[yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Saul Wold
We finally did it! After getting some final patches yesterday, we made it to 100% with patch Upsteam-Status. Total Patches Files: 1243 All Upstream-Status: 1243 Fix Upstream-Status: 0 Need Upstream-Status: 0 Pending Upstream-Status: 461 This means we have 461 patches to now work their way

Re: [yocto] Raspberry Pi

2012-02-08 Thread Jack Mitchell
On 08/02/12 02:36, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Joshua Lockj...@linux.intel.com wrote: Somehow they managed to convince Broadcom to release a datasheet for the SoC: http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/615 One of my friends sent me a funny quote he saw today: The

Re: [yocto] RFC: Hob 1.2 design

2012-02-08 Thread Barros Pena, Belen
Just to clarify: videos show relevant functionality to a specific design piece. The fact that a video does not show something it doesn't mean the functionality has gone away. If I showed everything on each video they would be very very long (and very very boring) videos. I hope this explains.

[yocto] sysroot and boost.m4 library search path problem

2012-02-08 Thread Joshua Immanuel
Hello all, While trying to build my user space application in yocto, the boost.m4 was looking packages in the host (i.e host contamination, thereby resulting in configure error). This appears to be a problem in boost.m4 which ignores the sysroot option while searching for libraries. In the

Re: [yocto] sysroot and boost.m4 library search path problem

2012-02-08 Thread Joshua Immanuel
Hello all, On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:19 +0530, Joshua Immanuel wrote: To address this problem, I've written a patch for boost.m4 specifically for yocto. I believe this will be helpful to others who are using boost libraries. I guess, I have to send a separate patch to boost.m4 maintainer using

Re: [yocto] Building your own UI

2012-02-08 Thread autif khan
This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. Suppose you have a project where you need a very custom user interface. Not just a series of applications that appear on a desktop like you see in sato, or Gnome, or KDE.  Basically your application becomes the UI. I can see 2 approaches to

Re: [yocto] Yocto in Virtualbox

2012-02-08 Thread autif khan
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:14 AM, cnxsoft cnxs...@cnx-software.com wrote: Hi, I have build x86 qemu image using bitbake -k core-image-sato following the instructions given at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.1/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html I'm running Ubuntu 11.10 in VirtualBox

Re: [yocto] Yocto in Virtualbox

2012-02-08 Thread cnxsoft
On 08/02/2012 21:06, autif khan wrote: On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:14 AM, cnxsoftcnxs...@cnx-software.com wrote: Hi, I have build x86 qemu image using bitbake -k core-image-sato following the instructions given at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.1/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html I'm

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Stewart, David C
From: Saul Wold [mailto:saul.w...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 1:12 AM We finally did it! After getting some final patches yesterday, we made it to 100% with patch Upsteam-Status. Total Patches Files: 1243 All Upstream-Status: 1243 Fix Upstream-Status: 0 Need

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Osier-mixon, Jeffrey
This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website reflecting this. Just so I am clear, what exactly is this 100% of? Do we have no local patches to upstream projects at all? On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Stewart, David C david.c.stew...@intel.comwrote: From: Saul Wold

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 09:34:56 Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website reflecting this. Just so I am clear, what exactly is this 100% of? Do we have no local patches to upstream projects at all? Not quite - we still have most of

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey jeffrey.osier-mi...@intel.com wrote: This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website reflecting this. Just so I am clear, what exactly is this 100% of? Do we have no local patches to upstream projects at all? it means

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Osier-mixon, Jeffrey
Ah, documentation :) excellent On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey jeffrey.osier-mi...@intel.com wrote: This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website reflecting this. Just so I am

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/08/2012 10:04 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: Ah, documentation :) excellent Jefro: You can get more info about this from Mark's OE page: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines The Key thing to note on my numbers is that we have 461 patches that could

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Björn Stenberg
Saul Wold wrote: After getting some final patches yesterday, we made it to 100% with patch Upsteam-Status. Who sets the Upstream-Status? Are there guidelines how to do it? I spoke to the author of curl and mentioned the two patches in Yocto against it, both of which are marked as

[yocto] About Pandaboard

2012-02-08 Thread Sertaç Olgunsoylu
Hi, I've recently found this amazing project and I'd really love to contribute to it. So, I have a question. Is there any ongoing effort or interest on adding Pandaboard to the supported hardware? If so, I'd like to give a hand to you. I can test software stack on that platform, file bugs and try

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/08/2012 02:07 AM, Björn Stenberg wrote: Saul Wold wrote: After getting some final patches yesterday, we made it to 100% with patch Upsteam-Status. Who sets the Upstream-Status? Are there guidelines how to do it? The developer of the patch submitted to any OE branch (oe-core, meta-oe,

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Björn Stenberg b...@enea.com wrote: Who sets the Upstream-Status? Are there guidelines how to do it? patch author importer whoever brings this patch in into oe. Sometimes there might be judgement error on patches thats why I said for most of them it reflects the

Re: [yocto] About Pandaboard

2012-02-08 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Sertaç Olgunsoylu sertacolgunso...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've recently found this amazing project and I'd really love to contribute to it. So, I have a question. Is there any ongoing effort or interest on adding Pandaboard to the supported hardware? If so, I'd

Re: [yocto] Building your own UI

2012-02-08 Thread Sean Liming
This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. Suppose you have a project where you need a very custom user interface. Not just a series of applications that appear on a desktop like you see in sato, or Gnome, or KDE.  Basically your application becomes the UI. I can see 2

Re: [yocto] Building your own UI

2012-02-08 Thread jfabernathy
On 02/07/2012 07:47 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: On 07/02/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote: On 02/07/2012 01:54 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: On 07/02/12 07:57, James Abernathy wrote: This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. Suppose you have a project where you need a very custom user interface.

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Saul Wold wrote: If the author of curl would like to review and/or implement modification for OE that would be awesome, feel free to share the patches with them. I am the maintainer of curl. The curl patches Björn mentioned are clearly not written in way intended to be

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Stenberg dan...@haxx.se wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Saul Wold wrote: If the author of curl would like to review and/or implement modification for OE that would be awesome, feel free to share the patches with them. I am the maintainer of curl. The curl

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2012, 10:45 -0800 schrieb Saul Wold: On 02/08/2012 10:04 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: Ah, documentation :) excellent Saul, thank you for the update and enforcing that requirement from the commit and patch message guidelines. Jefro: You can get more info about

Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100%

2012-02-08 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/08/2012 01:26 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Saul Wold wrote: If the author of curl would like to review and/or implement modification for OE that would be awesome, feel free to share the patches with them. I am the maintainer of curl. The curl patches Björn mentioned

Re: [yocto] Building your own UI

2012-02-08 Thread Joshua Lock
On 08/02/12 12:52, jfabernathy wrote: On 02/07/2012 07:47 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: On 07/02/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote: On 02/07/2012 01:54 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: On 07/02/12 07:57, James Abernathy wrote: This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. Suppose you have a project where you

Re: [yocto] Yocto in Virtualbox

2012-02-08 Thread cnxsoft
On 09/02/2012 00:00, Scott Garman wrote: On 02/08/2012 12:14 AM, cnxsoft wrote: Hi, I have build x86 qemu image using bitbake -k core-image-sato following the instructions given at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.1/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html I'm running Ubuntu 11.10 in

Re: [yocto] Yocto in Virtualbox

2012-02-08 Thread Scott Garman
On 02/08/2012 06:01 PM, cnxsoft wrote: On 09/02/2012 00:00, Scott Garman wrote: On 02/08/2012 12:14 AM, cnxsoft wrote: Hi, I have build x86 qemu image using bitbake -k core-image-sato following the instructions given at

[yocto] applying a custom kernel configuration to the built in routerstation pro bsp?

2012-02-08 Thread David Smoot
I want to change some of the kernel configuration options for my routerstation pro. I have a .config from a 2.6.37 kernel running on my routerstation pro that was not built in Yocto that has the options I want to build in Yocto. I am attempting to follow the instructions at

Re: [yocto] applying a custom kernel configuration to the built in routerstation pro bsp?

2012-02-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:08 PM, David Smoot davidsm...@gmail.com wrote: I want to change some of the kernel configuration options for my routerstation pro.  I have a .config from a 2.6.37 kernel running on my routerstation pro that was not built in Yocto that has the options I want to build

Re: [yocto] sysroot and boost.m4 library search path problem

2012-02-08 Thread Joshua Immanuel
Hello McClintock, On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 15:44 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: Did you consider taking this patch and adding it to the proper recipe? The patch is basically for boost.m4. We have the boost package in 'meta' layer. But, boost.m4 is not a part of boost library, it is