On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:49:13PM -0400, Brett Smith wrote:
> Some of the developers who were packaging software for the machine
> pointed out that this license was unfortunate for them, because they
> were interested in getting GRUB running on the box as well, and of
> course, GPLv2-only is not a
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:49:13PM -0400, Brett Smith wrote:
>> When we started looking at software for the SiliconMotion hardware (as
>> part of evaluating how free software-friendly a particular machine was),
>> we found a modified d
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:49:13PM -0400, Brett Smith wrote:
> When we started looking at software for the SiliconMotion hardware (as
> part of evaluating how free software-friendly a particular machine was),
> we found a modified driver from the SiliconMotion company that seemed to
> have som
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:19:40PM -0400, Daniel Clark wrote:
> 2010/3/16 Bridgman, John :
> > Ahh, that makes sense -- so the relicensing from X11 to GPLv2 already
> > happened, and the proposed relicensing was going to be from GPLv2 to v3.
> > Asking if the code can be licensed back to X11
2010/3/16 Bridgman, John :
> Ahh, that makes sense -- so the relicensing from X11 to GPLv2 already
> happened, and the proposed relicensing was going to be from GPLv2 to v3.
> Asking if the code can be licensed back to X11 (allowing use in the X.org
> project) certainly sounds like a good next s
org; Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko; Bernie
Innocenti
Subject: RE: Yeelong and SiliconMotion driver: asking for developers
Hi everyone,
I'm sorry for the confusion that's sprung up around this issue. I hope I can
get everything clarified -- I think we're all really on
.org
Cc: Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko; Bernie Innocenti; Brett C Smith
Subject: Re: Yeelong and SiliconMotion driver: asking for developers
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:51:56AM +, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:51:56AM +, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:22:28PM -0430, Octavio Rossell wrote:
>> > The idea of this wiki:
>> > http://gnu.org.ve/~octavio/lemote/doku.php?id=siliconmotiondriver
>>
I said the text may contain bugs. This is one of them and I have fixed it.
Any Free Licence will work. The main problem here is a performance
behaviour.
Owain Ainsworth escribió:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:22:28PM -0430, Octavio Rossell wrote:
>> The idea of this wiki:
>> http://gnu.org.ve/~oct
Apart from minor bugs that are already largely solved, Yeelong video driver
suffers from performance issues related to video decoding.
The main problem, as I understand it, appears to be that the LynxEM chipset
can handle only packed YUV while most of the time frames are given as planar
YUV (I'm
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:51:56AM +, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:22:28PM -0430, Octavio Rossell wrote:
> > The idea of this wiki:
> > http://gnu.org.ve/~octavio/lemote/doku.php?id=siliconmotiondriver
> > is to collect all info for makin this easy. If any of you hav
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:22:28PM -0430, Octavio Rossell wrote:
> The idea of this wiki:
> http://gnu.org.ve/~octavio/lemote/doku.php?id=siliconmotiondriver
> is to collect all info for makin this easy. If any of you have more info
> or has a technical correction is ok (is on free editing mode) bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
