This one was released last week but I forgot to send the announce email.
Thanks to everyone for the reminders.
Just a single chance here, the requirement for xorg-macros 1.3.
Peter Hutterer (2):
Require macros 1.3 for XORG_DEFAULT_OPTIONS
libXxf86dga 1.1
git tag: libXxf86dga-1.1
htt
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Daniel Stone wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:13:57AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> >I still use xinit/startx to start X, and very much *do* consider it to
>> >be an essential part of X.
>>
>> +1000, Amen and hip hi
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
>
>
> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
>>> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
>>> katamari,
>>> now is the time to speak, as at the rate we're
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:13:57AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >I still use xinit/startx to start X, and very much *do* consider it to
> >be an essential part of X.
>
> +1000, Amen and hip hip hooray. I have never started X any other way, and
Hello everybody,
just wanted to announce the availability of rev. 6 of my MPX/XI2 patch
for FreeGLUT (which is likely to be the final one for some time). Rev. 5
added support for modifier keys in the extension callbacks while rev. 6
also adds support for legacy callbacks for backwards compatibilit
> > Now I wonder whether there is a wiki or such describing who is working
> > on which features / applications to make them work smoothly with mpx
> > features representing a global state of this all?
> I am working on mpx support in synergy+ [1] for the Deskotheque [2] project :)
There's also my
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:15:12 -0700
>> From: Alan Coopersmith
>>
>> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> >> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
>> >> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Now that whot has heroically finished the xserver-1.7 release, we're
> nearing the finish line for the X11R7.5 release.
>
...
> I'm uncertain about xf86-video-openchrome - it's not had a new release since
> last year, so I don't know if it's compatible with the Xorg ABI c
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:39:50PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>xf86-input-evdev 2.0.4*
> xf86-input-joystick 1.3.2*
> xf86-input-keyboard 1.3.1*
>xf86-input-mouse 1.3.0
Just one small change to ensure the output file is removed if busted (e.g.
if the filesystem is full).
Peter Hutterer (1):
xkbcomp 1.1.1
Rami Ylimaki (1):
xkbcomp: Remove output file if closing fails.
git tag: xkbcomp-1.1.1
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/app/xkbcomp-
> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:15:12 -0700
> From: Alan Coopersmith
>
> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
> >> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
> >> katamari,
> >> now is the time to speak, as at th
On Saturday 03 October 2009 11:11:32 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Didier Spaier wrote:
> > Thanks for the explanation Alan. I just can't find any clear definition
> > of "katamari" in Xorg's context, searching the wiki as well as this
> > mailing list
> >
> > :-\
>
> Sorry, it's what we call the X11R7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some minor janitorial work and several new man pages, thanks to the
conversion of a long lost Xv 2.2 API doc that was found behind the
bookcases in xorg-docs.
Alan Coopersmith (7):
Add README with pointers to mailing list, bugzilla & git repos
Didier Spaier wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation Alan. I just can't find any clear definition of
> "katamari" in Xorg's context, searching the wiki as well as this mailing list
> :-\
Sorry, it's what we call the X11R7.x releases in which we "roll up" a set of
individually released modules (the
On Saturday 03 October 2009 10:42:15 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Didier Spaier wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> >> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible versio
Didier Spaier wrote:
> On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
katamari,
now is the time to
On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
> >> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
> >> katamari,
> >> now is the time to speak, as at the rate w
17 matches
Mail list logo