In libX11-6.2.1:
The configure piece below is wrong, (or pkg-config is buggy) because
pkg-config --cflags xproto
prints a line-feed only and keysymdef.h exists in my system and it is in
the right place.
I'm using pkg-config --version 0.23
#
# Find keysymdef.h
#
KEYSYMDEF=
for flag in
2009/2/19 milnser43...@yahoo.com milnser43...@yahoo.com:
There are very serious and severe memory leaks under X.org with the savage
driver. I am on FreeBSD. This is a very serious problem as it consumes all
system memory adn causes other applications to crash. It is totally unuseable
and
Pedro Izecksohn wrote:
pkg-config --cflags xproto
prints a line-feed only and keysymdef.h exists in my system and it is in
the right place.
Same here, on my local system (gentoo + X11 overlay). In my git tree it
gives a good-looking -I arg.
Though I never had problems building anything.
2009/2/19 Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com:
2009/2/19 milnser43...@yahoo.com milnser43...@yahoo.com:
There are very serious and severe memory leaks under X.org with the savage
driver. I am on FreeBSD. This is a very serious problem as it consumes all
system memory adn causes other
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:18:39 +
John Tapsell johnf...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/19 Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com:
2009/2/19 milnser43...@yahoo.com milnser43...@yahoo.com:
There are very serious and severe memory leaks under X.org with the savage
driver. I am on FreeBSD. This is a
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:22:21 -0800 (PST)
milnser43...@yahoo.com milnser43...@yahoo.com wrote:
There are very serious and severe memory leaks under X.org with the savage
driver
You forgot to attach the fixes
At the same time important backwards compatability upon which many of our
On Feb 18, 09 14:40:34 +, John Tapsell wrote:
So it is a validation tool, but not a benchmark.
A benchmark - by definition - gives you performance figures that can be
compared with other systems, which gives you a reasonable notion of
which of the systems is better.
Right. If one
On Feb 18, 09 12:58:49 -0500, Jim Gettys wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:49 -0700, McDonald, Michael-p7438c wrote:
Dumb question: Do LCD/Plasma/OLED/... Actually have vertical retrace?
Does the vblank interval approach 0?
LCD: yes
Plasma: yes
OLED: ? (still mostly
Simon Thum wrote:
Pedro Izecksohn wrote:
pkg-config --cflags xproto
prints a line-feed only and keysymdef.h exists in my system and it is in
the right place.
Same here, on my local system (gentoo + X11 overlay). In my git tree it
gives a good-looking -I arg.
Sorry for the noise. I haven't
Thank you all for your comments!
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:22 PM, tac jeuse@gmail.com wrote:
ps. I was running into this when I type make install from the source:
Making install in libdrm
make: Fatal error in
On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:09:30 Simon Thum wrote:
Sorry for the noise. I haven't found the issue, but a majority of .pc's
in my system doesn't output cflags. So it's something configuration- or
pkc-config related.
In theory a lot of them shouldn't need to, because they're installed in a
Bill Crawford wrote:
In theory a lot of them shouldn't need to, because they're installed in a
subdirectory of /usr/include, and you're intended to include
libfoo/blah.h ...
I guessed that also, but couldn' get it nailed down. Anyway, it looks
more like the OP's script is broken.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, John Tapsell wrote:
2009/2/19 Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com:
2009/2/19 milnser43...@yahoo.com milnser43...@yahoo.com:
There are very serious and severe memory leaks under X.org with the
savage driver. I am on FreeBSD. This is a very serious problem as it
consumes
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 13:03 +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:
On Feb 18, 09 12:58:49 -0500, Jim Gettys wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:49 -0700, McDonald, Michael-p7438c wrote:
Dumb question: Do LCD/Plasma/OLED/... Actually have vertical retrace?
Does the vblank interval approach 0?
LCD:
Twas brillig at 09:44:35 19.02.2009 UTC-05 when j...@freedesktop.org did gyre
and gimble:
JG So if memory is right by the pixels the concept of vertical retrace
JG may become moot, conceivably, someday.
It is already, for e-ink displays.
--
pgplvbV1kRRYF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- On Thu, 2/19/09, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
From: Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: Severe memory leaks make X.org unuseable
To: milnser43...@yahoo.com
Cc: xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 5:47 AM
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:22:21
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 20:46 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 09:44:35 19.02.2009 UTC-05 when j...@freedesktop.org did gyre
and gimble:
JG So if memory is right by the pixels the concept of vertical retrace
JG may become moot, conceivably, someday.
It is already, for e-ink
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Dan danstowell+x...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi -
One of the warnings in xorg-macros.m4.in is wrong, it prints out the
wrong version when it says requires version x.x. Patch pasted below
against http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/util/macros/tree/xorg-macros.m4.in
-
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 06:50 -0800, milnser43...@yahoo.com wrote:
The number of apps which PEX, MIT_SUNDRY, and Ximage is probably a rather
small number but certainly there have been apps written to use it. As for
Xfree86-misc, I have heard that some modern screensavers use it to provide
Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:22:21 -0800 (PST)
At the same time important backwards compatability upon which many of our
applications depend, have been removed including PEX, Ximage, MIT-SUNDRY,
XFree86-Misc,
You forgot to volunteer to maintain them - not that I find you
--- On Thu, 2/19/09, Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org wrote:
From: Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Severe memory leaks make X.org unuseable
To: milnser43...@yahoo.com
Cc: xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 9:58 AM
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 06:50 -0800,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 06:50:38AM -0800, milnser43...@yahoo.com wrote:
I dont think that backwards compatability code should be removed just
because we dont dont think anyone uses it anymore, or because we can. As
far as I am aware these extensions were not causing any problems and I cannot
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 09:18 +, John Tapsell wrote:
2009/2/19 Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com:
2009/2/19 milnser43...@yahoo.com milnser43...@yahoo.com:
There are very serious and severe memory leaks under X.org with the savage
driver. I am on FreeBSD. This is a very serious problem
Am I allowed to change the value of the XImage byte_order field? And if
I do, will subsequent XPutImage() calls do the right thing? Does the
value of byte_order default to the client's byte order?
I have a memory based frame buffer from another app that I'd like to
use XCreateImage() and
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 06:18 -0800, milnser43...@yahoo.com wrote:
Earlier on freebsd 7.0 pmap back in Nov. was not available and would
not compile right. But now it seems to have compiled on 7.1 and is
working ok. It reports memory allocations but does not report line
numbers. I am going to
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Pedro Izecksohn
pedro.izecks...@gmail.com wrote:
In libX11-6.2.1:
The configure piece below is wrong, (or pkg-config is buggy) because
pkg-config --cflags xproto
prints a line-feed only and keysymdef.h exists in my system and it is in
the right place.
A few day ago I posted this problem. I am totally stuck and cannot get the
xserver working. Can anyone help me on this issue or at least point me to a
resource that will be of assistance.
Sincerely,
Dave
- Original Message
From: Dave diaco...@yahoo.com
To:
Who will fix it up there? Who has git write permission?
How none saw this before me? The original developers did not try configure?
This bugs affects thousands advanced users.
On 2/19/09, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Pedro Izecksohn
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Pedro Izecksohn
pedro.izecks...@gmail.com wrote:
Who will fix it up there? Who has git write permission?
How none saw this before me? The original developers did not try configure?
Oh, I just looked in git and it's already been fixed for a while. It
should
It came from http://xlibs.freedesktop.org/release/
BTW: What is the logic behind xlibs version numbers?
On 2/19/09, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Pedro Izecksohn
pedro.izecks...@gmail.com wrote:
Who will fix it up there? Who has git write
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Pedro Izecksohn
pedro.izecks...@gmail.com wrote:
It came from http://xlibs.freedesktop.org/release/
BTW: What is the logic behind xlibs version numbers?
Right, the old xlibs releases. You want the newer xorg releases. You
can find them all here:
Maybe try the http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx list?
Maarten.
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
I've been trying to run the latest xorg components on an i845 for a while now,
and I haven't found a good set of component versions + configurations that works
well. Here's info on the most recent release + current git versions of stuff. If
there's anywhere else I should put this (e.g. individual
Pedro Izecksohn wrote:
It came from http://xlibs.freedesktop.org/release/
BTW: What is the logic behind xlibs version numbers?
xlibs hasn't been used in many years - it was a brief experiment,
long ago abandoned.The libraries that are currently maintained
and relased are at:
Hello,
I am a coreboot (http://www.coreboot.org) developer working mostly Intel
chipsets. Currently I am working an set-top-box with an Intel chipset. I am
looking into implementing LVDS and TV-OUT support for various Intel GMCH's
for set-top-boxes and possibly laptops starting right from the
milnser43...@yahoo.com wrote:
At the same time important backwards compatability upon which many of our
applications depend, have been removed including PEX, Ximage, MIT-SUNDRY,
XFree86-Misc, among others creating a massive incompatability headache. A
prime principle of the X.org project
The resource usage has not changed much after it has been running. Though you
are right, I think you are saying that the two 131 mb allocations are not
actually real ram usage, but instead are just mappings of the video hardware
address space. So basically that is not space consumed in RAM.
2009/2/18 Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:41:31AM +0800, sheldon wrote:
I'm trying to find how Xorg handles ACPI (s3 and s4). It seems that
Xorg
handles S3/S4( suspend and resume) is just the same as it process VT
switching, for both the flow is
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:34:38AM +0800, Sheldon Zhao wrote:
So, vbetool saves and restores the video card state, and the Xorg don't
even know a S3/S4 happen?
Either vbetool or the kernel graphics drivers. X only sees a VT switch.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
It seems xcb/x11 have some bugs related to sizeof(long), in concrete
using 32 bit variables for dpy-request et al in AMD64.
This patch fixes some crashes for me.
diff -ur libx11-1.1.99.2/src/xcb_io.c libx11-1.1.99.2-a/src/xcb_io.c
--- libx11-1.1.99.2/src/xcb_io.c2008-11-04
On 2009.02.20 07:43:21 +0800, Joseph Smith wrote:
Hello,
I am a coreboot (http://www.coreboot.org) developer working mostly Intel
chipsets. Currently I am working an set-top-box with an Intel chipset. I am
looking into implementing LVDS and TV-OUT support for various Intel GMCH's
for
dolphinling wrote:
All the Xorg.0.logs from this are available at
http://dolphinling.net/xorglogs/
Oops, I meant to put my xorg.confs and kernel .configs there too. They're there
now.
--
dolphinling
http://dolphinling.net/
___
xorg mailing list
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:19:49 +0800, Zhenyu Wang zhenyu.z.w...@intel.com
wrote:
On 2009.02.20 07:43:21 +0800, Joseph Smith wrote:
Hello,
I am a coreboot (http://www.coreboot.org) developer working mostly Intel
chipsets. Currently I am working an set-top-box with an Intel chipset. I
am
Given that last years changes to xineramaproto appear to impact a number of
applications (on my system anyway), could anyone tell me when the next
release of xineramaproto will occur?
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:11:37 -0500, Joseph Smith j...@settoplinux.org
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:19:49 +0800, Zhenyu Wang zhenyu.z.w...@intel.com
wrote:
On 2009.02.20 07:43:21 +0800, Joseph Smith wrote:
Hello,
I am a coreboot (http://www.coreboot.org) developer working mostly
Hi,
Need help with the following problem: Desktop is not using full available
screen space.
The system was working fine in Debian Etch. Then it was upgraded to Debian
Lenny. Hardware remains the same, no changes were made.
After the upgrade to Lenny, the picture doesn't use the whole
46 matches
Mail list logo
