http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12869
David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 20:48 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>
> Disabling colortiling makes it work.
> Do I need to test something else ?
Can you try the new version in experimental,
1:6.7.198~git20080117.6bd510a2-1? That should now accelerate the
rotation.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer |
On Jan 17, 2008 12:05 PM, George - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:48:39 -0500
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: split mach64 out ?
> > CC: xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org
>
> >
> > Looks good to me, but I'll let the distro packagers chime
>
> you may want to try git HEAD directly (for ubuntu):
>
> sudo apt-get install git-core
> sudo apt-get build-dep xserver-xorg-video-ati
>
> git-clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati
> cd xf86-video-ati
> git-checkout -b test master
> patch -p1 < mach64-cursor.patch
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:35:44 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: split mach64 out ?
> CC: xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org
>
> On Jan 17, 2008 12:05 PM, George - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure, if everything goes well with mach64, r128 should be easy.
> >
>
On ven, 2008-01-18 at 12:28 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 20:48 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> >
> > Disabling colortiling makes it work.
> > Do I need to test something else ?
>
> Can you try the new version in experimental,
> 1:6.7.198~git20080117.6bd510a2-1? That should n
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128
Summary: Unable to use xrandr to go dual-head
Product: xorg
Version: 7.3
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12880
--- Comment #9 from Tormod Volden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-18 14:47:50 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=13781)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=13781)
get-edid through parse-edid output
Whereas ddcprobe sees the physic
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12880
--- Comment #10 from Tormod Volden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-18 14:51:27 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=13782)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=13782)
updated Xorg.0.log (minimal xorg.conf, xorg-server 1.4.1~git2008010
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12869
--- Comment #11 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-18 06:55:10 PST
---
type xrandr to see the names of the outputs. On radeon the VGA and DVI ports
will be DVI-0 or DVI-1 and VGA-0 and VGA-1 depending on the number and type of
por
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12880
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-18 12:33:36 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If it's available in the EDID, we use it, but not all laptop panels provide an
> EDID.
Should I file a separate bug then, because the E
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12880
--- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-18 10:53:31 PST
---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but why is it necessary to extract the physical
> size from the bios tables when it is being correct
On jeu, 2008-01-17 at 15:47 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008 2:48 PM, Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On jeu, 2008-01-17 at 13:00 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Jan 17, 2008 12:52 PM, Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On jeu, 200
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12880
Kevin Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
