On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:59 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:16 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Michel Dänzer
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If the GLX implementation is to use DRI2CopyRegion for synchronization
> >>
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 16:02 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:59 am Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Michel Dänzer
> >>
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
Adam Jackson nwnk.net> writes:
>
> While true, there is exactly zero API in either of GL or Xv for
> specifying which CRTC to sync to if there's a choice. Adding this to
> DRI2 before having any way for a real rendering layer to consume it
> seems like gratuitous overdesign.
>
Btw. maybe this
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:59 am Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Michel Dänzer
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:09 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> >> On Tu
On Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:59 am Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Michel Dänzer
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:09 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On T
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 18:18 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:59 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > We can then add the CRTC to sync to as an argument
> > later if we find a case where the client really can make a better
> > decision than the server.
>
> I can think of such
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:59 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> We can then add the CRTC to sync to as an argument
> later if we find a case where the client really can make a better
> decision than the server.
I can think of such an imaginary case: imagine an NLE (video editor)
which only cares ab
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Michel Dänzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:09 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:27 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> >
>> >> For DRI2CopyRe
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:09 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:27 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> >> For DRI2CopyRegion, you're leaving it to the DDX driver to pick the CRTC
> >> to synchronize t
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 17:28 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> No that's why the existing scheme is better, it doesn't rely on
> random/cryptographical tokens. It just needs to be a unique handle
> that lets the server identify the right client to authenticate. If
> you can pass this token to the
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:09 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>
>> Everybody can talk to the DRM and create
>> a token, but only if you can pass it to the server over DRI2 protocol,
>> can you authenticate.
>
> Oh, so the coo
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:09 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Everybody can talk to the DRM and create
> a token, but only if you can pass it to the server over DRI2 protocol,
> can you authenticate.
Oh, so the cookie in the protocol is a client identifier of some kind.
In any case, 32 bits of u
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 11:54 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> The buffer types available? This is for when you want to check if,
> say, a DRI2_BUFFER_YUV is available, and if not fall back to something
> else?
I was thinking of the direct rendering libraries which it knows about,
but yeah, the a
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Michel Dänzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:11 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:41 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> > Generally, if DRI2CopyRegion seriously wants to be useful for
>> > synchronization purposes, it probably
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:27 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>> I think it'd be good if the authentication stuff could be made/kept
>> optional or at least not DRM specific. (I'm not sure GEM or the DRM in
>> general is within
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 17:58 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Keith talked me intro writing a spec for DRI2, which I grudgingly must
>> admit is a good idea. I used the randr spec as a template, except I
>> repla
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Kristian Høgsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Keith talked me intro writing a spec for DRI2, which I grudgingly must
> admit is a good idea. I used the randr spec as a template, except I
> replaced the flowery section dividers with a more fitting gears mot
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That mechanism could be basically the same as the existing
>> sync-to-vblank mechanisms, but with 'vertical blank' replaced by
>> 'compositing manager screen update'. So it would provide the client with
>> a way to express
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 19:34 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:11 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:41 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > > GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap needs the real front buffer.
> >
> > Sure, but that's not through DRI2, this just ref
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:11 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:41 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap needs the real front buffer.
>
> Sure, but that's not through DRI2, this just references the object as an
> X pixmap.
I don't understand what you me
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:41 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Sounds like the DRI1 authentication mechanism. :)
I don't know how DRI1 works... But, what I do want is a cookie of size
sufficient to avoid any potential for security compromise. 32 bits
doesn't seem like enough to me.
> GLX_EXT_texture_
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 12:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:41 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 08:46 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:27 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > I do wonder if DRI2GetBuffers should return the drawable
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:41 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 08:46 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:27 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > I do wonder if DRI2GetBuffers should return the drawable position
> > > relative to the origin of each buffer... guess
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 08:46 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:27 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > I think it'd be good if the authentication stuff could be made/kept
> > optional or at least not DRM specific. (I'm not sure GEM or the DRM in
> > general is within scope of this
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:27 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I think it'd be good if the authentication stuff could be made/kept
> optional or at least not DRM specific. (I'm not sure GEM or the DRM in
> general is within scope of this spec at all)
I have to admit that I'm not very excited by the ex
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 17:58 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Keith talked me intro writing a spec for DRI2, which I grudgingly must
> admit is a good idea. I used the randr spec as a template, except I
> replaced the flowery section dividers with a more fitting gears motif.
> It's still
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 17:58 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Keith talked me intro writing a spec for DRI2, which I grudgingly must
> admit is a good idea. I used the randr spec as a template, except I
> replaced the flowery section dividers with a more fitting gears motif.
> It's still
27 matches
Mail list logo
