Re: [Xpert]can X11 die more slowly ?

2002-03-05 Thread Gniazdowski Mariusz
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 17:04:34 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Gettys) wrote: It is *always* a bug if your X server crashes. Consider X like the operating system. Please try to get some data on where the server is crashing, and what kind of system and display you are using.

[Xpert]can X11 die more slowly ?

2002-03-04 Thread Gniazdowski Mariusz
Hi. Sometimes it happens - work in some vi, staroffice, gimp etc etc and bum - Signal 11 server crash... With Mandrak8.1 it happens very rarely, however it happens. So, are there chances to make it look like Hey XFree did receive signal X11, save your work and prepare to shut down ? -- Regards

Re: [Xpert]can X11 die more slowly ?

2002-03-04 Thread Christer Palm
Gniazdowski Mariusz wrote: Sometimes it happens - work in some vi, staroffice, gimp etc etc and bum - Signal 11 server crash... With Mandrak8.1 it happens very rarely, however it happens. So, are there chances to make it look like Hey XFree did receive signal X11, save your work and

Re: [Xpert]can X11 die more slowly ?

2002-03-04 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Gniazdowski Mariusz wrote: Hi. Sometimes it happens - work in some vi, staroffice, gimp etc etc and bum - Signal 11 server crash... With Mandrak8.1 it happens very rarely, however it happens. So, are there chances to make it look like Hey XFree did receive signal

Re: [Xpert]can X11 die more slowly ?

2002-03-04 Thread Jim Gettys
Luckily there is actually a protocol in the ICCCM for the window manager to the send the application a polite request to shutdown, and this is what the 'X' typically does, though many window managers will also have an option for more forceful xkill style termination. (After all, the app