[yocto] lib32-glibc headers populated instead glibc headers in the SDK toolchain - yocto 2.2.2

2018-11-11 Thread ravi chandran
Hi all, I am working as integrator in one project where both lib32 & lib64 need to be supported. Hence, lib32-glibc & glibc both are there in yocto build. In the final toolchain, after running "bitbake -c populate-sdk", it is randomly, lib32-glibc headers are getting populated instead of glibc

[yocto] [Recipe reporting system] Upgradable recipe name list

2018-11-11 Thread recipe-report
This mail was sent out by Recipe reporting system. This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers believe some of them needn't to upgrade at this time, they can fill RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON in respective recipe file to ignore this remainder until newer upstream version

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/2] intel-x86-64: Move 'CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256' to intel-x86-64.cfg

2018-11-11 Thread Hongzhi, Song
On 11/09/2018 10:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2018-11-08 8:45 p.m., Hongzhi, Song wrote: On 11/09/2018 03:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2018-11-07 9:05 p.m., Hongzhi.Song wrote: The maximum cpus are 64 on intel-x86-32. But intel-x86-64 support ranges from 1 to 8192. So we should move

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

2018-11-11 Thread akuster808
On 11/11/18 1:24 PM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:18 -0800, akuster808 wrote: >> On 11/11/18 2:21 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >>> On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 10:02 -0800, akuster808 wrote: On 11/10/18 8:25 AM,

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

2018-11-11 Thread richard . purdie
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:18 -0800, akuster808 wrote: > On 11/11/18 2:21 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 10:02 -0800, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 11/10/18 8:25 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 09:24 +, Jain,

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

2018-11-11 Thread akuster808
On 11/11/18 2:21 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 10:02 -0800, akuster808 wrote: >> On 11/10/18 8:25 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >>> On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 09:24 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: This is the full report for 2.6 M4 RC1:

[yocto] [opkg-utils PATCH] update-alternatives: Fix link relocation support

2018-11-11 Thread Niko Mauno
Commit fcb2633921eb9bb711aa264247aebcfdd4ae which added Debian-style support for link relocation tries to relocate symbolic link on host OS, resulting in following-like error when two alternative packages have symbolic link source located in different directories (/bin/rev ->

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

2018-11-11 Thread richard . purdie
On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 10:02 -0800, akuster808 wrote: > > On 11/10/18 8:25 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 09:24 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > > This is the full report for 2.6 M4 RC1: > > >