Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PULL] refpolicy: update to 2.20190201 and git HEAD policies (2019-04-10 10:57:14 -0400)

2019-04-12 Thread Joe MacDonald
Hi Yi, [Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PULL] refpolicy: update to 2.20190201 and git HEAD policies (2019-04-10 10:57:14 -0400)] On 19.04.11 (Thu 16:19) Yi Zhao wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Thank you for working on the refpolicy upgrade. > I have a quick test with your patch. Here are the results: > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-rt][PATCH 0/2] Backport two rt patches to fix build error for powerpc

2019-04-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:23 PM Hongzhi.Song wrote: > > There are tow errors when compiling powerpc rt kernel. > 1. > Error: operand out of range (0x00208690 is not between > 0x and 0x) > 2. > error: implicit declaration of function

Re: [yocto] Dependencies on other file system types for custom file system type

2019-04-12 Thread richard . purdie
On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 20:50 +0700, Eric Grunt wrote: > > The dependency code is only triggered if the image type is in > > IMAGE_FSTYPES. Did you add it there? > > Yes, in the distro conf file. > Guess, otherwise it wouldn't be built at all (since it isn't > dependency of another fs) Notice how

Re: [yocto] Dependencies on other file system types for custom file system type

2019-04-12 Thread Eric Grunt
> The dependency code is only triggered if the image type is in > IMAGE_FSTYPES. Did you add it there? Yes, in the distro conf file. Guess, otherwise it wouldn't be built at all (since it isn't dependency of another fs) -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] Dependencies on other file system types for custom file system type

2019-04-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 20:19 +0700, Eric Grunt wrote: > Dependencies on other file system types for custom file system type > > I'd like to add a custom fs type - a squashfs-xz on an ubi (instead > of ubifs). > For this purpose I created a new class, inherited image_types and > added > a

Re: [yocto] Dependencies on other file system types for custom file system type

2019-04-12 Thread Eric Grunt
better formatted class file: inherit image_types IMAGE_TYPEDEP_squashfs-xz-ubi = "squashfs-xz" do_image_squashfs-xz-ubi[depends] += "mtd-utils-native:do_populate_sysroot" do_image_squashfs-xz-ubi[depends] += "squashfs-tools-native:do_populate_sysroot" IMAGE_CMD_squashfs-xz-ubi () {

Re: [yocto] Dependencies on other file system types for custom file system type

2019-04-12 Thread Eric Grunt
class file: inherit image_types IMAGE_TYPEDEP_squashfs-xz-ubi = "squashfs-xz" do_image_squashfs-xz-ubi[depends] += "mtd-utils-native:do_populate_sysroot" do_image_squashfs-xz-ubi[depends] += "squashfs-tools-native:do_populate_sysroot" IMAGE_CMD_squashfs-xz-ubi () { squashfsubi_mkfs

[yocto] Dependencies on other file system types for custom file system type

2019-04-12 Thread Eric Grunt
Dependencies on other file system types for custom file system type I'd like to add a custom fs type - a squashfs-xz on an ubi (instead of ubifs). For this purpose I created a new class, inherited image_types and added a dependency on squashfs-xz and also on squashfs-tools-native and

[linux-yocto] L3 cache way-locking memory zone

2019-04-12 Thread Marek Bykowski
Hi Community, I'd like to query if you would see a benefit from adding in an extra memory zone to L3 cache lock region/s? This is useful if a platform/system features the L3 cache (LLC) that can be configured to way-locking (eg. such as it could in CCN-512). The benefits arising from it are as,

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6.2 RC3

2019-04-12 Thread richard . purdie
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 02:38 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > QA cycle report for 2.6.2 RC3: > > No high milestone defects. > Test results are available at following location: > ·For results of all automated tests, refer to results at > public AB [1]. > ·For other test results,

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6.2 RC3

2019-04-12 Thread richard . purdie
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 02:38 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > QA cycle report for 2.6.2 RC3: > > No high milestone defects. > Test results are available at following location: > ·For results of all automated tests, refer to results at > public AB [1]. > ·For other test results,

Re: [yocto] [meta-yocto-bsp][PATCH v2] beaglebone-yocto: Update u-boot config to match u-boot 19.04

2019-04-12 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
Hello to all, I will ask few questions here regarding U-Boot, since U-Boot mailing list is too frequent/clogged... Apropos (Regarding to) U-Boot 2019.04, I have some questions? May I? I know for the fact the following: Alexander Graf (till 03.2019 SUSE developer) said (September 2018. in