Hi,
On 15 May 2018 at 06:43, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 05/14/18 12:58 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
>> Adam Jackson writes:
>>> tl;dr: I will not be release manager for 1.21, nor for anything
>>> thereafter either, and this time that's probably permanent.
>>
>> I'd like to thank you for all of the
On 2018-05-14 09:50 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> tl;dr: I will not be release manager for 1.21, nor for anything
> thereafter either, and this time that's probably permanent.
>
> I won't make this too long to read though, it's not complicated. In a
> technical sense, I don't feel that I've been an ef
On 2018-05-15 07:43 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 05/14/18 12:58 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
>> Adam Jackson writes:
>>
>>> As for what this means for tree management and future release plans,
>>> well, I can't answer that, that's sort of the point. There's a
>>> community discussion that needs to
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 02:23:48PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 07:48 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:40:18PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > > > xf86-video-intel-2.99.917:
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 12:51 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Those specific fixes could probably be cherry-picked to the version
> > you're trying to build, but it may be worthwhile to update to git
> > master anyway.
>
> I'm packaging for NetBSD, and we prefer to package tarballs, not git
> mas
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 10:13 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> We've been facing the same question in Wayland. Here's what I wrote up
> about what I think we should do with that:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2018-May/038100.html
>
> Personally I think having longer discussio
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 12:34 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2018-05-14 09:50 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > tl;dr: I will not be release manager for 1.21, nor for anything
> > thereafter either, and this time that's probably permanent.
> >
> > I won't make this too long to read though, it's not comp
Alan Coopersmith writes:
> While in person discussions can be efficient, I do wonder if limiting
> them to people who can travel to XDC is how we end up burning out the
> same folks over and over.
A good point. With corporate support for desktop computing seeming
fairly limited, I suspect we're
Hi,
I upgraded Xwayland and the assorted libraries from git masters today,
and noticed that glamor wouldn't work anymore on i.MX6/etnaviv. The
error was:
No provider of glVertexAttribDivisor found. Requires one of:
Desktop OpenGL 3.3
OpenGL ES 3.0
GL extension "GL_ANGLE_instanced_arr
On 16 May 2018 at 05:51, Lukas F. Hartmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded Xwayland and the assorted libraries from git masters today,
> and noticed that glamor wouldn't work anymore on i.MX6/etnaviv. The
> error was:
>
> No provider of glVertexAttribDivisor found. Requires one of:
> Desktop Open
10 matches
Mail list logo
