On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
> >> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
> >> katamari,
> >> now is the time to speak, as at the rate w
Didier Spaier wrote:
> On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
katamari,
now is the time to
On Saturday 03 October 2009 10:42:15 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Didier Spaier wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> >> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible versio
Didier Spaier wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation Alan. I just can't find any clear definition of
> "katamari" in Xorg's context, searching the wiki as well as this mailing list
> :-\
Sorry, it's what we call the X11R7.x releases in which we "roll up" a set of
individually released modules (the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some minor janitorial work and several new man pages, thanks to the
conversion of a long lost Xv 2.2 API doc that was found behind the
bookcases in xorg-docs.
Alan Coopersmith (7):
Add README with pointers to mailing list, bugzilla & git repos
On Saturday 03 October 2009 11:11:32 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Didier Spaier wrote:
> > Thanks for the explanation Alan. I just can't find any clear definition
> > of "katamari" in Xorg's context, searching the wiki as well as this
> > mailing list
> >
> > :-\
>
> Sorry, it's what we call the X11R7
> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:15:12 -0700
> From: Alan Coopersmith
>
> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
> >> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
> >> katamari,
> >> now is the time to speak, as at th
Just one small change to ensure the output file is removed if busted (e.g.
if the filesystem is full).
Peter Hutterer (1):
xkbcomp 1.1.1
Rami Ylimaki (1):
xkbcomp: Remove output file if closing fails.
git tag: xkbcomp-1.1.1
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/app/xkbcomp-
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:39:50PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>xf86-input-evdev 2.0.4*
> xf86-input-joystick 1.3.2*
> xf86-input-keyboard 1.3.1*
>xf86-input-mouse 1.3.0
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Now that whot has heroically finished the xserver-1.7 release, we're
> nearing the finish line for the X11R7.5 release.
>
...
> I'm uncertain about xf86-video-openchrome - it's not had a new release since
> last year, so I don't know if it's compatible with the Xorg ABI c
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:15:12 -0700
>> From: Alan Coopersmith
>>
>> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> >> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
>> >> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
> > Now I wonder whether there is a wiki or such describing who is working
> > on which features / applications to make them work smoothly with mpx
> > features representing a global state of this all?
> I am working on mpx support in synergy+ [1] for the Deskotheque [2] project :)
There's also my
Hello everybody,
just wanted to announce the availability of rev. 6 of my MPX/XI2 patch
for FreeGLUT (which is likely to be the final one for some time). Rev. 5
added support for modifier keys in the extension callbacks while rev. 6
also adds support for legacy callbacks for backwards compatibilit
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:13:57AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >I still use xinit/startx to start X, and very much *do* consider it to
> >be an essential part of X.
>
> +1000, Amen and hip hip hooray. I have never started X any other way, and
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
>
>
> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>> If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
>>> a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
>>> katamari,
>>> now is the time to speak, as at the rate we're
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Daniel Stone wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:13:57AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> >I still use xinit/startx to start X, and very much *do* consider it to
>> >be an essential part of X.
>>
>> +1000, Amen and hip hi
This one was released last week but I forgot to send the announce email.
Thanks to everyone for the reminders.
Just a single chance here, the requirement for xorg-macros 1.3.
Peter Hutterer (2):
Require macros 1.3 for XORG_DEFAULT_OPTIONS
libXxf86dga 1.1
git tag: libXxf86dga-1.1
htt
17 matches
Mail list logo
