[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW22

Current Dev Position: 1.9 Milestone 1 (M1) Next Deadline: M1 cut off of June 23rd Key Status/Updates: There is an RFC about removing bitbake's update_data datastore operation being considered on the mailing list. YP 1.6.3 and has been released this week. The 1.6.x series will now move to

[yocto] Dropbear configuration

I am trying to configure dropbear to do the following. 1) Only listen on port 22 of the tun0 interface (made by openvpn service). 2) Only use public key authorization. To do this I've overridden the dropbear.socket file with my own. start

Re: [yocto] getting started...

Hi Ed, On 05/27/15 16:32, Ed Sutter wrote: This year I have two ongoing iMX6 based linux projects, and may need to use a beaglebone or RPi for some other small project. The point of the above detail is that I'd like to backup a bit and attempt to use Yocto to organize all four of these

Re: [yocto] overriding equals

On May 29, 2015, at 2:58 PM, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote: If a BSP layer sets a preferred kernel using an equals sign (e.g. PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = linux-raspberrypi) is there any way of overriding this decision that doesn't involve: 1) forking the layer 2) hoping

Re: [yocto] GCC 4.8.2 build errors

This issue ended up going away when I wiped my build folder and started with a new one. On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Jesse Cobra jesseco...@gmail.com wrote: Always reproducible on this build folder. Just created a new build folder and kicked off a brand new build. See if that works...

[yocto] overriding equals

If a BSP layer sets a preferred kernel using an equals sign (e.g. PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = linux-raspberrypi) is there any way of overriding this decision that doesn't involve: 1) forking the layer 2) hoping the maintainer accepts a relevant patch 3) creating my own DISTRO ? If I

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

On May 29, 2015 3:37:34 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/29/15 15:28, Nicholas Krause wrote: On May 29, 2015 3:21:04 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote: If it were me, I'd just remove that section altogether. I'm of the opinion that doing development work on

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

On 5/29/15, 12:21 PM, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Scott, On 05/18/15 10:42, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: I have a section in the YP Linux Kernel Development Manual that talks about building out-of-tree-modules on the target - Interestingly enough, I was just reading through that

Re: [yocto] Keybinding on Matchbox, press a key and run an app

Hi Robert, On 05/18/15 13:50, Robert Tulke wrote: Hi i’ve a question, how i can create a keybinding or mapping for a specific key to run an application? So what i want, i’ll press for example F12 and that will start a application? It depends. If you're running a GUI environment with a

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

Ok - so we established that we want it... If I get some clarifications in there about the rarity of the situation that would allow someone to develop on the target and also the benefits of having a verified cross-development system if they were to develop on the host, does the rest of the

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

Hi Scott, On 05/18/15 10:42, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: I have a section in the YP Linux Kernel Development Manual that talks about building out-of-tree-modules on the target - Interestingly enough, I was just reading through that document the other day. As soon as I saw a section titled

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

Hi, I added a clarifying paragraph at the start of this section. Also, for the last paragraph I mentioned kernel-devsrc. I could not find any commits that I understood looking in poky for kernel-devsrc so from the comment you gave Darren about the package not being uniformly installed on all

[yocto] build hello_world.c in yocto

HI team Question what are the necessary IMAGE_INSTALL_append to build a c hello world in an core-image-minimal ? If I just add gcc .. then I need as when I try to gcc -0 hello hello.c I will add gcc and gcc-dev .. anyone else that I might be missing ? Thanks a lot and regards Victor

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

Darren, Thanks for the extra information. I will take action on it and then throw the URL to the section out here in the list for a look. Scott -Original Message- From: Hart, Darren Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 12:59 PM To: Rifenbark, Scott M; Trevor Woerner; yocto@yoctoproject.org Cc:

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

On 05/29/15 15:28, Nicholas Krause wrote: On May 29, 2015 3:21:04 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote: If it were me, I'd just remove that section altogether. I'm of the opinion that doing development work on the target is wrong (if for no other reason than to prove your

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

On 5/29/15, 12:46 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com wrote: Ok - so we established that we want it... If I get some clarifications in there about the rarity of the situation that would allow someone to develop on the target and also the benefits of having a verified

Re: [yocto] Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target

On May 29, 2015 3:21:04 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Scott, On 05/18/15 10:42, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: I have a section in the YP Linux Kernel Development Manual that talks about building out-of-tree-modules on the target - Interestingly enough, I was just reading