Hi Bruce,
Could you please help to merge below patches to the preempt-rt kernel
branch "v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/ti-sdk-6.1/ti-j7xxx"?
This is preempt-rt kernel to upgrade BSP to TI SDK
ti-processor-sdk-linux-adas-j784s4-evm-09_00_01_02.
The following changes since commit
Hi Bruce,
Could you please help to merge below patches to kernel branch
"v6.1/standard/ti-sdk-6.1/ti-j7xxx"?
This is to upgrade BSP to TI SDK
ti-processor-sdk-linux-adas-j784s4-evm-09_00_01_02.
The following changes since commit 122d72613aea7d4f4673c70020eb9a0fc41c9e51:
Merge branch
>If libvtv is a separate library (I've not looked)
It is a separate library whose source is inside the gcc source folder. Much
of the documentation for enabling vtable verify is for compiling gcc from
source outside of Yocto and just references using the flag with ./configure
when building gcc
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 09:40 -0500, Alex Roberts wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm having trouble getting gcc-cross-9.3.0 recipe to build libvtv. I
> have added “—enable-vtable-verify” to EXTRA_OECONF via a .bbappend.
> The vtable stubs are added to libstdc++ but libvtv itself is not
> compiled. This
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023, 12:05 Reyna, David, wrote:
> Hi Marta!
>
> > What about 11am Pacific on tomorrow (28 Sept or Oct 3)?
>
> Let us aim for October 3 so that I can prepare a full demo..
>
> > I think that you have meant 10am to 2PM, otherwise 1am Pacific would
> work very well for me too
>
> I
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.3_M3.rc9) was completed on the autobuilder
and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.3_M3.rc9
Build URL:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/83/builds/5949
Build hash information:
Hello All,
I'm having trouble getting gcc-cross-9.3.0 recipe to build libvtv. I
have added “—enable-vtable-verify” to EXTRA_OECONF via a .bbappend.
The vtable stubs are added to libstdc++ but libvtv itself is not
compiled. This causes recipes compiling with -fstandard-verify to fail
because
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman
---
config.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/config.py b/config.py
index ca37dd1..a9433be 100644
--- a/config.py
+++ b/config.py
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ all_workers = workers + workers_bringup + workers_buildperf
+ workers_arm
#
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman
---
schedulers.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py
index 2f7a8ab..b70b5ed 100644
--- a/schedulers.py
+++ b/schedulers.py
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ branchdefaults = {
'branch_meta-aws': 'mickledore',
In message: [linux-yocto][v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv6.1/xlnx-soc][PATCH]
misc: Kconfig: drop the merge conflicted hunk
on 27/09/2023 quanyang.w...@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Quanyang Wang
>
> The kernel option OPEN_DICE has been removed in commit 9989598547560
> ("drivers: misc: Add
In message: [linux-yocto] pci: dwc: pci-imx6: Set the deinit callback to
imx6_pcie_host_deinit()
on 27/09/2023 Kevin Hao wrote:
> From: Kevin Hao
>
> This is the deinit callback introduced by the SDK version, so we should
> use this instead of imx6_pcie_host_deinit().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin
In message: [linux-yocto] net: hsr: Reapply the change for fill_frame_info()
on 27/09/2023 Kevin Hao wrote:
> From: Kevin Hao
>
> The change introduced by commit 6a4480c5e6eb ("hsr: Fix uninit-value
> access in fill_frame_info()") were lost when fixing the merge
> conflicts. Restore it back.
>
In message: Re: [linux-yocto] arm_sdei: Drop the wrong declaration of
sdei_init()
on 27/09/2023 Kevin Hao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 06:53:44PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > From: Kevin Hao
> >
> > These were added mistakenly when fixing the merge conflicts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin
This is the second chunk that my sanity script missed. Something is clearly
wrong.
Thanks for the fix, I was going to complete my release activities on the
stable kernel's today and this saves me time.
Bruce
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 8:01 AM wrote:
> From: Quanyang Wang
>
> The kernel option
From: Quanyang Wang
The kernel option OPEN_DICE has been removed in commit 9989598547560
("drivers: misc: Add Support for TMR Manager"). Remove it to fix the
merge conflicted hunk.
Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang
---
Hi Bruce,
Would you please help merge this patch to the branch:
Hmm. This should have been picked up by my sanity scripts. I'll have to
figure out what went wrong.
Bruce
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 5:02 AM Kevin Hao wrote:
> From: Kevin Hao
>
> And the transaction->t_handle_lock is also not needed in the new
> codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
> ---
> Hi
From: Kevin Hao
This is the deinit callback introduced by the SDK version, so we should
use this instead of imx6_pcie_host_deinit().
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
Hi Bruce,
Please help me merge this into the following two branches:
v6.1/standard/nxp-sdk-6.1/nxp-soc
Hi Quentin,
On Wed 2023-09-27 @ 09:59:57 AM, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
> On 9/27/23 04:42, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb
> > b/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb
> > new file mode 100644
> > index
From: Kevin Hao
The change introduced by commit 6a4480c5e6eb ("hsr: Fix uninit-value
access in fill_frame_info()") were lost when fixing the merge
conflicts. Restore it back.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
Hi Bruce,
Please help me merge this into the following two branches:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 06:53:44PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> From: Kevin Hao
>
> These were added mistakenly when fixing the merge conflicts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
> ---
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Please help me merge this into the following two branches:
> v5.15/standard/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon
>
From: Kevin Hao
These were added mistakenly when fixing the merge conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
Hi Bruce,
Please help me merge this into the following two branches:
v5.15/standard/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon
v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon
include/linux/arm_sdei.h | 2 --
Has anyone an idea? (see below)
Best,
Holger
Von: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org im Auftrag von
Sebert, Holger.ext
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. September 2023 18:58
An: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org
Betreff: [Ext] [yocto] overlayroot: When is the RW layer
Hi Marta!
> What about 11am Pacific on tomorrow (28 Sept or Oct 3)?
Let us aim for October 3 so that I can prepare a full demo..
> I think that you have meant 10am to 2PM, otherwise 1am Pacific would work
> very well for me too
I actually did mean 2:00 am Pacific. I do work with our India
From: Kevin Hao
And the transaction->t_handle_lock is also not needed in the new
codes.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
Hi Bruce,
Please help me merge this into the v5.15/standard/base branch.
fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 21 -
1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi Trevor,
On 9/27/23 04:42, Trevor Woerner wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb
b/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb
new file mode 100644
index ..7fefb017053b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
Hi David,
Thank you very much for the description and the offer to get a demo.
As discussed yesterday in the call, there are some other people who
seem interested.
> PROPOSAL 1: If the full triage is too much to bite off to start with, perhaps
> using it to track and coordinate work will bring
26 matches
Mail list logo
