Re: [yocto] is there a list somewhere of OE/YP-supported system perf/monitoring tools?

2017-02-07 Thread Maciej Borzęcki
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > colleague asked me for a list of OE/YP recipes for monitoring system > performance/resource utilization/profiling, i'm unaware of any single > list that tracks that sort of thing so i'll just ask what people are > aware of. just off the

Re: [yocto] Removing/Disabling /etc/version

2017-02-07 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Marc, On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 2:20:09 PM NZDT Marc Ferland wrote: > I would like to disable the /etc/version file from being installed to > the rootfs. How do I proceed? It looks hard-coded at first glance...? It is hardcoded, however it would be trivial to delete it in a shell function a

[yocto] [patchwork][PATCH v2 0/2] Series-view: Enable status/bundle edition

2017-02-07 Thread Jose Lamego
These changes enable patch status updating, adding a patch to an existing bundle and creating a new bundle from the series view. [YOCTO #10973] Changes in v2: Fixed javascript formatting and pep8 compliance. Jose Lamego (2): series.js: Get patch id and pass it to POST request series.py: Add

[yocto] [patchwork][PATCH v2 2/2] series.py: Add POST call

2017-02-07 Thread Jose Lamego
Current series view is missing a POST call, avoiding users to update or edit patch status or bundles. This change adds POST call to series view, including the target patch id, which is taken from request context. [YOCTO #10973] Signed-off-by: Jose Lamego --- patchwork/views/series.py | 83

[yocto] [patchwork][PATCH v2 1/2] series.js: Get patch id and pass it to POST request

2017-02-07 Thread Jose Lamego
Patch forms in series view do not pass selected patch id as request element during a POST call, so no status/bundle updates can be performed from such view. This change includes the selected patch id as a request element and pass it to POST call through a hidden input field. [YOCTO #10973] Signe

Re: [yocto] Installing iperf3 causes strange image corruption

2017-02-07 Thread Wilde, DonaldX
As it happens, I learned to generate a statically linked binary that I could load into NVRAM on our board so I could move forward and accomplish my work, but I will take your advice and I believe you’ve told me enough that I can learn to do what you say to do for the future work that I do. Once

Re: [yocto] Installing iperf3 causes strange image corruption

2017-02-07 Thread Wilde, DonaldX
My bad, Ross. I meant IMAGE_INSTALL. Must have been lexdysic the other day. ☺ From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:34 AM To: Wilde, DonaldX Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] Installing iperf3 causes strange image corruption On 1 Febr

[yocto] Removing/Disabling /etc/version

2017-02-07 Thread Marc Ferland
Hi, Easy question! I would like to disable the /etc/version file from being installed to the rootfs. How do I proceed? It looks hard-coded at first glance...? Regards, Marc -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.o

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, Feb 7, 2017 8:00 AM US Pacific Time

2017-02-07 Thread Sona Sarmadi
Hi Jolley, Cve-check tool fails on master and latest morty, I have created following bug (Jussi is working on this): Bug 11026 - cve-check: Error in executing cve-check-update Some background info about this tool: = cve-check tool has been supported since the Morty r

Re: [yocto] Installing iperf3 causes strange image corruption

2017-02-07 Thread Burton, Ross
On 7 February 2017 at 17:42, Wilde, DonaldX wrote: > My bad, Ross. I meant IMAGE_INSTALL. Must have been lexdysic the other > day. J > > In that case my guess was right: don't += it from your local.conf as you'll wipe the default value away. Use _append (and remember the leading whitespace as ap

Re: [yocto] Installing iperf3 causes strange image corruption

2017-02-07 Thread Burton, Ross
On 1 February 2017 at 20:28, Wilde, DonaldX wrote: > Unfortunately, what happens is that somewhere along the line after the > initial patch and compilation, something in our image gets radically > corrupted. With IMAGE_INCLUDE += “iperf3” set, the image is corrupted. > Horrible results occur incl

[yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, Feb 7, 2017 8:00 AM US Pacific Time

2017-02-07 Thread Jolley, Stephen K
Attendees: Stephen, Armin, Stephano Sona, Ross, Joshua, Jussi, Saul, Sveinse, Richard, Agenda: * Opens collection - 5 min (Stephen) * Yocto Project status - 5 min (Stephen/team) YP 2.3 M2 rc3 is in QA. YP 2.3 M3 target cut off is Feb. 27th. YP 2.2.1 should go into QA after YP 2.3 M2 is o

[yocto] [patchwork][PATCH] git-pw: include bundle sub-command

2017-02-07 Thread leonardo . sandoval . gonzalez
From: Leonardo Sandoval This new command allows to fetch bundles (set of selected patches by the user) and print them into the stdout. For the moment, bundles must be public (otherwise these wont be found) Command line example: openembedded-core$ git pw bundle newbundle --username lsandov1 Si

[yocto] [PATCH] git-pw: include bundle sub-command

2017-02-07 Thread leonardo . sandoval . gonzalez
From: Leonardo Sandoval This new command allows to fetch bundles (set of selected patches by the user) and print them into the stdout. For the moment, bundles must be public (otherwise these wont be found) Command line example: openembedded-core$ git pw bundle newbundle --username lsandov1 Si

[yocto] is there a list somewhere of OE/YP-supported system perf/monitoring tools?

2017-02-07 Thread Robert P. J. Day
colleague asked me for a list of OE/YP recipes for monitoring system performance/resource utilization/profiling, i'm unaware of any single list that tracks that sort of thing so i'll just ask what people are aware of. just off the top of my head: * sysstat * atop * collectd * netdata * rrd

Re: [yocto] [yocto-kernel-tools][PATCH 0/1] Rework merge of feature branches

2017-02-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2017-02-07 06:21 AM, David Vincent wrote: On vendredi 3 février 2017 13:51:34 CET Bruce Ashfield wrote: I was able to merge branches with this patch applied to Morty. Cheers, Bruce I've just successfully tested it on Morty myself. Works for me too, branches are merged just like they were

Re: [yocto] [dora] Compiling Qt 5.7 without meta-qt5

2017-02-07 Thread Karim ATIKI
Hi Burt, I tried. But many errors raise that impact the "meta-hachiko" layer which is not compatible at all with versions > Dora. De : Burton, Ross Envoyé : mardi 7 février 2017 12:44 À : Karim ATIKI Cc : yocto Objet : Re: [yocto] [dora] Compiling Qt 5.7 wi

Re: [yocto] [dora] Compiling Qt 5.7 without meta-qt5

2017-02-07 Thread Burton, Ross
On 7 February 2017 at 11:05, Karim ATIKI wrote: > Using meta-qt5 is excluded. > > But why not port meta-qt5 to dora? Ross -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [yocto-kernel-tools][PATCH 0/1] Rework merge of feature branches

2017-02-07 Thread David Vincent
On vendredi 3 février 2017 13:51:34 CET Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > I was able to merge branches with this patch applied to Morty. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > I've just successfully tested it on Morty myself. Works for me too, branches are merged just like they were before ! Thank you David -- _

[yocto] [dora] Compiling Qt 5.7 without meta-qt5

2017-02-07 Thread Karim ATIKI
I'm trying to create/integrate a recipe that builds Qt5.7 on a Architech Hachiko (ARM) board. This board is uniquely compatible with Poky DORA (for technical reasons, I don't have the choice). Using meta-qt5 is excluded. Actually? I succeeded to build qt5.7 with the Poky SDK and I would li