Here are the notes from the May 17th Yocto Technical Team meeting.
Thanks.
- Julie
Attendees: Mark (Wind River, OE steering, user space), Darren (Intel, kernel),
Julie (Intel, program management), Beth (Intel, build/release, statistics,
autobuilder), Dave Stewart (Intel, engineering manager), T
Yocto Team:
On May 19th at 8am Pacific, we will hold a Go/No-Go meeting for the Yocto 1.0.1
release. Per our discussions on the May 17th Technical Team meeting, we
believe there is a show-stopper that will need to get fixed before we can
release Yocto 1.0.1. However, we agreed to use the Go/No
Fixes gcc 4.6.0 compliation issues by importing the upstream change:
Author: Michal Marek
Date: Mon May 2 12:13:01 2011 +
kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+
Starting with 4.4, gcc will happily accept -Wno- in the
cc-option test and complain late
Repeating the patch contents here, since that's the
whole story:
Fixes bug: [YOCTO #1035]
Fixes bug: [YOCTO #1036]
Fixes gcc 4.6.0 compliation issues by importing the upstream change:
Author: Michal Marek
Date: Mon May 2 12:13:01 2011 +
kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4
>From 92ad9ce8e770b46df38ed015486c76efe502f382 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
<92ad9ce8e770b46df38ed015486c76efe502f382.1305736112.git.bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>
In-Reply-To:
References:
From: Bruce Ashfield
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 12:07:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] linux-yocto: fix gc
Hi Daniel,
One more thing to check, do you have a build dir under your Yocto checkout? If
so that maybe the reason prevent a new bitbake commander project being created
since the build dir can contain large contents that Eclipse IProject tree view
can't handle, so the work around is to move yo
Hi Liping,
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 09:50 +0800, Liping Ke wrote:
> From: Liping Ke
>
> Below four patches are for putting extra requested fields inito different
> cache files instead of using only on bb_cache.dat. Now image creator need
> extra three fields. And in the future, there might be more
Hi, Richard
Thanks for the detailed design guide. I will sync up with Jessica and redo the
patch.
And thanks for advice of the namedtuple usage. During the implementation,
we did tried several ways of inheritance refactory, but all failed with
nametuple static attributes.
And when trying to cha
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:40 +0800, Ke, Liping wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed design guide. I will sync up with Jessica and redo
> the patch.
>
> And thanks for advice of the namedtuple usage. During the implementation,
> we did tried several ways of inheritance refactory, but all failed with
>
http://free-electrons.com/blog/elc-2011-videos/
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
10 matches
Mail list logo