Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][morty][PATHV2 0/6] add main line kernel support

Hi Trevor 2017-02-17 11:33 GMT+08:00 Trevor Woerner : > Hi Eddie (and the rest of the Rockchip team), > > First let me reiterate how happy I am to see that Rockchip is interested in > supporting Yocto/OE builds, this is great! I hope this trend continues. > > Second, thank you so much for your pat

[yocto] Autotools package configure error

Hi, I'm trying to include a third party package in my custom layer. Unfortunately there is no new release of this third party package. During the 'configure' stage I get this error: configure.ac:15: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL I tried changing AM_PROG_LIBTOOL to AC_PROG_LIB

Re: [yocto] Changing UID GID (thaks)

Le 15/02/2017 à 15:57, Patrick Ohly a écrit : > > Is that for partial updates with OSTree or something else? Yes we use OSTree in AGL but the issue is very similar to the one faced by Ostro. Thanks to Joshua and Patrick for the pointers. -- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open S

[yocto] Placing xxxx.pc in nativesdk?

Hello, Yocto. Maybe a basic question but I am being puzzled. i) Recipe A builds module, and the module expects that xkbcommon.pc is available (checked in autotool by calling pkg-config) ii) module A build fails, since it cannot find xkbcommon.pc, according to the config.log. (in TEMPDIR/wor

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][morty][PATHV2 0/6] add main line kernel support

Hi Eddie, On Fri 2017-02-17 @ 04:56:28 PM, Eddie Cai wrote: > 2017-02-17 11:33 GMT+08:00 Trevor Woerner : > > You've put "morty" in the subject lines which to me means you're hoping > > these > > patches will be applied against the morty branch of meta-rockchip. Morty was > > released in October

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW08’17

Current Dev Position: YP 2.3 M3 Next Deadline: YP 2.3 M3 by Feb. 27, 2017 *** FEATURE FREEZE for 2.3 in one week *** SWAT team rotation: Juro -> Anibal on Feb. 17, 2017. SWAT team rotation: Anibal -> Todor on Feb. 24, 2017. https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team K

[yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] firefly gpt emmc update

This set of patches adds to meta-rockchip the ability to create an update image using the latest GPT-style image for flashing to a firefly-rk3288's eMMC. Jacob Chen (2): u-boot-rockchip: add rockchip-next-img: add image for rockchip next-dev u-boot Trevor Woerner (1): remove DEFAULTTUNEs

[yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/3] remove DEFAULTTUNEs

The DEFAULTTUNE configuration should not be set at the BSP layer but in a DISTRO layer (or a user's conf/local.conf). Remove the two DEFAULTTUNEs that are currently in the layer and add a note in the README to inform users of this issue and potential settings. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner --- R

[yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/3] u-boot-rockchip: add

From: Jacob Chen Rockchip next-dev U-boot is the next generation of rockchip u-boot, will also be an upstream tracking branch At present, this branch is just a rebased upstream u-boot. Reviewed-by: Trevor Woerner Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen --- conf/machine/firefly-rk3288.conf | 1 +

[yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/3] rockchip-next-img: add image for rockchip next-dev u-boot

From: Jacob Chen Being different from the previous rk-boot which use parameter, next-dev u-boot use gpt partition, so it needs to generate a different image. Reviewed-by: Trevor Woerner Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen --- classes/rockchip-next-img.bbclass | 130 +

[yocto] [PATCH] yocto-compat-layer.py: Add script to YP Compatible Layer validation

The yocto-compat-layer script serves as a tool to validate the alignament of a layer with YP Compatible Layers Programme [1], is based on an RFC sent to the ML to enable automatic testing of layers [2] that wants to be YP Compatible. The tool takes an layer (or set of layers) via command line opti

Re: [yocto] [[RFC][PATCH]] yocto-compat-layer.py: Add script to YP Compatible Layer validation

On 02/13/2017 10:27 AM, Aníbal Limón wrote: > > > On 02/11/2017 08:04 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Aníbal Limón >> wrote: >> >>> During the development of this script based on OEQA framework i found a >>> bug causing don't display stack traces, i sent a fix

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] yocto-compat-layer.py: Add script to YP Compatible Layer validation

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Aníbal Limón wrote: > +parser.add_argument('-l', '--layer', metavar='LAYER_DIR', > +help='Layer to test compatibility with Yocto Project', > +action='store', required=True) > The behavior of this argument is quite unintuitive. First, t

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] yocto-compat-layer.py: Add script to YP Compatible Layer validation

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Aníbal Limón < > anibal.li...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> +parser.add_argument('-l', '--layer', metavar='LAYER_DIR', >> +help='Layer to test compatibility with Yocto Project', >> +

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: remove evdev configuration

On 2017-02-16 12:49, Andreas Müller wrote: xorg-xserver recommends xf86-input-libinput since oe-core's commit | commit 2d005faff6341a81a2afae28860101ba9db51ae8 | Author: Jussi Kukkonen | Date: Wed Oct 26 11:37:38 2016 +0300 | |conf: Use xf86-input-libinput by default | ... As nice side e

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] WiFi on rpi3?

On 2017-02-17 03:09, Khem Raj wrote: On 1/20/17 3:52 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2017-01-20 12:30, Gary Thomas wrote: Can someone give me pointers to get the onboard WiFi on the RaspberryPi3 going? What kernel settings/hoops I need to do, what packages I might need, etc? Thanks Actually, I