Am 02/18/2010 03:57 PM, Alan Coopersmith schrieb:
> or (3) have paying customers who want it to be supported, so it's
> worth them spending the time needed on it? (I have no knowledge
> of whether that's the case or not, it just seems like an obvious
> possibility that you overlooked, since Nvidi
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:37:49AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:18:47PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > As far as I can tell (and I'v
What kind of hardware are building it for?
If you're using nVidia(and their binary) you can use --disable-glx with the
xserver .config/autogen.sh and you won't need to build libGL/mesa at all.
There's some switches(.config --help) in Mesa which you should look at to
see what you need to build spe
Hi Guys,
In meat space, I've now had 2 people telling me that they've voted
in a certain way because they are really concerned about the "missing
money". This is a very high figure, given that I'm a nobody and I
don't even know any current X developers in person!
Reading this thread, I'm not
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:45, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:33:36PM -0800, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:44, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>> > There is little to no information about the X.org Foundation Boards
>> > financial handlings. Several years
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:18:47PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
> > > escape the office e
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:18:47PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I'm pretty uncomfortable with the suggestion here. No, wait, very
> uncomfortable. (Not to mention that if any misuse of funds _did_ go on
> here, then it sucks to be me, because if that was the case, then I got
> not a single cent f
On 18 February 2010 22:58, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
>> On 18 February 2010 22:46, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
xorg-server master isn't comp
On 18 February 2010 23:19, Alexander Lam wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
>> I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
> [snip]
>> And lastly the latest intel DRM code from drm-intel-next has the
>> following issue too:
>>
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.
On 18 February 2010 23:11, Xavier Chantry wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
>> I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
>>
>> xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
>>
>> ../doltcompile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
>> -I../include -I../hw/xf
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:59, Peter Winston wrote:
> The thing that suprises me is that there has been no discussion of "how do
> we update the vision and goals of x.org"
>
> The fact that we might be spending too much for hosting, or doing a poor job
> of accounting for expences is interesting,
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
> > escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
> > $US24k for travel sp
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Egbert Eich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
>> escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
>> $US24k for travel sponsors
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:50:40PM -0800, Corbin Simpson wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 2010 2:21 PM, "Peter Winston" wrote:
>>
>> The thing that suprises me is that there has been no discussion of
>> "how do we update the vision and goals of x.org"
>>
>> The fact that we might be spending too much for ho
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
> On 18 February 2010 22:46, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
>>> I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
>>>
>>> xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
>>>
>>> ../doltcompile x86_64-pc-
On 18 February 2010 22:46, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
>> I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
>>
>> xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
>>
>> ../doltcompile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
>> -I../include -I../hw/xfre
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
> escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
> $US24k for travel sponsorship (no joke), and something like $US5k lost
> to PayPal (t
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
> I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
>
> xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
>
> ../doltcompile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> -I../include -I../hw/xfree86/os-support -I../hw/xfree86/os-support/bus
> -I../hw/x
Quick list: x12, shatter, 3d for the Big Three, million char/s for Big
Three, multigpu xrandr, move some drivers back in. I think that's the bulk
of what we've talked about.
Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Feb 18, 2010 2:21 PM, "Peter Winston" wrote:
The thing that suprises
I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
../doltcompile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../include -I../hw/xfree86/os-support -I../hw/xfree86/os-support/bus
-I../hw/xfree86/common -I../hw/xfree86/dri -I../mi
-I../hw/xfree86/dri2 -
Sorry Daniel,
It's the Board's responsibility, and within the Board that of the Treasurer
who is responsible for representing to the Board the current financial
position of X.Org.
If it was successful, value received for money spent, you deserve credit for
proposing it. If it was financially i
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:33:36PM -0800, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:44, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > There is little to no information about the X.org Foundation Boards
> > financial handlings. Several years ago, several companies (at least one,
> > Sun) deposited a l
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:44, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> Since voting is officially ending today I have cast my votes just now...
> but i did not at all feel comfortable doing so.
>
> While we did start to get some insights in the Boards doings of the past
> year, these insights are very limited inde
Right. I am the outsider who will find out what is going on in there
and share that info with you the voter. If it is not too late, ...
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> I am not a member, which says something already. But in short
> everything surrounding the board has
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:10:52PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> Aside from that, it's not actually the popup window that's the issue it's
> the active grab.
These grabs are a PITA anyway, even when not using MPX. Once you've opened
a menu or a drop-down list, you can't do anything else. Can
I am not a member, which says something already. But in short
everything surrounding the board has never tempted to sign up or vote.
Apart from hosting a few servers i never knew what they were doing.
This situation has somewhat improved but it's still vague. At the
moment i still do not feel the n
Eeri Kask wrote:
> Am 17 Feb 2010 12:38:16, Alex Deucher schrieb:
>>> And aside from that, didn't you say earlier that the Intel
>>> driver actually has it removed and that it is official Xorg
>>> policy that keeping classic dual-screen alive is not intended?
>>>
>> Yes, the intel driver has remov
Since voting is officially ending today I have cast my votes just now...
but i did not at all feel comfortable doing so.
While we did start to get some insights in the Boards doings of the past
year, these insights are very limited indeed.
There are no transcripts nor minutes of meetings. Irc me
Eeri Kask writes:
> Am 17 Feb 2010 12:38:16, Alex Deucher schrieb:
>> > And aside from that, didn't you say earlier that the Intel
>> > driver actually has it removed and that it is official Xorg
>> > policy that keeping classic dual-screen alive is not intended?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, the intel driver
Am 17 Feb 2010 12:38:16, Alex Deucher schrieb:
> > And aside from that, didn't you say earlier that the Intel
> > driver actually has it removed and that it is official Xorg
> > policy that keeping classic dual-screen alive is not intended?
> >
>
> Yes, the intel driver has removed it. It's not p
30 matches
Mail list logo
