). It's not portable and isn't necessary. Bump for

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-24 Thread Colin Guthrie
Peter Hutterer wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 08:50:20AM +0200, Søren Hauberg wrote: 2008/10/24 Peter Hutterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Touchscreen support (courtesy of Søren) enables devices that report only BTN_TOUCH capability, but no BTN_LEFT, BTN_RIGHT, etc. Great! The only major thing left is

Re: modular: Changes to 'master'

2008-10-24 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:51:45AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 18:15 +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: Is there a single technical reason why shipping both is a problem? For the same reason the kernel avoids shipping multiple drivers for the same hardware -- we want a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-24 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:43:03AM +0200, Søren Hauberg wrote: Yeah, I can understand that. As I think I've made quite clear in previous posts: I'm stupid. That is, I don't really know X. So, here's a stupid question [1]: the server scales from what ever the driver reports to some range. So,

ati radeon : hangs between CTRL+ALT+Fx's

2008-10-24 Thread Sebastian Glita
Hi, I have an ugly problem with X hangs. Just a while ago, before xorg-server 1.5.2, xf86-video-ati used to work perfect, even with hibernation. Now xf86-video-ati from git hangs by blanking 2 thirds of the screen, when switching CTRL+ALT+Fx or resuming from hibernation. DRI option enabled or

Re: ati radeon : hangs between CTRL+ALT+Fx's

2008-10-24 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Glita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have an ugly problem with X hangs. Just a while ago, before xorg-server 1.5.2, xf86-video-ati used to work perfect, even with hibernation. Now xf86-video-ati from git hangs by blanking 2 thirds of the screen,

Re: failed to find pci graphics card - Self compiled xorg from git

2008-10-24 Thread Bill Crawford
On Friday 24 October 2008 15:43:44 Bill Crawford wrote: On Friday 24 October 2008 15:37:57 Mateusz Jan Dominikowski wrote: BusidPCI:0:1:1 Try 0:1:0 Ignore me, I'm especially blind today. ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-24 Thread Søren Hauberg
2008/10/24 Peter Hutterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: it can be combined, if you specify the correct min/max range in the config (or you let it get picked up from the kernel). Then the driver doesn't need scaling, the server does it. For calibration, that doesn't work. Or to be more precise, it only

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-24 Thread Colin Guthrie
Peter Hutterer wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:59:25AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: It seems that my usb mouse wanted to make double clicks rather than single clicks when I tried this driver. Not overly sure why! When trying to update the xserver and getting inspired by the Fedora patches,

xf86-video-intel-2.5.0

2008-10-24 Thread Bogdan Burlacu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I've compiled the latest kernel, 2.6.28-rc1 which is supposed to have GEM support and also installed xf86-video-intel-2.5.0. I use: - - xorg-server-1.5.2 - - mesa-7.2 - - libdrm-2.4 How can I tell if gem works? So far glxgears fpd dropped

Re: [PATCH] candidate patches for server-1.5-branch inclusion

2008-10-24 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Rémi Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Here's a branch with all the patches that we currently plan on shipping in Gentoo. http://www.lri.fr/~cardona/git/xserver.git (server-1.5-branch) The first 37 patches are backports from git master, basically all

Re: Lockup on intel dri

2008-10-24 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 10:55 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi, I'm wondering if anyone can advice of how to address this lockup? I'm running mesa master from a couple days ago + a few minor patches (quite similar to the Fedora dev package) + xserver 1.5.2 + patches (very similar to the

Re: xf86-video-intel-2.5.0

2008-10-24 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 18:40 +0300, Bogdan Burlacu wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I've compiled the latest kernel, 2.6.28-rc1 which is supposed to have GEM support and also installed xf86-video-intel-2.5.0. I use: - - xorg-server-1.5.2 - - mesa-7.2 - -

Re: Ansification of X.Org code other cleanup work

2008-10-24 Thread Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade
Peter Breitenlohner wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alan Coopersmith wrote: If someone wanted to organize a janitorial squad to tackle these and help new people work through them to get to the point where they were ready for commit access, we'd love you forever (or at least until you turn us

Re: xf86-video-intel-2.5.0

2008-10-24 Thread Bogdan Burlacu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 18:40 +0300, Bogdan Burlacu wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I've compiled the latest kernel, 2.6.28-rc1 which is supposed to have GEM support and also installed

Re: [PATCH] Supporting pretty window destory effects in metacity-clutter

2008-10-24 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:14 +0100, Robert Bragg wrote: There is another case though where the application is forcefully closed and does not control the order in which windows are destroyed. If an app is killed then control moves to the server: In the server: CloseDownClient() ends up

Re: [PATCH] Supporting pretty window destory effects in metacity-clutter

2008-10-24 Thread Robert Bragg
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 16:19 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:14 +0100, Robert Bragg wrote: There is another case though where the application is forcefully closed and does not control the order in which windows are destroyed. If an app is killed then control moves to

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-10-24 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 01:59:15PM -0400, Jan Engelhardt wrote: I know very well that CAB is the kill switch, but it just occurred to me that it triggered by accident nevertheless. I was editing around in a graphical editor, where word-based movement is done with Ctrl. Certain commands require