[PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-08-28 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, (please CC me, as I am not subscribed) with GCC 4.8, few "implicit declaration of function" warnings become errors, breaking the build of xserver on the Hurd. Attached there are two patches, which apply fine in both master and server-1.14-branch branches, which fix the errors providing the

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Pino Toscano, le Wed 28 Aug 2013 17:36:26 +0200, a écrit : > with GCC 4.8, few "implicit declaration of function" warnings become > errors, breaking the build of xserver on the Hurd. > > Attached there are two patches, which apply fine in both master and > server-1.14-branch branches, wh

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-17 Thread Matt Dew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another. thanks, Matt On 09/17/2013 12:02 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Pino Toscano, le Wed 28 Aug 2013 17:36:2

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > Chris, > I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't > want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another. > Err, what are you talking about? Cheers, Julien ___

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-18 Thread Chris Clayton
Hi Matt, On 09/18/13 05:50, Matt Dew wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another. From the names of the directory that contains the files affected b

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-19 Thread Chris Clayton
On 09/18/13 13:29, Chris Clayton wrote: Hi Matt, On 09/18/13 05:50, Matt Dew wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another. From the names of the

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-20 Thread Matt Dew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks Chris. On 09/19/2013 01:18 AM, Chris Clayton wrote: > > > On 09/18/13 13:29, Chris Clayton wrote: >> Hi Matt, >> >> On 09/18/13 05:50, Matt Dew wrote: > Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? > I don't want a nas

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-20 Thread Matt Dew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/18/2013 02:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > >> Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify >> that? I don't want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks >> another. >>

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 21:43:02 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > On 09/18/2013 02:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > > > >> Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify > >> that? I don't want a nasty loop where fixing one things b

Re: [PATCHES] fix build on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.8

2013-09-20 Thread Matt Dew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/20/2013 12:45 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 21:43:02 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > >> On 09/18/2013 02:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: >>> Chris, I'm guessing this w