Re: [yocto] [meta-security][rocko][PATCH] clamav: Add missing clamav.service file to SRC_URI

Please ignore this patch, it gives an error as it is unable to inherit multilib-alternatives.This class is part of our internal layer. Regards, Jagadeesh On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa < jkrishnanjana...@mvista.com> wrote: > This solves the below error when systemd

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW12’18

> On Mar 20, 2018, at 11:00 AM, Alexander Kanavin > wrote: > > On 03/20/2018 05:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: How long does a single run take, and why not run it every month? >>> Just a bit longer than a day, maybe 30 hours, if it needs to update >>> the

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW12’18

On 03/20/2018 05:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: How long does a single run take, and why not run it every month? Just a bit longer than a day, maybe 30 hours, if it needs to update the typical amount of 100-150 packages. I'll shift it to monthly then. Personally I'm leaning to every couple of

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW12’18

On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 13:26 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 03/20/2018 12:52 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > Which brings me to a question: what is a good schedule and > > cadence > > for AUH runs? Currently it's run on the 15th of every odd- > > numbered > > month (so January,

Re: [yocto] meta-raspberrypi systemd rpi0-w bluetooth startup

FWIW: Dengke's email caused me to wonder why the RDEPENDS in bluez hadn't triggered the inclusion of udev-rules-rpi in the first place. I now suspect that when I tried to switch from 'rocko' to 'master', the steps I took to force a rebuild were insufficient, and bluez5 was not recompiled with the

Re: [yocto] meta-raspberrypi systemd rpi0-w bluetooth startup

Thanks Dengke, I thought I tried using the line "After=dev-ttyAMA0.device" and referring to /dev/ttyAMA0 in the hciattach command and the brcm43438.service was still being triggered before the /dev/ttyAMA0 device was actually available on some boots, but I may have had something else wrong at that

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] features/wifi: Add WiFi driver fragments for various vendors/interfaces

This change adds WiFi driver configuration fragments. The fragments are split into vendor and interface files to allow for easy selection of drivers for specific interface types (USB, PCI, SDIO) which is useful for BSPs with specific interfaces. The specific vendor/interface config fragments can

Re: [yocto] use of variables in wic files

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any way to reference bitbake variable within the wic file > syntax? Got to this question after a wic file of mine recently broke > due to a u-boot artifact changing its name after an upstream update of >

[yocto] use of variables in wic files

Hi, Is there any way to reference bitbake variable within the wic file syntax? Got to this question after a wic file of mine recently broke due to a u-boot artifact changing its name after an upstream update of the u-boot recipe. The wic had the artifact's name hardcoded as a parameter to the

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW12’18

On 03/20/2018 12:52 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: Which brings me to a question: what is a good schedule and cadence for AUH runs? Currently it's run on the 15th of every odd-numbered month (so January, March, and so on), but I thought of shifting it one month forward, so it doesn't

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [oe-core] system lock down in middle of build

Please remember to reply to the list, not the person to who sent the mail. On 20 March 2018 at 04:10, Rajath C S wrote: > You are right, it's not actually logging out but a fast reboot occurs. > > Thanks for the info, I'll upgrade my hardware. > This isn't an "upgrade

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW12’18

On 20 March 2018 at 10:07, Alexander Kanavin < alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 03/19/2018 10:07 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> Do we have a place identified for new changes (2.6) while 2.5 >> stabilizes. >> >> >> A formal place, no. I tend to queue stuff in a branch if

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW12’18

On 03/19/2018 10:07 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: Do we have a place identified for new changes (2.6) while 2.5 stabilizes. A formal place, no.  I tend to queue stuff in a branch if master isn't taking all of my energy, otherwise the patches will sit on the list until 2.5 releases. 

[yocto] [meta-security][rocko][PATCH] clamav: Add missing clamav.service file to SRC_URI

This solves the below error when systemd is used as init manager, -- snip -- ERROR: clamav-0.99.2-r0 do_package: SYSTEMD_SERVICE_clamav value clamav.service does not exist ERROR: clamav-0.99.2-r0 do_package: Function failed: systemd_populate_packages -- snip -- Other issues: 1. Ship