Hello,
> So, MyXaml isn't just an XML UI language. In fact,
> from my blog posts, you
> can see that it can instantiate data tables and
> other classes. The fact
> that I demonstrate it for UI stuff is two reasons:
> it's visual, and
> therefore easily understandable, and it IS a good
> use of t
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 09:59 -0400, Marc Clifton wrote:
> For a language that is capable of just instantiating the UI components,
> "XUL" seems best, IMO. But what I'm fuzzy about is the differences between
> XUL and XUI. Also, whether the "X" means "xml" or "eXtensible" is
> confusing, because th
Hi Gerald,
Thanks for the feedback! I personally feel that this is a difficult but
important issue to get my arms around. As I mentioned in the xaml-talk post
(great idea, BTW!), I think it's important to separate MS-XAML from what I
would call "pure" XAML.
You said:
> XAML is an XML UI langua
