Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-13 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
This is confusing to me. Why do you add the extra " ; echo '** mkfontdir'"? On Sep 12, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: > If cross-compiling, we can run the build host mkfontdir on the font directory, > since the output is arch independent (I think) > > If cross-compiling and we can't find

Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-15 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 14/09/2011 00:09, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: This is confusing to me. Why do you add the extra " ; echo '** mkfontdir'"? On Sep 12, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: +AC_DEFUN([XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR],[ + if test x"$cross_compiling" != x"no" ; then + AC_PATH_PROG(MKFONTDI

Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-15 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 14/09/2011 00:09, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: >> This is confusing to me. Why do you add the extra " ; echo '** mkfontdir'"? > >> On Sep 12, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: >>> +AC_DEFUN([XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR],[ >>> + if test x"$cross_compi

Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-15 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote: +# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR() +# --- +# Minimum version: 1.1.1 Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released 1.2.0? -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window Syste

Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-16 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 16/09/2011 05:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote: +# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR() +# --- +# Minimum version: 1.1.1 Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released 1.2.0? Good catch, thank you. I think I'd prefer to write 1.2.1, as the next version

Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-16 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 09/16/11 06:04, Jon TURNEY wrote: On 16/09/2011 05:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote: +# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR() +# --- +# Minimum version: 1.1.1 Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released 1.2.0? Good catch, thank you. I think I'd prefe

Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-20 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 17/09/2011 02:11, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/16/11 06:04, Jon TURNEY wrote: On 16/09/2011 05:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote: +# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR() +# --- +# Minimum version: 1.1.1 Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released 1.2.

Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-20 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 17/09/2011 02:11, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/16/11 06:04, Jon TURNEY wrote: On 16/09/2011 05:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote: +# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR() +# --- +# Minimum version: 1.1.1 Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released 1.2.

Re: [PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

2011-09-22 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 09/20/11 06:00, Jon TURNEY wrote: On 17/09/2011 02:11, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/16/11 06:04, Jon TURNEY wrote: On 16/09/2011 05:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote: +# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR() +# --- +# Minimum version: 1.1.1 Shouldn't that b