On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:52:52AM -0400, Mouse wrote:
> [PATCH xauth] Look for FamilyLocal if inet or inet6 address is loopback
> >> If the address came from resolving a name, as in "xhost +localhost",
> >> then I like this. But if the address was specified directly, as in
> >> "xhost +::1",
[PATCH xauth] Look for FamilyLocal if inet or inet6 address is loopback
>> If the address came from resolving a name, as in "xhost +localhost",
>> then I like this. But if the address was specified directly, as in
>> "xhost +::1", then I'd go so far as to say that adding FamilyLocal,
>> or, w
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:26:21PM -0400, Mouse wrote:
> >> [PATCH xauth] Look for FamilyLocal if inet or inet6 address is loopback
>
> Based solely on this description, I'd say this is a "maybe".
>
> If the address came from resolving a name, as in "xhost +localhost",
> then I like this. But if
Hi Egbert,
I developed a patch for xauth to fix some nasty problems. I first asked
Alan to apply the patch but he had not enough time to do it. So after
some time he gave me access to Xorg as a commiter (I certainly did not
do this on my own).
So my plan was to look after xauth, which I stil
>> [PATCH xauth] Look for FamilyLocal if inet or inet6 address is loopback
Based solely on this description, I'd say this is a "maybe".
If the address came from resolving a name, as in "xhost +localhost",
then I like this. But if the address was specified directly, as in
"xhost +::1", then I'd g
Egbert,
thanks a lot! I will try to look at them during the weekend.
Kind regards,
Tilmann
On 09/18/2013 11:32 PM, Egbert Eich wrote:
Hi Tilman,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:28:14PM +0200, Dr. Tilmann Bubeck wrote:
Hi Egbert,
I developed a patch for xauth to fix some nasty problems. I first
Hi Tilman,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:28:14PM +0200, Dr. Tilmann Bubeck wrote:
> Hi Egbert,
>
> I developed a patch for xauth to fix some nasty problems. I first asked Alan
> to apply the patch but he had not enough time to do it. So after some time
> he gave me access to Xorg as a commiter (I c
When there were complaints last year that no one was integrating xauth patches
since there was no maintainer, he volunteered to maintain it, so I let him try.
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-October/034079.html
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-December/034803.html
(Yes, we
Hi!
On August 14 I've reposted three patches for xauth to this mailing list.
I did so, because I had discovered that a 'Dr. Tilmann Bubeck' has added
himself as maintainer of the xauth package to the xorg/doc/xorg-docs/MAINTAINERS
file on Jan. 22 2013 - considering the change frequency of this fi
Running past the end of the chain would cause a SEGV.
Signed-off-by: Egbert Eich
---
process.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/process.c b/process.c
index 166b769..a9466a7 100644
--- a/process.c
+++ b/process.c
@@ -1280,8 +1280,11 @@ remove_entry(const
10 matches
Mail list logo