On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 16:05 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > So anyway, I'm running ecomorph ( compiz port for E17 ), and most of the
> > effects are very slow and jumpy.
> >
>
> Try
>
> Option "AccelDFS" "true"
>
> Dave.
Woah. OK that made things a lot better. It's still not perfect ( as per
my
On Thursday 26 March 2009 06:05:32 Dave Airlie wrote:
> Option "AccelDFS" "true"
Just out of curiosity, why is this needed? I thought compositing was mostly
just
texturing onto the root window back buffer and could mostly be done in h/w?
--
Bill, also wondering why compositing seems to be slo
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 20:29 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 16:05 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>
> >> Try
> >>
> >> Option "AccelDFS" "true"
> >
> > Any reason this kind of option isn't the default ? It seems
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 16:05 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> Try
>>
>> Option "AccelDFS" "true"
>
> Any reason this kind of option isn't the default ? It seems xorg.conf is
> mandatory for radeons just for the "don't suck" "true" optio
> I did a quick sysprof test while switching desktops, and it looks like
> it's all in memcpy:
>
> miClearToBackground 0.00 77.45
> miPaintWindow 0.00 77.45
> ValidateGC
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 16:05 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Try
>
> Option "AccelDFS" "true"
Any reason this kind of option isn't the default ? It seems xorg.conf is
mandatory for radeons just for the "don't suck" "true" options.
Xav
___
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 16:15 +1100, Daniel Kasak wrote:
>
> So anyway, I'm running ecomorph ( compiz port for E17 ), and most of the
> effects are very slow and jumpy.
>
> I did a quick sysprof test while switching desktops, and it looks like
> it's all in memcpy:
>
> miClearToBackground
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Kasak
wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I've brought an old r200 card out of retirement to bring some bling to
> my work desktop. I was running xserver-1.5.something with an integrated
> nvidia card. I did an upgrade to xserver-1.6, mesa-7.4-rc1 and
> xf86-video-radeon-6
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 01:36 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On 3/26/09, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I've brought an old r200 card out of retirement to bring some bling to
> > my work desktop. I was running xserver-1.5.something with an integrated
> > nvidia card. I did an upgrade to xs
On 3/26/09, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I've brought an old r200 card out of retirement to bring some bling to
> my work desktop. I was running xserver-1.5.something with an integrated
> nvidia card. I did an upgrade to xserver-1.6, mesa-7.4-rc1 and
> xf86-video-radeon-6.12.0.
>
> I don
Hi all.
I've brought an old r200 card out of retirement to bring some bling to
my work desktop. I was running xserver-1.5.something with an integrated
nvidia card. I did an upgrade to xserver-1.6, mesa-7.4-rc1 and
xf86-video-radeon-6.12.0.
I don't have any figures for previous software on this ha
11 matches
Mail list logo
