Re: [yocto] [PATCHv2 0/3][eclipse-poky] Add option to allow building from local repo

2012-12-11 Thread Timo Müller
Hi Paul, Paul Eggleton wrote, On 10.12.2012 18:36: Hi Timo, On Monday 10 December 2012 09:13:41 m...@timomueller.eu wrote: From: Timo Mueller Hi, I've rebased the patch series. It should now apply to the current master. Best regards, Timo From the original cover letter: if you

[yocto] [PATCHv3 1/3] scripts/build.sh: Added function to use the local repository for building

2012-12-11 Thread mail
From: Timo Mueller If USE_LOCAL_GIT_REPO is set to 1 the build scripts uses the local repository of the eclipse poky project for building instead of the upstream project. The local repository is derived from the location for the build script. Signed-off-by: Timo Mueller --- scripts/build.sh |

[yocto] [PATCHv3 2/3] scripts/build.sh: Added help option to the cmdline

2012-12-11 Thread mail
From: Timo Mueller Calling the build script with the -h option will now show the usage. The cmdline parsing can be extended to add new options in the future. Signed-off-by: Timo Mueller --- scripts/build.sh | 18 ++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --gi

[yocto] [PATCHv3 0/3][eclipse-poky] Add option to allow building from local repo

2012-12-11 Thread mail
From: Timo Mueller Hi, as Paul requested I've signed-off the patches. Other than that it's still the rebased patch series from PATCHv2. Best regards, Timo >From the original cover letter: if you build eclipse-poky with the provided build script it will always use the upstream version

[yocto] [PATCHv3 3/3] script/build.sh: Added option to enable building from local repository.

2012-12-11 Thread mail
From: Timo Mueller If the script is called with the -l option the local git repository is used instead of the upstream repository. Signed-off-by: Timo Mueller --- scripts/build.sh |6 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/build.sh b/scripts/build.sh

[yocto] Is LICENSE in a recipe of groff correct

2012-12-11 Thread Matsumoto, Hiroo
Hi A recipe of groff, which is meta/recipes-extended/groff/groff_1.20.1.bb, shows that license of groff is GPLv2, but COPYING file in groff-1.20.1 shows that license of groff is GPLv3. I think that license is GPLv2 until groff-1.19.2 and is GPLv3 from groff-1.20.1. Regards. Hiroo MATSUMOTO __

[yocto] [PATCH] [eclipse-poky-windows][branch:windows-build]Remove validate existing repository radio button

2012-12-11 Thread Ioana Grigoropol
- remove radio button for validating existing repository but keep performing the validation in the back - make 'clone' button a check button Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol --- .../yocto/bc/ui/wizards/install/OptionsPage.java | 40 +--- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 d

[yocto] should users be able to run yocto's pre-built images standalone?

2012-12-11 Thread Robert P. J. Day
following up on my updated QEMU page here: http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Running_pre-built_QEMU_images a basic question -- is it supported that users be able to download and run yocto's pre-built QEMU images without having to download an entire build system, and set up bitbake, etc?

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] [eclipse-poky-windows][branch:windows-build]Remove validate existing repository radio button

2012-12-11 Thread Laurentiu Palcu
Why don't you remove the commented code completely? You can always look into file's git history if you need to. Thanks, Laurentiu On 12/11/2012 01:03 PM, Ioana Grigoropol wrote: > - remove radio button for validating existing repository but keep performing > the validation in the back > - make '

[yocto] [PATCH v2] [eclipse-poky-windows][branch:windows-build]Remove validate existing repository radio button

2012-12-11 Thread Ioana Grigoropol
- remove radio button for validating existing repository but keep performing the validation in the back - make 'clone' button a check button Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol --- .../yocto/bc/ui/wizards/install/OptionsPage.java | 29 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 24 de

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] [eclipse-poky-windows][branch:windows-build]Remove validate existing repository radio button

2012-12-11 Thread Grigoropol, IoanaX
Sure. Patch resent to list. Thanks, Ioana -Original Message- From: Palcu, Laurentiu Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:28 PM To: Grigoropol, IoanaX Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH] [eclipse-poky-windows][branch:windows-build]Remove validate existing repository rad

[yocto] [PATCH v3] [eclipse-poky-windows][branch:windows-build]Remove validate existing repository radio button

2012-12-11 Thread Ioana Grigoropol
- remove radio button for validating existing repository but keep performing the validation in the back - make 'clone' button a check button Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol --- .../yocto/bc/ui/wizards/install/OptionsPage.java | 30 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 24 de

Re: [yocto] should users be able to run yocto's pre-built images standalone?

2012-12-11 Thread Rudolf Streif
Hi Robert, > a basic question -- is it supported that users be able to download and > run yocto's pre-built QEMU images without having to download an entire > build system, and set up bitbake, etc? theoretically, of course, it > can be done, but it's not set up to do it conveniently (if it even

[yocto] Boot failure when adding the meta-oe layer

2012-12-11 Thread Zach Tibbitts
I'm working on an embedded Linux platform for work to run an app that's written with Gtk+3. The hardware in question is a Sandy Bridge Core i3 platform. With a vanilla Yocto build, I can boot an image just fine (I've tested with core-image-basic, core-image-minimal, and core-image-x11) and everythi

[yocto] jffs2 change erase block size / page size

2012-12-11 Thread Maxime Moge
Hi, I need to know where can i configure the jffs2 image type in the yocto directory? Thanks in advance for the reply. Von:"Robert P. J. Day" An: Yocto discussion list Datum: 12/11/2012 02:08 PM Betreff:[yocto] should users be able to run yocto's pre-built images standal

Re: [yocto] Boot failure when adding the meta-oe layer

2012-12-11 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 12:54:57 Zach Tibbitts wrote: > I'm working on an embedded Linux platform for work to run an app that's > written with Gtk+3. The hardware in question is a Sandy Bridge Core i3 > platform. With a vanilla Yocto build, I can boot an image just fine (I've > tested with core

[yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

2012-12-11 Thread Saul Wold
Attendees: PaulE, MihaiL, MichaelH, LaurentuiS, TomZ, ScottR, CristianI, JeffP, MarkH, RichardP, JessicaZ, Nitin, Eran, DavidW, Ramana, Saul and possibly others lurking Minutes: * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * Yocto 1.4 status - 10 min (Song/team) - 1.4 / Master: a couple of issues with

Re: [yocto] Boot failure when adding the meta-oe layer

2012-12-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 11 December 2012 18:11, Paul Eggleton wrote: > This is a known issue in meta-oe unfortunately; the udev version there > apparently does not work outside of use with systemd. I believe the plan is to > drop udev from meta-oe fairly soon. Oh, so that's why my recent builds are breaking... Can I

Re: [yocto] Boot failure when adding the meta-oe layer

2012-12-11 Thread Philip Balister
On 12/11/2012 01:11 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 11 December 2012 12:54:57 Zach Tibbitts wrote: I'm working on an embedded Linux platform for work to run an app that's written with Gtk+3. The hardware in question is a Sandy Bridge Core i3 platform. With a vanilla Yocto build, I can boot a

[yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-11 Thread Trevor Woerner
Hi, Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_) still supported? From this: http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/4671/ it would appear not. However poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/machine/example.conf contains IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_ext3 (which would make it appear as though they are). Be

Re: [yocto] Disabling PREMIRRORS and upstream sources

2012-12-11 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Isn't this set up in the local.conf file for global use? Also, Jon, what documentation are you referring to here? Are you looking at the latest Yocto Project documentation (e.g. http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.4/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html for the Yocto Project Reference Manual?).

Re: [yocto] Difference of toolchain recipes

2012-12-11 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
I think what I am going to do is document these in general as part of the "Terms" section in the YP Development Manual where the term "Cross-Development Toolchain" is defined. Would putting such a high-level list in the YP documentation be unnecessary or helpful? Scott >-Original Message-

Re: [yocto] [PATCHv3 0/3][eclipse-poky] Add option to allow building from local repo

2012-12-11 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Merged to eclipse-poky master. Thanks, Jessica -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of m...@timomueller.eu Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 12:13 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Cc: Timo Mueller Subject: [yocto] [PATCHv3

Re: [yocto] [PATCH v3] [eclipse-poky-windows][branch:windows-build]Remove validate existing repository radio button

2012-12-11 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Hi Ioana, I merged your patches up to this one to jzhang/windows-build branch of eclipse-poky. Please send out the final patches for Linux performance improvements that we've discussed. Also, many java files there's a comment section at the beginning, can you add some comments about your chan

[yocto] New Documentation: Linux Kernel Development with the Yocto Project

2012-12-11 Thread Darren Hart
In response to much feedback on the linux-yocto recipes and the associated kernel tools, we have made a number of improvements in an attempt to make them more accessible. In particular, the tools now allow for using your own sources and configurations in a fairly simple manner, while providing a pa

Re: [yocto] New Documentation: Linux Kernel Development with the Yocto Project

2012-12-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-12-11 06:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote: In response to much feedback on the linux-yocto recipes and the associated kernel tools, we have made a number of improvements in an attempt to make them more accessible. In particular, the tools now allow for using your own sources and configurations in a

Re: [yocto] Disabling PREMIRRORS and upstream sources

2012-12-11 Thread Jon Szymaniak
>>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Jon Szymaniak >>Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 7:19 AM >>To: yocto@yoctoproject.org >>Subject: [yocto] Disabling PREMIRRORS and upstream sources >> >>Is there a simple way to disable the use of PREMIRROR

Re: [yocto] [PATCH runqemu] runqemu: add support for FSTYPE=vmdk

2012-12-11 Thread Scott Garman
On 12/10/2012 05:55 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: Allow vmdk images to be run through the 'runqemu' facility. This looks ok without having tested it personally. Could you just add a signed-off-by line to the commit? Thanks for this, Scott --- scripts/runqemu | 39 ++