Re: Slow exaOffscreenAlloc ?

2008-12-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 15:23 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: We've got a few ideas to improve things for UXA performance still, so it may get better. It's already a win over EXA, since EXA's stuck with only 50MB of aperture space. [...] UXA makes the pixmap offscreen space be unified with 3D and

Re: Slow exaOffscreenAlloc ?

2008-12-10 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 11:52 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 15:23 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: We've got a few ideas to improve things for UXA performance still, so it may get better. It's already a win over EXA, since EXA's stuck with only 50MB of aperture space.

Re: Slow exaOffscreenAlloc ?

2008-12-09 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi again, We're moving from EXA to UXA, which fixes a lot of the performance problem by having an allocator that doesn't suck. The remainder of the fix would be accelerating trapezoids. Any plans to merge UXA and EXA? Having all the code duplicated doesn't seem a very wise idea. - Clemens

Re: Slow exaOffscreenAlloc ?

2008-12-08 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
2008/12/9 Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 12:32 +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Hi Recently I've noticed that scrolling in firefox is getting very very slow on some pages - especially those with some static background on the sides of pages. So I've started oprofile - and to