Hi,
(please CC me, as I am not subscribed)
with GCC 4.8, few "implicit declaration of function" warnings become
errors, breaking the build of xserver on the Hurd.
Attached there are two patches, which apply fine in both master and
server-1.14-branch branches, which fix the errors providing the
Hello,
Pino Toscano, le Wed 28 Aug 2013 17:36:26 +0200, a écrit :
> with GCC 4.8, few "implicit declaration of function" warnings become
> errors, breaking the build of xserver on the Hurd.
>
> Attached there are two patches, which apply fine in both master and
> server-1.14-branch branches, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris,
I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't
want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another.
thanks,
Matt
On 09/17/2013 12:02 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Pino Toscano, le Wed 28 Aug 2013 17:36:2
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> Chris,
> I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't
> want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another.
>
Err, what are you talking about?
Cheers,
Julien
___
Hi Matt,
On 09/18/13 05:50, Matt Dew wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris,
I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't
want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another.
From the names of the directory that contains the files affected b
On 09/18/13 13:29, Chris Clayton wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 09/18/13 05:50, Matt Dew wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris,
I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't
want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another.
From the names of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Chris.
On 09/19/2013 01:18 AM, Chris Clayton wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/13 13:29, Chris Clayton wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> On 09/18/13 05:50, Matt Dew wrote:
> Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that?
> I don't want a nas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/18/2013 02:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>
>> Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify
>> that? I don't want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks
>> another.
>>
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 21:43:02 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> On 09/18/2013 02:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> >
> >> Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify
> >> that? I don't want a nasty loop where fixing one things b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/20/2013 12:45 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 21:43:02 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>
>> On 09/18/2013 02:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>>>
Chris, I'm guessing this w
10 matches
Mail list logo