merged.
Bruce
In message: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache][yocto-6.1][PATCH] ti-j7xxx: add
MICROSEMI_PHY and CPSW bridge configs
on 27/10/2023 Xulin Sun wrote:
> - Add the MICROSEMI_PHY of VSC8514 phy to support J7X-VSC8514-ETH card.
> - Add several CPSW bridge related configs to support CPSW
In message: [V2][linux-yocto][v5.10/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH] net:
replace raw_write_seqcount_t_begin by do_raw_write_seqcount_begin
on 26/10/2023 Li Wang wrote:
> From: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves"
>
> commit 3b5b679fc12ca9aa310862d5f0a6e23d6151c6a4 linux-stable-rt v5.10-rt-next
>
>
merged.
Bruce
In message: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache yocto-6.1][PATCH] nxp-imx7: set
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE to n
on 26/10/2023 Xiaolei Wang wrote:
> Disable CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE to fix the warning when
> do_kernel_configcheck:
>
> [NOTE]: 'CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE' last
- Add the MICROSEMI_PHY of VSC8514 phy to support J7X-VSC8514-ETH card.
- Add several CPSW bridge related configs to support CPSW switch mode.
- Add Embedded DisplayPort panels module and change SN65DSI86 to module
to avoid failed to create device link (0x180) with regulator-dp1-prw
since the
On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 15:11 +0200, David Pierret wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've made separate steps for setup and run
> I didn't yet modify the python script in upgrade-helper to include
> Kevin reviews.
>
> follow some questions I have about the autobuilder.
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 3:04 PM David
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 18:17, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> In general you're right, but for AUH and meta-oe, I'm ok with this
> being done serially given what AUH does. We don't really want 11
> workers working on this at the same time?
Yes, I think that's fine for a start, unless it's proven to be
Everything else isn't really necessary and greatly lengthens AUH jobs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
upgrade-helper.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/upgrade-helper.py b/upgrade-helper.py
index 4f0b6b7..1176a73 100755
--- a/upgrade-helper.py
+++
On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 15:53 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> This looks basically ok, but how can this be tested if needed changes
> to AUH are still in review?
>
> Running auh over meta-oe layers shouldn't be defined as steps that are
> run one after the other, but as separate parallelizable
From: Ross Burton
We want to run the metrics target against meta-oe too, so we need to
tell autobuilder2 to clone the repository.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
config.py | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/config.py b/config.py
index 7ee235c..50945b4 100644
--- a/config.py
This looks basically ok, but how can this be tested if needed changes
to AUH are still in review?
Running auh over meta-oe layers shouldn't be defined as steps that are
run one after the other, but as separate parallelizable jobs, e.g.
"auh-meta-oe" : {
...
"auh-meta-python" : {
...
etc. They
We are hosting a workshop on Monday, February 5th 2024 in Brussels. Yes
exactly, the day right after FOSDEM. So make sure to extend your stay and
share your findings or the things you bring. How? By submitting to the OE
Workshop 2024 CFP. Open now and waiting for you.
Hi,
I've made separate steps for setup and run
I didn't yet modify the python script in upgrade-helper to include
Kevin reviews.
follow some questions I have about the autobuilder.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 3:04 PM David Pierret via
lists.yoctoproject.org
wrote:
>
> - Modify the setup-auh to use
- Modify the setup-auh to use repositories cloned by the auto-builder.
Manage the case where meta-openembedded is not used.
- Modify the run-auh to manage the optional additional layer.
Only 1 layer can be provided.
- Add auh-meta-openembedded job with 1 step per layer.
Signed-off-by: David
From: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves"
commit 3b5b679fc12ca9aa310862d5f0a6e23d6151c6a4 linux-stable-rt v5.10-rt-next
Commit a8dd21118b0fa ("seqlock: Prefix internal seqcount_t-only macros with a
"do_""), among other changes, renames the function raw_write_seqcount_t_begin
to
Hi Paul,
1.
the issue is about where the function define: raw_write_seqcount_t_begin?
the update from v5.10.197 to v5.10.198 recently, it remove the function
define in:
commit a8dd21118b0fa33efd09b713cef79d02e72719e2
Author: Ahmed S. Darwish
Date: Sun Dec 6 17:21:42 2020 +0100
Disable CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE to fix the warning when
do_kernel_configcheck:
[NOTE]: 'CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE' last val (n) and .config val (y) do not
match
[INFO]: CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE : y ## .config: 210
:configs/v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/arch/arm/arm.cfg (y)
16 matches
Mail list logo