port.
> The reason what I feel for X-Server coming up is cuz
> the default version of
> X-Server will still exist unless you choose the
> specific OS image and the
> X-Server with FB support.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anurag Palsule
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
I configured my X server to use the frame buffer
devices. Now how do I make sure that the X server that
is running on my system is actually the framebuffer X
server, and is using the fb device that I have
specified in the FRAMEBUFFER environment variable.
Also when I remove the frame buffer device
Any idea how to implement such kind of approach.
Anurag
--- Ricardo Baratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that'd definitely depend on your code. afaik
> (conceptually) there's nothing
> there that's specific to any kind of machine.
>
> ricardo
>
> At s
But will such an approach won't be portable across
different platforms, hardware and flavours of linux ??
- Anurag
--- Ricardo Baratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hooking onto the Xserver might affect the
> performance,
> > Can I go one level below the x server, sit
> somewhere
> > in between
uests*, since the X responses would have to pass
> back through your
> proxy on their way to the client.
>
> Could the Record extension somehow be used to do
> this?
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 01:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
> Anurag Palsule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hello,
Is it possible for me to write a wrapper or a hook to
the Xserver,so that all the X calls, instead of going
to Xserver, will land into my application and my
application will inturn pass them to the X server for
further processing.
If yes, how ?
thanks,
Anurag
__
