Re: Documentation help

Hi Evan, my name is Torsten and I am from Germany. I have enlistet myself in the Xubuntu mailinglist before round about two weeks. My motivation was and is to learn more about the development of Xubuntu/XFCE and to bring in new ideas and concepts for the Xubuntu-roadmap. I'm looking forward to m

Documentation help

Hi, My name is Evan Egenolf and I am petroleum engineer in Wyoming. I use Xubuntu as my daily driver, and would like to help contribute in whatever way I can (both donation of time and contributions). The first step I was told was to introduce myself on the mailing list! Hope to hear from you al

Re: Update link: The official Xubuntu documentation translations

Hi Dani, Thanks for spotting it. It's fixed now. Regards, Yousuf On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:58 PM Dani wrote: > Hello: > > > Here: > https://xubuntu.org/contribute/documentation/ > > I think the "The official Xubuntu documentation translations" link > sh

Update link: The official Xubuntu documentation translations

Hello: Here: https://xubuntu.org/contribute/documentation/ I think the "The official Xubuntu documentation translations" link should be updated. Now go to: https://translations.launchpad.net/xubuntu-docs If I'm not mistaken, the new address is: https://www.transifex.com/

Re: documentation contribnution

aul, > > This seems like a nice tip that could be added to the website as a > blog post, similar to others we have with the FAQ tag. If the team > agrees, then it could be posted on the website. > https://xubuntu.org/news/tag/faq/ > > With relation to the documentation, I'

Re: documentation contribnution

Hi Paul, This seems like a nice tip that could be added to the website as a blog post, similar to others we have with the FAQ tag. If the team agrees, then it could be posted on the website. https://xubuntu.org/news/tag/faq/ With relation to the documentation, I'm not sure yet how exte

documentation contribnution

Hi All I have a blog post scheduled for the weekend that covers how to add emblems to files. As this is applicable to XFCE it may be useful to Xubuntu too. https://personaljournal.ca/paulsutton/adding-emblems-to-files It should just show up as 'scheduled' due to the way Writefeeely works If t

Re: As to 20.04 documentation

Hi Stephen, Your patch was already added into the main google doc I created for documentation tasks, so that it could be discussed during the docs meeting that is planned for this Saturday at 3pm UTC. Though not installed by default, apt-offline is still in the repo, which means that it still can

As to 20.04 documentation

Hello! Yes, I posted a bug with patch to scour *all* references to apt-offline across all the chapters of xubuntu-docs. Before setting up a duplicative set of Google Docs for use in editing before glomming everything back into DocBook, review of the patch would be appreciated. The short of i

Re: Documentation meeting

Thanks for responding and look forward to it. @For All: I've created this google doc, for thoughts on things that should be added or changed in documentation. Please contribute to it if you have ideas or have noticed things lacking in docs. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oGNc4nDmU

Re: Documentation meeting

Anytime this weekend should work for me. I'm in EDT (GMT-4), for what it's worth. As for reaching out to David, he hasn't been around for a little while. That last time I spoke with him was in May of last year. In his absence, I'll work as a stand-in for documentation.

Re: Documentation meeting

n, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:38 PM Yousuf Philips wrote: > Hi Team, > > I would like to organize an audio/video meeting to discuss contributing to > documentation within the next one or two weeks and try to set out a plan of > the order of things to tackle with it. If anyone wishes to join,

Documentation meeting

Hi Team, I would like to organize an audio/video meeting to discuss contributing to documentation within the next one or two weeks and try to set out a plan of the order of things to tackle with it. If anyone wishes to join, please let me know what the best time for you would be so we can

Re: English version of Ubuntu documentation

d pdf documentation is searchable, both in a Xubuntu environment using Atril for the effect as in a Windows enviroment, using Acrobat Reader in this case. You say that that your made searchable pdf is 22 MB, 1/3 of its original size, whitch is odd since the original pdf documentation (downloaded from

Documentation sprint call

Greetings all. The Xubuntu Documentation Team will be hosting a Documentation sprint next Tuesday, 6th March at 22UTC [1] at #xubuntu-devel on Freenode. Couple of items on our ToDo list: - update the end-user documentation - update the installer slideshow - review the documentation for

Re: Removing the contributor documentation from the default build targets

On 03/18/2016 07:24 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: Hello documentation zealots, here's a brief summary of a discussion [1] on the IRC channel today: - The user and contributor documentation are tracked on the same branch because they have many common assets - The user and contri

Re: Removing the contributor documentation from the default build targets

Since just the user-docs are release-specific, not the contributor-docs, I don't see no reason to go ahead and implement it. Cheers, slickymaster On 18 March 2016 at 23:24, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > Hello documentation zealots, > > here's a brief summary of a discussion [1]

Re: Removing the contributor documentation from the default build targets

This proposal sounds reasonable. We can maintain the two in the same branch while only building the user docs in the package. On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: Hello documentation zealots, here's a brief summary of a discussion [1] on the IRC channel today: - The

Documentation Review for Google Code-In Task

GCI-Ubuntu Task: Help improve the Xubuntu Contributor documentation (Ubuntu) By: Mark Angelo Tero Mentor: Pasi Lallinaho A copy of this Document is sent to the following address: xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com What can I do to help Xubuntu Team? - I would like to help in the campaigning and

QA testing documentation

Along with many of the other 'team' documents, the testing and QA pages have moved from the website [1] . *This page is now deprecated.* We are moving all across to http://docs.xubuntu.org/contributors The QA pages now live there, any changes to how we work will take place there, currently we

Dead link on Launchpad Xubuntu Documentation team page

Hello! On the Launchpad Xubuntu Documentation team page [1], the link to get involved [2] is dead. This link below appears to be correct [3]. [1] https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-doc [2] http://xubuntu.org/contribute/support_documentation/ [3] http://xubuntu.org/contribute/documentation

Re: PDF exports of the documentation

>>> Hello, > >>> > >>> inspired and motivated by a G+ thread [1] brought to my > >>> attention, I decided to look again at producing PDF's out of > >>> the documentation. > >>> > >>> As a consequence, the Wily d

Re: PDF exports of the documentation

2 Jul 2015 03:09:56 +0300 Pasi Lallinaho >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> inspired and motivated by a G+ thread [1] brought to my >>> attention, I decided to look again at producing PDF's out of >>> the documentation. >>

Re: PDF exports of the documentation

On 22/07/15 17:10, Simon Steinbeiß wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:09:56 +0300 > Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> inspired and motivated by a G+ thread [1] brought to my attention, I >> decided to look again at producing PDF's out of the documenta

Re: PDF exports of the documentation

On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:09:56 +0300 Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > Hello, > > inspired and motivated by a G+ thread [1] brought to my attention, I > decided to look again at producing PDF's out of the documentation. > > As a consequence, the Wily documentation branch [2] is

PDF exports of the documentation

Hello, inspired and motivated by a G+ thread [1] brought to my attention, I decided to look again at producing PDF's out of the documentation. As a consequence, the Wily documentation branch [2] is now able to build PDF documentation files for the documentation - and all of its transla

Call for translators - Translating the Xubuntu end-user documentation

As we progressively approach the end phase of the Vivid cycle [1] we need an extra effort of help from our community in translation the Xubuntu end-user documentation in order to provide the opportunity of a enjoyable Xubuntu experience to a wider specter range in their native language

Re: For the website team - Documentation Site

On 16/12/14 04:36, James Vorderbruggen wrote: > Hello XUbuntu website team, > > I'm a member of the Ubuntu GNOME documentation team, and we're looking > to create a dedicated documentation site similar to yours > at http://docs.xubuntu.org/ I was wondering if you could

For the website team - Documentation Site

Hello XUbuntu website team, I'm a member of the Ubuntu GNOME documentation team, and we're looking to create a dedicated documentation site similar to yours at http://docs.xubuntu.org/ I was wondering if you could share some information about how you built this and maintain it. Namely

Call for translators - Translating the Xubuntu end-user documentation

With the upcoming Doc Freeze [1] upon us, we are now entering the last stretch of the Utopic cycle and it's important for everyone to be able to enjoy the Xubuntu experience in their native language, so we need to increase the number of translated end-user documentation. If you

Re: How to contribute to documentation after 14.04 release

On 30 April 2014 03:49, wrote: > > From: Ted Cox > To: xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: How to contribute to documentation after 14.04 release? > Message-ID: > fjbgh9lcb...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" &g

Re: How to contribute to documentation after 14.04 release?

On 27/04/14 16:14, Ted Cox wrote: Now that 14.04 is released, what opportunities are available for helping out with documentation? I'd like to continue reviewing and editing the documentation but I'm not sure what's needed. Hi Ted, come along to #xubuntu-devel and talk

How to contribute to documentation after 14.04 release?

Now that 14.04 is released, what opportunities are available for helping out with documentation? I'd like to continue reviewing and editing the documentation but I'm not sure what's needed. -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/m

Re: Documentation

On 17/03/14 15:17, David Dodd wrote: I would like to help in documentation. How do I get involved in doing that? David I'd come by the -devel IRC channel and talk to us. #xubuntu-devel on freenode Elfy -- Ubuntu Forum Council Member Xubuntu QA Lead -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xu

Documentation

I would like to help in documentation. How do I get involved in doing that? David -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel

Re: Trying to build documentation - error:

he Ubuntu repositories? > > sudo apt-get install xsltproc > > Richard > > > > On 02/17/2014 08:11 PM, Jay Torian wrote: >> Hello Pasi, >> >> I installed some of the things I needed to run this but get err. below. >> Any idea how I can build this documenta

Prerequisite package needed: Trying to build documentation

gt;> Hello Pasi, >> >> I installed some of the things I needed to run this but get err. below. >> Any idea how I can build this documentation? Not sure where chunk.xsl >> is supposed to come from. >> There's things I'm still working on

Re: Trying to build documentation - error:

I needed to run this but get err. below. > Any idea how I can build this documentation? Not sure where chunk.xsl > is supposed to come from. > There's things I'm still working on for 13.10 but please let me know > if you have thoughts. Thank you. > > - Jay T. > >

Trying to build documentation - error:

Hello Pasi, I installed some of the things I needed to run this but get err. below. Any idea how I can build this documentation? Not sure where chunk.xsl is supposed to come from. There's things I'm still working on for 13.10 but please let me know if you have thoughts. Thank you

Re: It's time to get the documentation work started for 14.04!

Hi. On 14 January 2014 12:00, wrote: > > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:24:15 +0200 > From: Pasi Lallinaho > To: Xubuntu Developer > Subject: It's time to get the documentation work started for 14.04! > Message-ID: <52d4597f.1040...@shimmerproject.org> > Content-Ty

It's time to get the documentation work started for 14.04!

Hello Xubuntu enthusiasts! We sorted out the documentation blueprint [1] with the Xubuntu documentation lead Jack today. We need your help with some tasks: 1) Website updates If you are good in writing marketing-style text, we would love if you could help us with the Tour [2] page to highlight

Getting started with documentation (was: n00b here)

On 10/11/13 21:06, Ted Cox wrote: > Howdy. I'd like to contribute to the documentation team. I've used > X/Ubuntu exclusively for almost 6 years and come from a > writing/journalism background. Software documentation, however, is > very, very, very new to me. > >

Fw: [Bug 1207493] Re: [SRU] Documentation does not match shipped system version (11.10 shipped with 12.04)

] Documentation does not match shipped system version (11.10 shipped with 12.04) Hello Stephen, or anyone else affected, Accepted xubuntu-docs into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu- docs/12.04.0 in a few hours, and then in

Re: New Xubuntu Documentation lead: Jack Fromm

Congrats Jack. Dave > On 11 September 2013 at 22:08 Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > > > Hello Xubuntu developers and other mailing list followers, > > I'm very glad to announce that Jack Fromm (IRC: jjfrv8) is the new > Xubuntu Documentation lead! The change is effective imme

Re: New Xubuntu Documentation lead: Jack Fromm

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:08:49AM +0300, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > Hello Xubuntu developers and other mailing list followers, > > I'm very glad to announce that Jack Fromm (IRC: jjfrv8) is the new > Xubuntu Documentation lead! The change is effective immediately. Congratula

Re: New Xubuntu Documentation lead: Jack Fromm

On 11/09/13 22:08, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: Hello Xubuntu developers and other mailing list followers, I'm very glad to announce that Jack Fromm (IRC: jjfrv8) is the new Xubuntu Documentation lead! The change is effective immediately. Jack has been an immense and awesome asset for us wit

RE: New Xubuntu Documentation lead: Jack Fromm

Awesome news :D huzzah for Jack - Lderan > Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:39:28 +0200 > From: si...@xfce.org > To: xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: New Xubuntu Documentation lead: Jack Fromm > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:08:49 +0300 > Pasi Lallinaho wrote: &g

Re: New Xubuntu Documentation lead: Jack Fromm

On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:08:49 +0300 Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > I'm very glad to announce that Jack Fromm (IRC: jjfrv8) is the new > Xubuntu Documentation lead! The change is effective immediately. Congrats Jack – and thanks for your work! Cheers, Simon -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xu

New Xubuntu Documentation lead: Jack Fromm

Hello Xubuntu developers and other mailing list followers, I'm very glad to announce that Jack Fromm (IRC: jjfrv8) is the new Xubuntu Documentation lead! The change is effective immediately. Jack has been an immense and awesome asset for us with our documentation so far. He was a key p

Re: 12.04 documentation SRU – Call for reviewers

After reading thru the documentation, i can confirm What David found. Cannot see anything else at the moment. However i would like to make one small suggestion (in keeping with the style/tone of the rest of the documentation). In Section 11 - Hardware - Partitioning a device. Can you add that

Re: 12.04 documentation SRU – Call for reviewers

accidentally deleted it.. >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Dave >> Here you go: >> If you're running, or can run 12.04, we'd love you to review the >> documentation. Here's how you do it: >> >> 1) Branch the Precise docs: >>

Re: 12.04 documentation SRU – Call for reviewers

. > > > > regards > > > > Dave > > > > > Here you go: > > If you're running, or can run 12.04, we'd love you to review the > documentation. Here's how you do it: > > 1) Branch the Precise docs: > bzr br

Re: 12.04 documentation SRU – Call for reviewers

On 07/23/2013 06:01 AM, Dave wrote: Can someone kindly resend the build instructions email again please.. stupid here, accidentally deleted it.. regards Dave Here you go: If you're running, or can run 12.04, we'd love you to review the documentation. Here's how you do it:

Re: 12.04 documentation SRU – Call for reviewers

ssing plugin. You can then install this plugin by > > following the wizard" I am not really sure that Parole 0.3 (the one shipped > > with precise) has the missing codec detection and installation wizard, but I > > can not test it, so m

Re: 12.04 documentation SRU – Call for reviewers

roving the documentation for precise. -- David Segura M David, good catches. I did confirm that the version of Parole in Precise does not offer a missing codec installation wizard. I'll go ahead and fix both things in the documentation. Thanks, Jack -- xubuntu-devel mailing lis

Re: 12.04 documentation SRU – Call for reviewers

El 21/07/13 09:52, Pasi Lallinaho escribió: Hello people, there's some progress with the 12.04 documentation SRU! To be exact, we're now at a point where we have done changes for all the chapters and need people review if the documentation is correct. And by we, I mean Jack. Thanks!

12.04 documentation SRU – Call for reviewers

Hello people, there's some progress with the 12.04 documentation SRU! To be exact, we're now at a point where we have done changes for all the chapters and need people review if the documentation is correct. And by we, I mean Jack. Thanks! If you're running, or can run 12.04, w

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On 19/07/13 03:49, Jack Fromm wrote: > Progress update: > > Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 have merge proposals pending. Chapters 9 > and 10 (along with the Intro and chapter 1) don't need any changes. > Chapters 12, 13 and the Appendix look like they'll need little or > nothing. > So unless anybody

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

Progress update: Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 have merge proposals pending. Chapters 9 and 10 (along with the Intro and chapter 1) don't need any changes. Chapters 12, 13 and the Appendix look like they'll need little or nothing. So unless anybody has any objections, I'll try to finish up those

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

references and the chapter out since even though we did document it for R it won't be on the disc until S. We documented apt-offline during R so we could get it seeded in S and the new version has not introduced drastic changes to deal with in the documentation I wrote. Stephen Mich

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

Last night I said I would work on Chapter 5. That went very quickly, so I went on to Chapters 7 and 8 too (printing-scanning.xml and managing-applications.xml). I have a question about Chapter 8. The current Raring/Saucy version that we're backporting says that Xubuntu has two package manage

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

Progress update: I have gone through Chapters 2, 3 and 4 (migrating-upgrading.xml, guide-desktop.xml and guide-default-apps.xml) and submitted a merge proposal for them. I'm going to move on to Chapter 5, (media-apps.xml) unless somebody else has already started on that. As I mentioned earlier

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On 13/07/13 14:37, Jack Fromm wrote: On 07/12/2013 11:10 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Jack Fromm wrote: So I guess this is not like the testcases where we can assign ourselves a bug. What would be the preferred method of letting others know what we're

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On 07/12/2013 11:10 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Jack Fromm wrote: So I guess this is not like the testcases where we can assign ourselves a bug. What would be the preferred method of letting others know what we're working on? Just announce it here? Y

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Jack Fromm wrote: > So I guess this is not like the testcases where we can assign ourselves a > bug. What would be the preferred method of letting others know what we're > working on? Just announce it here? Yeah, coordination via the mailing list should work fin

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On 07/12/2013 06:30 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: On 12/07/13 21:19, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jack Fromm wrote: Lyz, do I remember hearing that this will get deployed with a point release? If that's correct, when is our freeze date? Great question. The po

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On 13/07/13 01:30, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > On 12/07/13 21:19, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jack Fromm wrote: >>> Lyz, do I remember hearing that this will get deployed with a point release? >>> If that's correct, when is our freeze date? >> Great question.

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On 12/07/13 21:19, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jack Fromm wrote: >> Lyz, do I remember hearing that this will get deployed with a point release? >> If that's correct, when is our freeze date? > Great question. The point release is on August 22rd so I *belie

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jack Fromm wrote: > Lyz, do I remember hearing that this will get deployed with a point release? > If that's correct, when is our freeze date? Great question. The point release is on August 22rd so I *believe* we should shoot for having our docs finished 2 weeks

Re: Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

On 7/12/2013 1:16 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: Hi everyone, There has been interest in helping with the docs lately, so we wanted to get rolling with the Stable Release Update (SRU) to the 12.04 documentation. As Pasi explained here[0], we rewrote the documentation in 12.10 cycle and

Getting started with the 12.04 Documentation Stable Release Update

Hi everyone, There has been interest in helping with the docs lately, so we wanted to get rolling with the Stable Release Update (SRU) to the 12.04 documentation. As Pasi explained here[0], we rewrote the documentation in 12.10 cycle and now wish to copy those changes back to our 12.04

Re: Documentation / Docbook experts/editors, where art thou?

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > On 17/09/12 03:27, James Freer wrote: >> >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Pasi Lallinaho >>> wrote: On 08/30/2012 12:20 AM, James Freer wrote: > > I don't know why b

Re: Documentation / Docbook experts/editors, where art thou?

On 17/09/12 03:27, James Freer wrote: On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: On 08/30/2012 12:20 AM, James Freer wrote: I don't know why but i don't seem to able to get on it. james Looks like the server is down right now if

Re: Documentation / Docbook experts/editors, where art thou?

On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: On 08/30/2012 12:20 AM, James Freer wrote: I don't know why but i don't seem to able to get on it. james Looks like the server is down right now if that's what you mean. We'll fix it ASAP

Re: Reviewing the documentation

erything is appropriately settled for the ubuntu-doc team to look at it since they are the ones who actually have to approve by Thursday (we had to move it, but it looks like we'll have to move it again...) Once we have a formal check-in place, we'll let you know. Dan, the documentation h

Re: Reviewing the documentation

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Dan 'Da Man' wrote: > What method are people using to render the source code at lp:xubuntu-docs or > Pasi's code branch? Pasi's branch, but we're in the middle of moving things around so everything is appropriately settled for the ubuntu-doc team to look at it si

Re: Reviewing the documentation

Videos > 4/Burning CDs and DVDs > 5/Network Connections; RE-REVIEW > 5/Troubleshooting; RE-REVIEW > 5/Connecting to Servers > 6/Printing > 6/Scanning > 9/Suspending and Hibernating your computer; RE-REVIEW > 10/Administrative tasks > 10/Users and Groups > 11/The command

Re: Documentation review update

g the list at > xubuntu-devel-ow...@lists.ubuntu.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of xubuntu-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > >1. Re: Documentation review update (

Re: Documentation review update

On 09/15/2012 01:21 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: On 09/15/2012 08:20 PM, Jack Fromm wrote: On 09/15/2012 01:15 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: Hey, the pages needing review is (second line is for additional/especial points of interest): 2/Upgrading from and older version of Xubuntu See https://

Re: Documentation review update

On 09/15/2012 08:20 PM, Jack Fromm wrote: > > On 09/15/2012 01:15 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: >> Hey, >> >> the pages needing review is (second line is for additional/especial >> points of interest): >> >> 2/Upgrading from and older version of Xubuntu >> See >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/

Re: Documentation review update

On 09/15/2012 01:15 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: Hey, the pages needing review is (second line is for additional/especial points of interest): 2/Upgrading from and older version of Xubuntu See https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2012-September/008467.html 4/Quick Quide to defaul

Re: Reviewing the documentation

ting to Servers >> 6/Printing >> 6/Scanning >> 9/Suspending and Hibernating your computer; RE-REVIEW >> 10/Administrative tasks >> 10/Users and Groups >> 11/The command line >> >> I've set up a pad to track the documentation reviewing progress [1].

Documentation review update

Hey, the pages needing review is (second line is for additional/especial points of interest): 2/Upgrading from and older version of Xubuntu See https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2012-September/008467.html 4/Quick Quide to default applications Links to support pages should b

Re: Reviewing the documentation

a pad to track the documentation reviewing progress [1]. For those pages that need re-reviewing, please check the pad for more information on what to specifically look for and/or what has changed since the last time it was under review. All the rewritten pages can be found at the documentation

Re: Reviewing the documentation

a pad to track the documentation reviewing progress [1]. For those pages that need re-reviewing, please check the pad for more information on what to specifically look for and/or what has changed since the last time it was under review. All the rewritten pages can be found at the documentation

Re: Reviewing the documentation

a pad to track the documentation reviewing progress [1]. For those pages that need re-reviewing, please check the pad for more information on what to specifically look for and/or what has changed since the last time it was under review. All the rewritten pages can be found at the documentation

Re: Reviewing the documentation

g to Servers >> 6/Printing >> 6/Scanning >> 9/Suspending and Hibernating your computer; RE-REVIEW >> 10/Administrative tasks >> 10/Users and Groups >> 11/The command line >> >> I've set up a pad to track the documentation reviewing progress [1]. For

Re: Reviewing the documentation

a pad to track the documentation reviewing progress [1]. For those pages that need re-reviewing, please check the pad for more information on what to specifically look for and/or what has changed since the last time it was under review. All the rewritten pages can be found at the documentation

Re: Reviewing the documentation

ad to track the documentation reviewing progress [1]. For those pages that need re-reviewing, please check the pad for more information on what to specifically look for and/or what has changed since the last time it was under review. All the rewritten pages can be found at the documentation rewrite

Re: Reviewing the documentation

ad to track the documentation reviewing progress [1]. For those pages that need re-reviewing, please check the pad for more information on what to specifically look for and/or what has changed since the last time it was under review. All the rewritten pages can be found at the documentation rewrite

Re: Reviewing the documentation

On 09/14/2012 04:50 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > On 09/14/2012 04:09 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: >> On 09/14/2012 02:43 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: >>> On 09/14/2012 01:46 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: On 14/09/12 11:24, Dan 'Da Man' wrote: > Pasi, > > Can you let us know what portions of t

Re: Reviewing the documentation

On 09/14/2012 04:09 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > On 09/14/2012 02:43 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: >> On 09/14/2012 01:46 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: >>> On 14/09/12 11:24, Dan 'Da Man' wrote: Pasi, Can you let us know what portions of the rewrite you have converted to DocBook? Can yo

Re: Reviewing the documentation

On 09/14/2012 02:43 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > On 09/14/2012 01:46 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: >> On 14/09/12 11:24, Dan 'Da Man' wrote: >>> Pasi, >>> >>> Can you let us know what portions of the rewrite you have converted >>> to DocBook? Can you push your bzr branch to launchpad.net >>>

Re: Reviewing the documentation

On 09/14/2012 01:46 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > On 14/09/12 11:24, Dan 'Da Man' wrote: >> Pasi, >> >> Can you let us know what portions of the rewrite you have converted >> to DocBook? Can you push your bzr branch to launchpad.net >> so that we could avoid redundancy of the

Re: Reviewing the documentation

On 14/09/12 11:24, Dan 'Da Man' wrote: Pasi, Can you let us know what portions of the rewrite you have converted to DocBook? Can you push your bzr branch to launchpad.net so that we could avoid redundancy of the conversion? Every section/subpage that is underlined in

Re: Reviewing the documentation

Pasi, Can you let us know what portions of the rewrite you have converted to DocBook? Can you push your bzr branch to launchpad.net so that we could avoid redundancy of the conversion? On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Dan 'Da Man'

Re: Reviewing the documentation

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Dan 'Da Man' wrote: > Where are the DocBook conversions going to be housed/stored? Are you using > a script to do the conversion or will it be done manually? It's being done manually. The current docs live in bzr on on launchpad.net here: https://code.launchpad.

Re: Reviewing the documentation

ubleshooting; RE-REVIEW > 5/Connecting to Servers > 6/Printing > 6/Scanning > 9/Suspending and Hibernating your computer; RE-REVIEW > 10/Administrative tasks > 10/Users and Groups > 11/The command line > > I've set up a pad to track the documentation reviewing prog

Reviewing the documentation

and DVDs 5/Network Connections; RE-REVIEW 5/Troubleshooting; RE-REVIEW 5/Connecting to Servers 6/Printing 6/Scanning 9/Suspending and Hibernating your computer; RE-REVIEW 10/Administrative tasks 10/Users and Groups 11/The command line I've set up a pad to track the documentation reviewing progress

Re: Documentation rewrite - Music

On 07/09/12 10:46, Elfy wrote: On 06/09/12 17:07, Elfy wrote: Checked through a lot of pages today - lot's of these have already been noted on the m/l , but thought I'd do a list of the whole thing to try and get it all in the same place. * *What is Xubuntu?

  1   2   3   >