Re: Error: Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display "my_machine_name:1.0".

2009-09-02 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Peng Yu wrote: > Would you please let me know if there is an easy way to fix the bug or > where to find the package which has the bug fixed? To just make the message go away, ask the GTK maintainers what version of GTK they have or will fix the bug in, and upgrade to it. Packages depend on dis

Re: Error: Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display "my_machine_name:1.0".

2009-09-02 Thread Peng Yu
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Peng Yu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I recently installed gtk+-2.16.6 on my machine from source code. I >> also installed a few other packages that are required by gtk+, which >> include libXrandr-1.3.0 (compiled from source code). >> >> Then, I

[ANNOUNCE] libX11 1.1.6

2009-09-02 Thread Peter Hutterer
This update is for those still using libX11-1.1.x. A single commit addressing Bug 20897. http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20897 A commit cherry-picked to 1.1.5 caused some applications to hang at startup. The fix has been sitting on the 1.1 branch for a while now, it's time for a releas

Re: xserver 1.6.3.901: lost mouse scroll wheel

2009-09-02 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Frederik Himpe wrote: > On one of my machines where I upgraded to Mandriva's new xserver 1.6.3.901 > I lost the mouse scroll wheel. The mouse is a Logitech MX510 USB mouse. > Clicking the scroll wheel to paste stuff, still works, but scrolling does > not work at all. The little

xserver 1.6.3.901: lost mouse scroll wheel

2009-09-02 Thread Frederik Himpe
On one of my machines where I upgraded to Mandriva's new xserver 1.6.3.901 I lost the mouse scroll wheel. The mouse is a Logitech MX510 USB mouse. Clicking the scroll wheel to paste stuff, still works, but scrolling does not work at all. The little "up" and "down" buttons above and under the w

Re: problem getting pseudocolor

2009-09-02 Thread Neil Smith
On Sep 2, 2009, at 7:32 AM, Patrick O'Donnell wrote: >> From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= >> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:45:36 +0200 >> Sender: xorg-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org >> >> On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 09:41 +0100, David Gerard wrote: >>> 2009/9/2 Jerome Glisse : >>> ... DEMANDS 8-bit col

Re: problem getting pseudocolor

2009-09-02 Thread Patrick O'Donnell
>From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= >Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:45:36 +0200 >Sender: xorg-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org > >On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 09:41 +0100, David Gerard wrote: >> 2009/9/2 Jerome Glisse : >> ... DEMANDS 8-bit colour, and won't run in 24-bit colour. ... > >Those who need that

Re: problem getting pseudocolor

2009-09-02 Thread David Gerard
2009/9/2 Michel Dänzer : > On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 09:41 +0100, David Gerard wrote: >> 2009/9/2 Jerome Glisse : >> > We don't test/use pseudocolor much, i don't even know if it's supposed >> > to work. Why do you want pseudocolor ? You should really stick with >> > RGB32bits visual. >> I would gues

Re: problem getting pseudocolor

2009-09-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 09:41 +0100, David Gerard wrote: > 2009/9/2 Jerome Glisse : > > > We don't test/use pseudocolor much, i don't even know if it's supposed > > to work. Why do you want pseudocolor ? You should really stick with > > RGB32bits visual. > > > I would guess: shitty, shitty vertic

Re: problem getting pseudocolor

2009-09-02 Thread David Gerard
2009/9/2 Jerome Glisse : > We don't test/use pseudocolor much, i don't even know if it's supposed > to work. Why do you want pseudocolor ? You should really stick with > RGB32bits visual. I would guess: shitty, shitty vertical-market proprietary software that thinks it's 1990 and DEMANDS 8-bit c

Re: problem getting pseudocolor

2009-09-02 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:24 -0500, Neil Smith wrote: > CentOS 5.3 on dual-boot Apple Aluminum iMac with ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT > card. > > If I specify in /etc/X11/xorg.conf a screen0 with depth 8, X11 can't > start up, giving error of 'invalid depth = -1'. > > First off, is this video capable

Re: kdrive - future plans

2009-09-02 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 09:50 +0200, Markus Brunner wrote: > Hi, > > I did have a look at the Xi810 for my atom board, just to realize that it did > not make the development as the former i810 driver, but can only be used with > the old i810 chipset. Well the name reflects this. > So I had a look

kdrive - future plans

2009-09-02 Thread Markus Brunner
Hi, I did have a look at the Xi810 for my atom board, just to realize that it did not make the development as the former i810 driver, but can only be used with the old i810 chipset. Well the name reflects this. So I had a look at newer xserver sources, hoping there has been some development. B