Hi,
I tried to install mplayer and I got this message :
Loading cache: 100%
|#|
Time: 0:00:01
Loaded 2794 entries from dependency cache.
Parsing recipes: 100%
and this one ?
http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/mplayer
is it gui or text based ?
On 23/06/17 21:42, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Riko Ho wrote:
Hello everyone,
What do you suggest me using for internet radio / playing multi
This one ?
http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-multimedia/
On 23/06/17 21:42, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Riko Ho wrote:
Hello everyone,
What do you suggest me using for internet radio / playing multimedia on GUI
? Which recipe is suitable
it can be compiled and image can be written to the board but chromium
got error :
/usr/bin/chromium/chrome: error while loading shared libraries:
libaccessibility.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
What do I miss here on compiling ? could it be a not complete libra
Hello Everyone,
I tried to connect rev B
But I got this message below repeating,
usb 1-1.1: This Realtek USB WiFi dongle (0x0bda:0x818b) is untested!
usb 1-1.1: Please report results to jes.soren...@gmail.com
usb 1-1.1: Vendor: Realtek
usb 1-1.1: Product: 802.11n NIC
usb 1-1.1: Serial: ���
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Fri 2017-06-23 @ 03:57:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>> > Adding that line, and adding meta-clang to bblayers.conf, did get the
>> > llvm/clang compiler built and installed to recipe-sys
On Fri 2017-06-23 @ 03:57:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > Adding that line, and adding meta-clang to bblayers.conf, did get the
> > llvm/clang compiler built and installed to recipe-sysroot-native. But
> > the moment it starts to build the packag
Hi guys,
I am new to OE, only been using it about two months. I undertook the
challenge of building the entire Puppy Linux and Quirky Linux distro
from source in OE.
I had to import approximately 140 packages, there are some failures.
Some of those I can probably revisit, as my ability with OE has
x86-base.inc adds "live" to IMAGE_FSTYPES. I have no need for a live
image, or an iso, so I thought adding IMAGE_FSTYPES_remove = "live iso" to
my image recipe might work, but it complained in do_bootimg that my recipe
"depends upon non-existent task do_image_ext4". On a hunch, I movved the
IMAGE_F
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> I want to have one recipe build with clang instead of gcc (gcc is
> being used for the rest of the image). I thought this was as simple as
> adding the following line to the recipe:
>
> TOOLCHAIN = "clang"
yes thats what should do it.
I want to have one recipe build with clang instead of gcc (gcc is
being used for the rest of the image). I thought this was as simple as
adding the following line to the recipe:
TOOLCHAIN = "clang"
Adding that line, and adding meta-clang to bblayers.conf, did get the
llvm/clang compiler built
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Riko Ho wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> What do you suggest me using for internet radio / playing multimedia on GUI
> ? Which recipe is suitable for it ?
>
may be you could use mplayer or kodi
> Thanks
>
> --
>
> /***/
> Sent by Ubuntu LTS 16.04,
> 谢谢,
> Regards
* also remove correct_rpl_gettimeofday_signature.patch like in
commit e01e7c543a559c8926d72159b5cd55db0c661434
Author: Richard Purdie
Date: Thu Jun 15 23:15:00 2017 +0100
meta: Remove further uclibc remnants (inc. patches and site files)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
---
recipes-support
ERROR: gnutls-3.3.27-r0 do_fetch: Fetcher failure for URL:
'file://correct_rpl_gettimeofday_signature.patch'. Unable to fetch URL
from any source.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Martin Jansa
wrote:
> Probably yes as it got broken again yesterday:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Burton
Probably yes as it got broken again yesterday:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 12 June 2017 at 20:04, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>
>> Would it be better to just make the meta-gplv2 gnutls recipe self
>> contained and stop trying to share a .inc file and patches with
>> oe
Hello everyone,
What do you suggest me using for internet radio / playing multimedia on
GUI ? Which recipe is suitable for it ?
Thanks
--
*
/***/
Sent by Ubuntu LTS 16.04,
谢谢,
Regards,
Riko Ho
/***/
*
--
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yocto
The branch is not needed any more when it has been removed from the repo, so we
also need remove its layerbranch, otherwise it still can be got from the web,
which causes confusions.
Note, we have to move the location of tinfiol's code to avoid creating tinfoil
when not needed, otherewise, if tinf
Fixed:
- set LAYERDEPENDS_openembedded-layer = "core"
- $ "update.py -l meta-oe -b master"
Check from web, its dependency is "openembedded-core"
- Change LAYERDEPENDS_openembedded-layer = "foo"
- Run "update.py -l meta-oe -b master"
Check from web, its dependency is "openembedded-co
-p, --prune
Before fetching, remove any remote-tracking references that no longer exist
on the remote.
Fixed:
$ git push origin :test_branch
$ ./update.py
The test_branch was still in fetched local repo which was incorrect, it should
be gone since it has been removed by upstream.
Signed-off
It doesn't need to be so ahead since we only need it when writing database, and
a following patch will remove layerbranch from database when the branch had
been removed from the repo, it's not easy to do the work in
transaction.atomic() block.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang
---
layerindex/update_lay
It never works since it is in the middle of transaction.atomic() block, and
update.py doesn't need it any more, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang
---
layerindex/update_layer.py | 27 ---
1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/layerindex/update_layer.py b/lay
* Problems
The update.py couldn't handle new (not only new branch, in fact, but also
existing branches, see below for more info) branch well, for example, there are
3 layers: layer_A, layer_B and layer_C, and create new branch "branch_1" for
them, and they have depends:
layer_A -> layer_B -> layer
Othewise it may cause troubles to the function who calls it.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang
---
layerindex/recipeparse.py | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/layerindex/recipeparse.py b/layerindex/recipeparse.py
index dd85bc3..f2a5235 100644
--- a/layerindex/recipeparse.py
+++ b/l
The layerbranch is not used in parse_layer(), so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang
---
layerindex/layerconfparse.py | 2 +-
layerindex/tools/import_layer.py | 2 +-
layerindex/update_layer.py | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/layerindex/layerc
Add an option "-a" to update actual branch for layer and bitbake, it is
useful when there are many layers and need update actual branches
frequently. We only can update them via website without this patch,
which is not fun and easy to make mistakes.
* It works with "-l", and "-l bitbake" means upd
The _add_dependency() uses:
if layerbranch.collection:
var_name = layerbranch.collection
The layerbranch.collection is none if it is newly created, thus it can't get
LAYERDEPENDS, because what defined in layer.conf is LAYERDEPENDS_,
but what it would get is LAYERDEPENDS_, this patch can fix th
* V5
- Fix Paul's comments
- Add REMOVE_LAYER_DEPENDENCIES = False to settings, the
_add_dependency() will check and remove dependencies which is not in
conf/layer.conf when True (WARN when False)..
* V4
- Add an option -i to update_layer.py to get initial layer value
(dependencies,
On Friday, 23 June 2017 5:22:35 AM CEST Robert Yang wrote:
> On 06/23/2017 11:03 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
> > On 06/22/2017 07:54 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> How about this - could we start with a setting in the configuration that
> >> specifies that dependencies should be updated automatically, an
28 matches
Mail list logo
