[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 2/2] linux-raspberrypi_4.8.bb: Update to 4.8.2

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.8.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.8.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.8.bb index 02623f4..7934747 100644 --- a/recipes-kernel/linux

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/2] firmware: Update to latest

-bsp/common/firmware.inc +++ b/recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -RPIFW_SRCREV ?= "ec63df146f454e8cab7080380f9138246d877013" -RPIFW_DATE ?= "20161005" +RPIFW_SRCREV ?= "ec5a517ed6051974a5a09f7b7811d21c443a7c74" +RPIFW_DATE ?= "20161020" RPIFW_S

[yocto] Yocto on ECS GWS-QX board

Hi, I have a newbee question. We are thinking of installing Yocto linux on ECS board with Intel Quark SoC X1021 processor. How do I make sure that Yocto will work on this board? What are the questions I should ask? The link to the board is below http://www.ecs.com.tw/website2008/Product/Product_O

Re: [yocto] 2.2 release note material

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:25:05 Paul Eggleton wrote: > I've been gathering material for the 2.2 release notes, here is what I have > at the moment. Things missing: > > * Any new features/enhancements for the kernel tools - Bruce, is there > anything worth noting? > > * Known issues that are worth ca

Re: [yocto] 2.2 release note material

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 23:54:59 Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2016-10-19 10:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > I've been gathering material for the 2.2 release notes, here is what I > > have at the moment. Things missing: > > > > * Any new features/enhancements for the kernel tools - Bruce, is there > > an

Re: [yocto] ppc-fixplt.patch - ERROR: Function failed patch_do_path()

Thank you. It works after removing the append in the meta-fsl-ppc* Best, —Dinh From: "Burton, Ross" mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com>> Date: Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 1:18 PM To: dinhn mailto:di...@cisco.com>> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" mailto:yocto@yoctoproje

Re: [yocto] 2.2 release note material

On 10/20/16 12:32 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Armin, > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:26:37 akuster808 wrote: >> Regarding the CVE list. I see some info is based on what was in the >> commit messages for package updates. I suspect the list would be bigger >> because of general package updates. Should

Re: [yocto] ppc-fixplt.patch - ERROR: Function failed patch_do_path()

On 20 October 2016 at 19:41, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: > I am trying to build the luajit_2.0.3.bb recipe on our Yocto-1.7 base. > It failed to path the ppc-fixplt.patch. Hers is my build configuration. > Looking back in history it's possible that both your BSP and meta-oe are both attempting to

Re: [yocto] 2.2 release note material

Hi Armin, On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:26:37 akuster808 wrote: > Regarding the CVE list. I see some info is based on what was in the > commit messages for package updates. I suspect the list would be bigger > because of general package updates. Should the release notes make note > of that? > Should th

Re: [yocto] Deciding between yocto kernels and soc vendor kernels

Hi Khem, That makes sense. Thank you for replying! -Davis On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Davis Roman wrote: > > Hello Yocto Community, > > As I understand it, the Yocto project team cherry-picks certain kernel > versions from kernel.org to

[yocto] ppc-fixplt.patch - ERROR: Function failed patch_do_path()

Hi Yocto Gurus, I am trying to build the luajit_2.0.3.bb recipe on our Yocto-1.7 base. It failed to path the ppc-fixplt.patch. Hers is my build configuration. Please give me any idea why I got HUNT # failed that ending up causing ppc-fixplt.patch error? Build Configuration: BB_VERSION=

Re: [yocto] [meta-mingw][PATCH 1/1] binutils-cross-canadian: Fix LTO failure

> On Oct 20, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Juro Bystricky wrote: > > GCC was failing with a message similar to: > > e:/windri~1/lx8.sdk/qemux8~1.800/sysroots/i686-w~1/usr/bin/i586-w~3/../../libexec/i586-wrs-linux/gcc/i586-wrs-linux/5.2.0/real-ld.exe: > unrecognized option '-plugin' > > The issue was tha

Re: [yocto] Deciding between yocto kernels and soc vendor kernels

> On Oct 20, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Davis Roman wrote: > > Hello Yocto Community, > > As I understand it, the Yocto project team cherry-picks certain kernel > versions from kernel.org to be dedicated as Yocto > Project Linux Kernels that have support for the officially suppor

Re: [yocto] ODROID-C2 and meta-odroid

On 10/20/2016 09:25 AM, Yile Ku wrote: I am having some issues getting the odroid c2 board to boot with images built with meta-odroid and yocto 2.2. The C2 integration to support 2.2 is not complete. Krogoth branch should work as it uses the hardkernels u-boot and 3.18 kernel. Neither will

[yocto] [meta-mingw][PATCH 1/1] binutils-cross-canadian: Fix LTO failure

GCC was failing with a message similar to: e:/windri~1/lx8.sdk/qemux8~1.800/sysroots/i686-w~1/usr/bin/i586-w~3/../../libexec/i586-wrs-linux/gcc/i586-wrs-linux/5.2.0/real-ld.exe: unrecognized option '-plugin' The issue was that by default plugin support was disabled in binutils. By enabling the

[yocto] [meta-mingw][krogoth][PATCH 0/1] binutils: enable plugins

This meta-mingw patch for jethro by Mark Hatle is also needed for krogoth and morty/master as well, otherwise the linker will fail, not being able to load lto plugins. Original patch: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-mingw-contrib/commit/?h=mgh/jetho/meta-mingw Juro Bystricky (1)

[yocto] Deciding between yocto kernels and soc vendor kernels

Hello Yocto Community, As I understand it, the Yocto project team cherry-picks certain kernel versions from kernel.org to be dedicated as Yocto Project Linux Kernels that have support for the officially supported arm target boards. However, if I'm using a silicon vendor, such as nxp, for a custom

[yocto] ODROID-C2 and meta-odroid

I am having some issues getting the odroid c2 board to boot with images built with meta-odroid and yocto 2.2. Is there someone I can correspond with regarding these issues? Thanks, Yile -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoc

Re: [yocto] 2.2 release note material

Paul On 10/19/2016 07:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi all, I've been gathering material for the 2.2 release notes, here is what I have at the moment. Things missing: Thanks for putting this together. * Any new features/enhancements for the kernel tools - Bruce, is there anything worth noti

Re: [yocto] libtomcrypt libtomfastmath recipe

Hi Vivek, Il 20 ott 2016 1:42 PM, "Vivek Per" ha scritto: > > Hi All, > > Thank you very much this recipe worked for me. If it worked, as already suggested by Ross, please consider posting it to the mailing list for further review and hopefully for merging into meta-oe or where it belongs best.

Re: [yocto] confusion about DEPENDS vs RDEPENDS vs PROVIDES

On 20 October 2016 at 13:06, 윤영석 wrote: > Is there anyone who explain to me..? > > The documentation covers these: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-PROVIDES http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-DEPENDS http://www.yoctoprojec

Re: [yocto] Recipe for Turbo.lua ?

> I checked at layers.openembedded.org and it seems there is no recipe for this. Thanks much Khem, I googled too, but unable to find any. Best, —Dinh On 10/19/16, 7:53 PM, "Khem Raj" wrote: >On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: >> >> Hi Yocto Gurus, >> >> I am try

[yocto] confusion about DEPENDS vs RDEPENDS vs PROVIDES

Hi, Is there anyone who explain to me..? thanks -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] libtomcrypt libtomfastmath recipe

HI, Thank you very much. regards, vivek On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Markus Volk wrote: > tomcrypt builds like this for me: > > > DESCRIPTION = "tomcrypt" > HOMEPAGE = " http://www.libtom.net"; > LICENSE = "DWTFYW" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${S}/LICENSE;md5=71b

Re: [yocto] libtomcrypt libtomfastmath recipe

Hi All, Thank you very much this recipe worked for me. Thanks and Regards, On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Please considering posting these recipe into meta-oe or similar, tomcrypt > etc comes up every few months. And posting a recipe to the list implies > you want rev

[yocto] meta-odroid status for XU4

Hi, I am interested in the current status of meta-odroid. I am targeting the XU4 platform and I am interested whether it is supposed to work out of the box with the jethro branch. I noticed that there are incompatibilities of meta-odroid/master (from https://github.com/akuster/meta-odroid) with

Re: [yocto] Install mozroot-certdata package on a read only root file system

On 20 October 2016 at 07:59, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > You'll have to extend the recipe to run mono inside a qemu, there are >> plenty of other recipes that demonstrate how to do this (fontcache and >> gio-module-cache classes come to mind, although they also use intercept >> scripts to avoid runni

[yocto] Manuals for ROOT LABELS INITRD and INITRD_IMAGE

Hi Scott, The LIVE (such as iso) and VM images (such as vmdk) can't use the same settings for ROOT LABELS INITRD and INITRD_IMAGE, either of them may fail to boot, so when the user uses one of them, they will get warnings like: WARNING: core-image-minimal-1.0-r0 do_bootimg: Found potential confl

Re: [yocto] Install mozroot-certdata package on a read only root file system

On 19 October 2016 at 21:55, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 18 October 2016 at 23:26, Nick Wareing > wrote: > >> However I'm running into an issue with a recipe in the meta-mono layer: >> mozroot-certdata. I see the culprit is the pkg_postint script ( >> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/met