Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Question of Yocto dunfell LTS period

I received the answer to this question in IRC on 10/29/2021. 16:06 < jatedev> I saw a wiki edit that said dunfell's LTS period is now through April 2024, but I've seen no announcements. Any truth to this rumor? 16:20

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Question of Yocto dunfell LTS period

On 1/14/22 2:36 AM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: > I received the answer to this question in IRC on 10/29/2021. > > 16:06 >   > I saw a wiki edit that said dunfell's LTS period is now through April > 2024, but I've seen no announcements. A

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Question of Yocto dunfell LTS period

Actually, I think this was some kind of missed PR opportunity. Regular distros, such as RHEL, Debian and everyone else, are constantly trotting out their support windows as the reason to hand them the job of making products, so we could counter that better perhaps. Alex On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 06:

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Question of Yocto dunfell LTS period

Funny you mention PR. It would also help if recipes staying on the same version but adding patches for e.g. CVE fixes should increase their PR value so their rebuilt versions can be put into a package repo. Throwing away the buildroot (as suggested any time some obscure build error happens) and

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Question of Yocto dunfell LTS period

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 12:41, Zoltan Boszormenyi via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > It would also help if recipes staying on the same version > but adding patches for e.g. CVE fixes should increase their > PR value so their rebuilt versions can be put into a package repo. > > Throwing away the bu