Sorry Yin, I've been backlogged. I have it in my preproduction test
setup. I should pull tomorrow if all goes well.
-b
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Yin Kangkai wrote:
> On 2014-05-20, 10:15 +0800, Yin Kangkai wrote:
>> [up post intentionally]
>>
>> I was trying to setup yocto-autobuilder in
On 2014-05-20, 10:15 +0800, Yin Kangkai wrote:
> [up post intentionally]
>
> I was trying to setup yocto-autobuilder in my local env, and customize
> it to my needs (i.e. watch git/gerrit event and only build my
> images). It is a little bit of struggle for me to make it finally work
> (due to the
Hello Community,
This is my first question please excuse if I'm making a silly mistake. I am
just starting learning the yocto project to develop custom linux os. I was
following the few commands to download and setup poky on my build system
from the quick start guide at .
$ git clone http://git.yo
Hello Community,
This is my first question please excuse if I'm making a silly mistake. I am
just starting learning the yocto project to develop custom linux os. I was
following the few commands to download and setup poky on my build system
from the quick start guide at .
$ git clone http://git.yo
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Brian Smucker wrote:
> My followup question is: Can I mix toolchains in this situation?
>
No, not easily. Although you can see if klibc is an option for you.
meta-initramfs has support for that
> Can I compile the initramfs binaries with the uclibc toolchain base
On 5/29/2014 12:38 PM, Søren Holm wrote:
Torsdag den 29. maj 2014 09:49:55 skrev Brian Smucker:
Thanks Soren,
My followup question is: Can I mix toolchains in this situation?
Can I compile the initramfs binaries with the uclibc toolchain based on
the poky-tiny distro and the regular file syste
Torsdag den 29. maj 2014 09:49:55 skrev Brian Smucker:
> Thanks Soren,
>
> My followup question is: Can I mix toolchains in this situation?
>
> Can I compile the initramfs binaries with the uclibc toolchain based on
> the poky-tiny distro and the regular file system binaries with the
> glibc-base
Folks,
We have been testing with GCC 4.9 in master_under_test for sometime now
and it's been passing local testing and sanity testing on the
autobuilder. Since we have the final fix for a PPC ICE issue in place
now, we are moving to GCC 4.9 as the default in master for the 1.7 release.
Ple
Thanks Soren,
My followup question is: Can I mix toolchains in this situation?
Can I compile the initramfs binaries with the uclibc toolchain based on
the poky-tiny distro and the regular file system binaries with the
glibc-based toolchain (based on a different distro)?
If this is possible,
Torsdag den 29. maj 2014 08:07:11 skrev Brian Smucker:
> Hi,
>
> Was wondering why this has not been answered. Maybe it is too dumb of a
> question? If so, let me know or point me to some documentation.
>
I'm declaring an initramfs-image like this. As you can see the recipe is
derived from cor
Hi,
Was wondering why this has not been answered. Maybe it is too dumb of a
question? If so, let me know or point me to some documentation.
Thanks.
Brian
On 5/23/2014 11:37 AM, Brian Smucker wrote:
Hello,
I have an initial ramfs image that I want to convert to Yocto. That is
in addition
I am able to discuss patches and I already collected your patches,
but unfortunately I cannot yet take any decision about them or
about the next apps to be included and bugs to be fixed because
those decisions will be taken after the Linux distro release (in a few days).
Alex
-Original Me
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 07:10:02AM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> On 2014-05-29 06:46, Chris Morgan wrote:
>> > dfu-util 0.7 is the latest release of dfu-util
>>
>> These patches should be sent to the OpenEmbedded mailing list
>>openembedded
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 07:10:02AM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2014-05-29 06:46, Chris Morgan wrote:
> > dfu-util 0.7 is the latest release of dfu-util
>
> These patches should be sent to the OpenEmbedded mailing list
>openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org
>
> Also, check the README in
On 2014-05-29 06:46, Chris Morgan wrote:
dfu-util 0.7 is the latest release of dfu-util
These patches should be sent to the OpenEmbedded mailing list
openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org
Also, check the README in your repository for details, in particular
the use of git send-mail for pa
From 573dc43515a41ade2d2cf1a5ebfbf8ec3701ea81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Morgan
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 08:36:37 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Remove old dfu-util 0.1 recipe
Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/dfu-util/dfu-util_0.1.bb | 10 --
1 file changed,
dfu-util 0.7 is the latest release of dfu-util
From 0a85d88e93de1707aa9b7ee41065d8c3db0acd66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Morgan
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 08:35:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] dfu-util 0.7 recipe
dfu-util 0.7 is the latest release of dfu-util
Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan
---
Hey Alex,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Alexandru Vaduva
wrote:
> For the moment we are preparing a release for Enea Linux, and we are fully
> booked.
> After the release we will try to make all the needed steps for the meta-cgl
> layer:
> That means proper information about the layers, main
For the moment we are preparing a release for Enea Linux, and we are fully
booked.
After the release we will try to make all the needed steps for the meta-cgl
layer:
That means proper information about the layers, maintainers and put in place
all the needed procedures.
All this information will
19 matches
Mail list logo